OOMA vs RNG vs SANG Stock Comparison

Ooma, RingCentral and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (API) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OOMA Ooma Inc
$20.31 -4.5% 1M +82.0% 1Y
Market cap
$560.56M
P/E
51.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$306.59M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$83.66 +12.4% 1M +182.0% 1Y
Market cap
$7.07B
P/E
10.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
0.32%
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.71 -4.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$157.03M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

RingCentral leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (RingCentral 5, Ooma 4, Sangoma Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOOMARNGSANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $560.56M $7.07B $157.03M RNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 51.2x 10.6x -2.0x RNG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.7x 15.8x — OOMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.2% +5.5% -14.2% OOMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.6% 25.3% -39.0% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% 26.1% 54.0% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.5x 0.2x SANG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.32% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +82.0% +182.0% -7.5% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.5%/yr -19.3%/yr -26.5%/yr OOMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.4% 67.6% 51.2% OOMA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 57/100 41/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

OOMARNGSANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOOMARNGSANG
Valuation 43 #17 of 29 68 #10 of 29 93 #3 of 29
Growth 100 #1 of 27 65 #10 of 27 0 #27 of 27
Profitability 52 #13 of 26 76 #7 of 26 44 #15 of 26
Financial Health 30 #22 of 31 20 #25 of 31 47 #17 of 31
Shareholder Returns 29 #11 of 15 57 #7 of 15 21 #12 of 15
Overall 51 57 41
  • OOMA ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOOMARNGSANGSPY
1 month -4.5%+12.4%-4.5% +0.7%
3 months -5.3%+56.5%+15.7% +3.7%
6 months +24.4%+108.0%+10.3% +7.1%
Year to date +73.1%+189.7%-7.1% +12.8%
1 year +82.0%+182.0%-7.5% +11.9%
3 years +86.3%+225.3%+65.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +23.1%+48.2%+18.2% +22.8%
5 years -12.1%-65.7%-78.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -2.5%-19.3%-26.5% +10.9%
10 years +124.7%+314.2%+124.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +8.4%+15.3%+8.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOOMARNGSANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.4%67.6%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.5%55.8%42.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.691.140.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.812.69-0.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.8%-92.4%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.2%-3.1%-12.8% -1.2%
52-week high $23.39$86.35$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $10.58$24.82$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOOMARNGSANG
P/E now vs peer median 51.2xmedian 33.1x 10.6xmedian 33.1x -2.0xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.5x 2.7xmedian 2.5x 0.8xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.9xmedian 9.8x 13.7xmedian 9.8x 1.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 15.2x 10.6xmedian 15.2x 7.2xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 3.1x -570.4xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.72median 0.74 0.19median 0.74 0.05median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOOMARNGSANG
Revenue $306.59M $2.62B $203.08M
Gross profit $188.46M $1.89B $143.68M
Operating income $10.90M $196.64M $66.76M
Net income $10.93M $662.40M -$81.09M
Free cash flow $30.30M $667.24M $21.92M
R&D $55.82M $330.14M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $0.38 $7.55 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $17.53M $110.12M $10.43M
Total debt $46.45M $1.01B $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 28.88M 87.69M 33.24M
Enterprise value $484.00M $6.59B $98.53M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOOMARNGSANG
P/E 51.2x 10.6x -2.0x
P/FCF 18.5x 10.6x 7.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x 10.1x 6.6x
P/S 1.8x 2.7x 0.8x
P/B 5.7x -570.4x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 13.3x -125.3x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 22.9x 13.7x 1.7x
EV/EBIT 54.1x 40.5x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 3.0x 0.9x
EV/FCF 19.5x 11.9x 7.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.9x 11.4x 7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.72 0.19 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOOMARNGSANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.2% 5.5% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 6.7% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.1% 7.0% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 8.0% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 723.3% 109.8% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 68.2% 35.4% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 823.4% 4,905% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 74.7% 53.9% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 804.6% 5,149% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 70.9% 55.7% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 16.3% -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.7% 29.1% -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.0% 16.5% -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 86.0% 30.7% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOOMARNGSANG
Gross margin 61.5% 72.2% 70.7%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 22.2% 50.3%
Operating margin 3.6% 7.5% 32.9%
Pretax margin 2.9% 5.0% -41.7%
Net margin 3.6% 25.3% -39.0%
FCF margin 9.9% 25.5% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% 26.7% 11.7%
Return on equity 11.1% – -87.1%
Return on assets 4.8% 40.7% –
Return on invested capital 7.4% 26.1% 54.0%
Return on capital employed 7.1% 20.7% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.1x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 4.7% 9.2% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOOMARNGSANG
Debt / assets 20.5% 53.9% 11.6%
Debt / equity 0.5x -81.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.5x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 1.5x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 56.5% 100.7% 25.8%
Equity / assets 43.5% -0.7% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 3.1x 33.0x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.33 3.20 1.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOOMARNGSANG
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 1.7% 4.6% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.7% 4.9% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOOMARNGSANG
Forward P/E 15.7xFY2026 15.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.29FY2026 $5.28FY2026 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +0.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $319.05MFY2026 $2.76BFY2026 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +16.6%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +14.4% -3.9% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOOMARNGSANG
Held by institutions 71.9% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 167 379 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.9% +2.0% –
Institutions buying 102 212 –
Institutions selling 37 121 –
Buyers to sellers 2.76 1.75 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OOMARNGSANG
OOMA 1.00 0.36 0.10
RNG 0.36 1.00 0.03
SANG 0.10 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OOMA, RNG and SANG?

RingCentral (RNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ooma (OOMA) $560.56M, RingCentral (RNG) $7.07B, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $157.03M.

Which stock is cheaper, OOMA, RNG and SANG?

RingCentral (RNG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ooma (OOMA) 51.2x, RingCentral (RNG) 10.6x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -2.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ooma (OOMA) is cheapest (Ooma (OOMA) 15.7x, RingCentral (RNG) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ooma (OOMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ooma (OOMA) +17.2%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Ooma (OOMA) 3.6%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Ooma (OOMA) 7.4%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: Ooma (OOMA) +82.0%, RingCentral (RNG) +182.0%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -7.5%. Over five years, Ooma (OOMA) compounded fastest (Ooma (OOMA) -2.5%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -19.3%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: RingCentral (RNG) 0.32%. Ooma (OOMA) and Sangoma Technologies (SANG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ooma (OOMA) has been the steadiest (Ooma (OOMA) 45.4%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.6%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OOMA, RNG and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RingCentral (RNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.