P vs SMCI vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Everpure, Super Micro Computer and NetApp Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
P Everpure, Inc.
$137.18 +5.5% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$42.16B
P/E
166.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
1 win
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$34.43 -16.1% 1M -34.7% 1Y
Market cap
$19.56B
P/E
8.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.06B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$218.42 +4.4% 1M +91.4% 1Y
Market cap
$38.83B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 5, Super Micro Computer 4, Everpure 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPSMCINTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $42.16B $19.56B $38.83B P
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 166.5x 8.8x 27.4x SMCI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 46.3x 7.6x 20.8x SMCI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.2% +77.8% +12.2% SMCI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.9% 5.7% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.0% 36.7% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.6% -34.7% +91.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +38.6%/yr +57.7%/yr +19.6%/yr SMCI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.0% 95.8% 44.9% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 57/100 58/100 NTAP

Percentile Scorecard

PSMCINTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPSMCINTAP
Valuation 17 #93 of 112 68 #37 of 112 41 #67 of 112
Growth 78 #25 of 108 73 #30 of 108 53 #51 of 108
Profitability 60 #42 of 104 55 #47 of 104 93 #8 of 104
Financial Health 35 #76 of 116 68 #38 of 116 29 #83 of 116
Shareholder Returns 64 #29 of 78 23 #60 of 78 73 #22 of 78
Overall 51 57 58
  • P ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SMCI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPSMCINTAPSPY
1 month +5.5%-16.1%+4.4% +0.7%
3 months +82.8%+24.2%+25.5% +3.7%
6 months +92.0%+25.7%+97.2% +7.1%
Year to date +104.7%+17.6%+104.0% +12.8%
1 year +40.6%-34.7%+91.4% +11.9%
3 years +316.1%+45.5%+206.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +60.9%+13.3%+45.4% +22.8%
5 years +410.7%+872.6%+144.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +38.6%+57.7%+19.6% +10.9%
10 years +997.4%+1,311.1%+547.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +27.1%+30.3%+20.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePSMCINTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.0%95.8%44.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 82.3%97.9%38.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.634.031.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.56-0.362.04 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.6%-84.8%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-34.7%-8.7% -1.2%
52-week high $156.95$52.69$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $56.99$20.53$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePSMCINTAP
P/E now vs peer median 180.3xmedian 32.9x 9.3xmedian 32.9x 30.2xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 2.9x 0.6xmedian 2.9x 5.8xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 116.4xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x 20.5xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 356.7xmedian 30.2x -3.2xmedian 30.2x 25.9xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 29.7xmedian 2.9x 1.6xmedian 2.9x 28.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.33median 1.08 0.23median 1.08 3.68median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPSMCINTAP
Revenue $4.26B $39.06B $7.39B
Gross profit $2.97B $4.23B $5.22B
Operating income $224.21M $2.77B $1.85B
Net income $253.29M $2.23B $1.42B
Free cash flow $128.17M -$6.97B $1.65B
R&D $1.05B $771.23M $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $0.73 $3.20 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $385.69M $7.52B $1.57B
Total debt – $2.00B $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 345.59M 697.35M 200.00M
Enterprise value $36.57B $2.46B $21.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
P/E 180.3x 9.3x 30.2x
P/FCF 356.7x -3.2x 25.9x
P/Operating cash flow 106.9x -3.3x 22.6x
P/S 10.7x 0.6x 5.8x
P/B 29.7x 1.6x 28.6x
P/Tangible book 30.1x 1.6x 29.4x
EV/EBITDA 116.4x – 20.5x
EV/EBIT 199.4x 6.2x 22.6x
EV/Revenue 10.5x 0.4x 5.6x
EV/FCF 348.8x -2.5x 25.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 104.5x -2.5x 22.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.33 0.23 3.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.2% 77.8% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 76.3% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.3% 74.0% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 48.8% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 195.6% 121.1% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 277.6% 53.8% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 82.0% 112.7% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 574.2% 51.6% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 77.8% 91.6% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 550.0% 40.9% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -46.6% -510.4% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.6% -130.6% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% -555.0% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.5% -135.9% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Gross margin 69.7% 10.8% 70.6%
EBITDA margin 9.0% – 27.5%
Operating margin 5.3% 7.1% 25.0%
Pretax margin 6.6% 7.1% 24.7%
Net margin 5.9% 5.7% 19.2%
FCF margin 3.0% -17.8% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin 10.0% -17.4% 25.7%
Return on equity 17.0% 20.2% 99.6%
Return on assets 5.1% 8.4% 13.1%
Return on invested capital – 17.0% 36.7%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 14.2% 29.4%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x -3.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 12.9% 1.1% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Debt / assets – 6.7% 22.7%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.5x
Debt / FCF – -0.3x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 70.5% 51.6% 86.4%
Equity / assets 29.5% 48.4% 13.6%
Interest coverage – 14.2x –
Current ratio 1.5x 3.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.9x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 8.38 3.58 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Dividend yield – – 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.6% -6.4% 1.7%
Shareholder yield 0.6% -6.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPSMCINTAP
Forward P/E 46.3xFY2026 7.6xFY2027 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.96FY2026 $4.52FY2027 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.7%FY2026 +24.5%FY2027 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +48.6% +21.7% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.74BFY2026 $74.04BFY2027 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.5%FY2026 +89.6%FY2027 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.5% +5.0% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPSMCINTAP
Held by institutions – 68.0% 97.4%
Institutions holding – 775 960
Change in shares held, QoQ – +32.3% -1.0%
Institutions buying – 451 502
Institutions selling – 233 336
Buyers to sellers – 1.94 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PSMCINTAP
P 1.00 0.36 0.55
SMCI 0.36 1.00 0.37
NTAP 0.55 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, P, SMCI and NTAP?

Everpure (P) is the largest by market capitalisation: Everpure (P) $42.16B, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) $19.56B, NetApp (NTAP) $38.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, P, SMCI and NTAP?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Everpure (P) 166.5x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 8.8x, NetApp (NTAP) 27.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) is cheapest (Everpure (P) 46.3x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 7.6x, NetApp (NTAP) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Everpure (P) +27.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +77.8%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Everpure (P) 5.9%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 5.7%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 17.0%, NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Everpure (P) +40.6%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) -34.7%, NetApp (NTAP) +91.4%. Over five years, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) compounded fastest (Everpure (P) +38.6%/yr, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +57.7%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +19.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Everpure (P) 73.0%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 95.8%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, P, SMCI and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.