OSIS vs ESLT vs LMT Stock Comparison

Osi Systems, Elbit Systems and Lockheed Martin Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LHX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OSIS Osi Systems Inc
$200.95 +2.1% 1M -28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.23B
P/E
20.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
4 wins
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd
$756.62 +8.7% 1M +57.3% 1Y
Market cap
$32.19B
P/E
50.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.55B
Div. yield
0.00%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$639.21 +26.4% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$137.26B
P/E
21.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Osi Systems leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Osi Systems 4, Elbit Systems 4, Lockheed Martin 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOSISESLTLMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.23B $32.19B $137.26B LMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.4x 50.6x 21.1x OSIS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.3x 54.3x 21.7x OSIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +13.7% +7.9% ESLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.8% 7.4% 8.2% OSIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.8% 17.8% 26.5% LMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x -0.9x 1.3x ESLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.5% +57.3% +31.0% ESLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +37.2%/yr +13.8%/yr ESLT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.7% 45.2% 30.1% LMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 61/100 61/100 OSIS

Percentile Scorecard

OSISESLTLMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOSISESLTLMT
Valuation 85 #16 of 101 48 #53 of 101 69 #32 of 101
Growth 68 #32 of 98 87 #14 of 98 61 #39 of 98
Profitability 81 #19 of 97 73 #27 of 97 91 #10 of 97
Financial Health 43 #62 of 107 59 #45 of 107 40 #65 of 107
Shareholder Returns 98 #2 of 65 38 #41 of 65 44 #37 of 65
Overall 75 61 61
  • OSIS ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • ESLT ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • LMT ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOSISESLTLMTSPY
1 month +2.1%+8.7%+26.4% -2.0%
3 months -15.1%-10.9%+8.5% -2.2%
6 months -14.4%-11.1%+25.6% +4.2%
Year to date -21.2%+31.0%+32.2% +10.6%
1 year -28.5%+57.3%+31.0% +10.4%
3 years +85.3%+297.3%+41.0% +73.6%
3 years, per year +22.8%+58.4%+12.1% +20.2%
5 years +113.9%+385.5%+90.5% +61.6%
5 years, per year +16.4%+37.2%+13.8% +10.1%
10 years +201.3%+693.4%+167.8% +261.3%
10 years, per year +11.7%+23.0%+10.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOSISESLTLMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.7%45.2%30.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.7%40.4%26.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.160.74-0.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.681.271.03 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.9%-35.5%-33.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.1%-25.4%-5.5% -3.2%
52-week high $309.68$1,014.33$676.70 $779.14
52-week low $192.30$454.95$439.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOSISESLTLMT
P/E now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 26.8x 54.4xmedian 26.8x 22.6xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.9x 4.1xmedian 2.9x 1.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 14.7x 35.4xmedian 14.7x 14.7xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 29.2x 35.4xmedian 29.2x 17.6xmedian 29.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.6x 8.0xmedian 2.6x 14.7xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.93median 0.93 1.73median 0.93 64.89median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOSISESLTLMT
Revenue $1.80B $8.55B $79.12B
Gross profit $593.71M $2.14B $9.28B
Operating income $219.47M $787.82M $9.32B
Net income $158.73M $636.61M $6.51B
Free cash flow $245.20M $992.19M $8.38B
R&D $78.14M $582.72M –
EPS (diluted) $9.77 $13.56 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $236.30M $255.34M $5.96B
Total debt $999.57M $92.13M $20.50B
Shares (diluted) 16.25M 46.92M 231.50M
Enterprise value $1.89B $28.75B $121.49B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOSISESLTLMT
P/E 20.1x 54.4x 22.6x
P/FCF 12.9x 35.4x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow 10.7x 35.4x 14.6x
P/S 1.8x 4.1x 1.9x
P/B 4.0x 8.0x 14.7x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 8.0x 17.7x
EV/EBITDA 14.6x 35.4x 14.7x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 43.5x 17.4x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 4.0x 2.1x
EV/FCF 15.7x 34.5x 19.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.0x 34.5x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.93 1.73 64.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOSISESLTLMT
