OTIS vs OC vs KEQU Stock Comparison

Otis Worldwide, Owens Corning and Kewaunee Scientific Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JHX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corp
$79.44 +19.5% 1M -12.9% 1Y
Market cap
$30.24B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.14B
Div. yield
2.17%
Building Products Industrials
5 wins
OC Owens Corning
$124.07 +3.5% 1M +11.7% 1Y
Market cap
$9.57B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.65B
Div. yield
2.55%
Building Products Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Otis Worldwide leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Otis Worldwide 5, Kewaunee Scientific 4, Owens Corning 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOTISOCKEQULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $30.24B $9.57B $98.75M OTIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x -22.9x 11.9x KEQU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.3x 13.7x — OC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.8% -8.4% +5.3% OTIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.3% -4.4% 3.0% OTIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 62.2% 2.6% 10.2% OTIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 5.1x 1.2x KEQU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.17% 2.55% 0.00% OC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.9% +11.7% -17.4% OC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.6%/yr +5.4%/yr +21.8%/yr KEQU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.3% 42.4% 36.1% OTIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 43/100 65/100 KEQU

Percentile Scorecard

OTISOCKEQU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOTISOCKEQU
Valuation 46 #31 of 56 67 #19 of 56 100 #1 of 56
Growth 49 #28 of 54 13 #47 of 54 57 #24 of 54
Profitability 73 #15 of 53 25 #40 of 53 37 #34 of 53
Financial Health 12 #51 of 58 9 #53 of 58 65 #21 of 58
Shareholder Returns 39 #26 of 42 100 #1 of 42 66 #15 of 42
Overall 44 43 65
  • OTIS ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products
  • OC ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products
  • KEQU ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOTISOCKEQUSPY
1 month +19.5%+3.5%+1.2% -5.9%
3 months +7.6%-17.6%-10.0% -4.6%
6 months +2.5%+1.9%-6.5% +0.2%
Year to date -9.1%+10.9%-8.8% +7.5%
1 year -12.9%+11.7%-17.4% +8.2%
3 years -1.1%+2.3%+85.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year -0.4%+0.7%+23.0% +19.0%
5 years -2.8%+30.1%+168.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year -0.6%+5.4%+21.8% +9.4%
10 years —+164.9%+59.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+10.2%+4.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureOTISOCKEQUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.3%42.4%36.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.2%36.9%37.9% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.201.440.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.550.28-0.48 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.6%-53.4%-55.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.1%-21.9%-20.9% -5.9%
52-week high $93.62$158.96$43.10 $779.14
52-week low $64.07$98.28$32.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOTISOCKEQU
P/E now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 21.0x -22.9xmedian 21.0x 11.9xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.7x 1.0xmedian 1.7x 0.4xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 13.3x 15.4xmedian 13.3x 6.1xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 16.1x 12.5xmedian 16.1x 9.1xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median -5.6xmedian 2.8x 3.0xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 2.82median 0.89 0.67median 0.89 0.44median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOTISOCKEQU
Revenue $15.14B $9.65B $277.22M
Gross profit $4.53B $2.42B $79.15M
Operating income $2.32B $225.00M $15.06M
Net income $1.61B -$425.00M $9.06M
Free cash flow $1.67B $767.00M $10.88M
R&D $158.00M $146.00M –
EPS (diluted) $4.07 $-5.43 $2.82
Cash & equivalents $866.00M $179.00M $8.25M
Total debt $8.28B $4.89B $32.83M
Shares (diluted) 381.90M 78.70M 2.92M
Enterprise value $26.80B $8.54B $62.02M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOTISOCKEQU
P/E 19.5x -22.9x 11.9x
P/FCF 18.1x 12.5x 9.1x
P/Operating cash flow 16.5x 5.8x 6.7x
P/S 2.0x 1.0x 0.4x
P/B -5.6x 3.0x 1.3x
P/Tangible book -5.2x 11.1x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x 15.4x 6.1x
EV/EBIT 16.2x 63.5x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 1.5x 0.4x
EV/FCF 22.5x 18.6x 11.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.5x 8.7x 8.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.82 0.67 0.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOTISOCKEQU
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.8% -8.4% 5.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.6% 0.0% 8.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.3% -21.8% 2.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.5% -2.9% 24.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.0% -71.9% -24.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.5% -48.7% 16.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 13.2% 11.8% -27.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% -33.1% 22.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.8% 6.1% -32.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.9% -34.2% 27.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.8% -12.0% -30.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.1% -1.0% 177.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.5% -30.8% -41.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.0% -13.0% 62.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOTISOCKEQU
Gross margin 30.0% 25.0% 28.6%
EBITDA margin 16.5% 9.6% 7.4%
Operating margin 15.3% 2.3% 5.4%
Pretax margin 13.9% -0.4% 4.5%
Net margin 10.3% -4.4% 3.0%
FCF margin 11.1% 7.9% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% 17.1% 5.3%
Return on equity – -12.1% 11.9%
Return on assets 14.4% -3.5% 5.2%
Return on invested capital 62.2% 2.6% 10.2%
Return on capital employed 73.0% 2.3% 11.6%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.8x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -3.9x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.7% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOTISOCKEQU
Debt / assets 73.2% 41.3% 18.7%
Debt / equity -1.5x 1.5x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x 5.1x 1.2x
Debt / FCF 4.9x 6.4x 3.0x
Liabilities / assets 148.0% 73.0% 56.1%
Equity / assets -48.0% 27.0% 43.9%
Interest coverage – 0.9x 4.4x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.1x 2.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.5x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.00 2.07 3.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOTISOCKEQU
Dividend yield 2.2% 2.5% –
Net buyback yield 2.7% 7.7% 3.4%
Shareholder yield 4.8% 10.3% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 39.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOTISOCKEQU
Forward P/E 20.3xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.91FY2026 $9.06FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -3.5%FY2026 -24.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +22.0% +16.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.22BFY2026 $10.50BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +12.4%FY2026 +3.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -3.6% +0.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOTISOCKEQU
Held by institutions 93.1% 100.0% 41.8%
Institutions holding 1,222 689 32
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% +4.2% +1.0%
Institutions buying 561 366 11
Institutions selling 453 221 7
Buyers to sellers 1.24 1.66 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OTISOCKEQU
OTIS 1.00 0.41 0.00
OC 0.41 1.00 0.06
KEQU 0.00 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OTIS, OC and KEQU?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Otis Worldwide (OTIS) $30.24B, Owens Corning (OC) $9.57B, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) $98.75M.

Which stock is cheaper, OTIS, OC and KEQU?

Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 19.5x, Owens Corning (OC) -22.9x, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 11.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Owens Corning (OC) is cheapest (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 20.3x, Owens Corning (OC) 13.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Otis Worldwide (OTIS) +5.8%, Owens Corning (OC) -8.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) +5.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has the highest net margin (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 10.3%, Owens Corning (OC) -4.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) leads (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 62.2%, Owens Corning (OC) 2.6%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Owens Corning (OC) returned the most: Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -12.9%, Owens Corning (OC) +11.7%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) -17.4%. Over five years, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) compounded fastest (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) -0.6%/yr, Owens Corning (OC) +5.4%/yr, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) +21.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Owens Corning (OC) has the highest dividend yield: Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 2.17%, Owens Corning (OC) 2.55%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 0.00%. Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) has been the steadiest (Otis Worldwide (OTIS) 23.3%, Owens Corning (OC) 42.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 36.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OTIS, OC and KEQU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Otis Worldwide (OTIS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.