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 13.7% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 14.4% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% 18.5% 55.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 14.1% 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.4% 37.1% 52.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.3% 26.5% 3.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.2% 58.0% 55.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.3% 33.7% -2.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.1% 50.8% 55.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 31.5% 0.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 94.8% 22.1% 59.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.2% 82.7% 10.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 120.8% 105.8% 82.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.6% 175.7% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOSISESLTLMT
Gross margin 32.9% 25.0% 11.7%
EBITDA margin 14.7% 11.3% 13.9%
Operating margin 12.2% 9.2% 11.8%
Pretax margin 10.9% 8.1% 9.7%
Net margin 8.8% 7.4% 8.2%
FCF margin 13.6% 11.6% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 16.4% 11.6% 12.8%
Return on equity 19.6% 14.7% 69.2%
Return on assets 6.4% 4.7% 10.3%
Return on invested capital 9.8% 17.8% 26.5%
Return on capital employed 11.3% 11.0% 23.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.6x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 0.3% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOSISESLTLMT
Debt / assets 40.2% 0.7% 31.8%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.0x 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x -0.9x 1.3x
Debt / FCF 4.1x 0.1x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 68.6% 68.2% 84.4%
Equity / assets 31.4% 31.8% 15.6%
Interest coverage 9.9x – 8.6x
Current ratio 2.9x 1.4x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.08 – 3.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOSISESLTLMT
Dividend yield – 0.5% 2.2%
Net buyback yield 5.7% 0.0% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 5.7% 0.5% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.7% 49.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 14.5% 38.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -54.3% 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -17.4% 1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOSISESLTLMT
Forward P/E 17.3xFY2027 54.3xFY2026 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.62FY2027 $13.93FY2026 $29.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.3%FY2027 +22.3%FY2026 +37.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.2% +21.8% +7.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.85BFY2027 $8.84BFY2026 $85.91BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.5%FY2027 +11.3%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.1% +21.1% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOSISESLTLMT
Held by institutions 100.0% 19.9% 75.5%
Institutions holding 368 386 2,787
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% -7.1% +0.4%
Institutions buying 192 202 1,340
Institutions selling 134 108 1,030
Buyers to sellers 1.43 1.87 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OSISESLTLMT
OSIS 1.00 0.21 0.24
ESLT 0.21 1.00 0.38
LMT 0.24 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OSIS, ESLT and LMT?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Osi Systems (OSIS) $3.23B, Elbit Systems (ESLT) $32.19B, Lockheed Martin (LMT) $137.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, OSIS, ESLT and LMT?

Osi Systems (OSIS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Osi Systems (OSIS) 20.4x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 50.6x, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 21.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Osi Systems (OSIS) is cheapest (Osi Systems (OSIS) 17.3x, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 54.3x, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 21.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Elbit Systems (ESLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Osi Systems (OSIS) +2.9%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +13.7%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Osi Systems (OSIS) has the highest net margin (Osi Systems (OSIS) 8.8%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 7.4%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%). On return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads (Osi Systems (OSIS) 9.8%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 17.8%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Elbit Systems (ESLT) returned the most: Osi Systems (OSIS) -28.5%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +57.3%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +31.0%. Over five years, Elbit Systems (ESLT) compounded fastest (Osi Systems (OSIS) +16.4%/yr, Elbit Systems (ESLT) +37.2%/yr, Lockheed Martin (LMT) +13.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Osi Systems (OSIS) 0.00%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 0.00%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%. Osi Systems (OSIS) and Elbit Systems (ESLT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lockheed Martin (LMT) has been the steadiest (Osi Systems (OSIS) 41.7%, Elbit Systems (ESLT) 45.2%, Lockheed Martin (LMT) 30.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OSIS, ESLT and LMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Osi Systems (OSIS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.