OOMA vs RNG vs CCSI Stock Comparison

Ooma, RingCentral and Consensus Cloud Solutions Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (API) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OOMA Ooma Inc
$20.09 -7.8% 1M +75.0% 1Y
Market cap
$560.67M
P/E
51.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$306.59M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$85.64 +12.4% 1M +182.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.23B
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

RingCentral leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (RingCentral 4, Ooma 4, Consensus Cloud Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOOMARNGCCSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $560.67M $7.23B $672.44M RNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 51.3x 10.9x 7.1x CCSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.6x 16.2x 6.7x CCSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.2% +5.5% +1.5% OOMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.6% 25.3% 26.7% CCSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% 26.1% 19.0% RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.5x 2.7x OOMA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +75.0% +182.5% +35.3% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.9%/yr -18.9%/yr -10.4%/yr OOMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.5% 67.6% 53.4% OOMA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 58/100 56/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

OOMARNGCCSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOOMARNGCCSI
Valuation 50 #15 of 29 68 #10 of 29 79 #7 of 29
Growth 100 #1 of 27 65 #10 of 27 15 #23 of 27
Profitability 56 #12 of 26 76 #7 of 26 92 #3 of 26
Financial Health 37 #20 of 31 20 #25 of 31 27 #23 of 31
Shareholder Returns 31 #12 of 17 63 #7 of 17 69 #6 of 17
Overall 55 58 56
  • OOMA ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • CCSI ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOOMARNGCCSISPY
1 month -7.8%+12.4%+5.2% -0.2%
3 months -9.5%+50.4%-0.2% +3.9%
6 months +23.2%+116.4%+38.1% +8.2%
Year to date +71.3%+196.5%+69.8% +12.9%
1 year +75.0%+182.5%+35.3% +12.3%
3 years +87.1%+238.5%+81.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +23.2%+50.2%+22.0% +23.3%
5 years -9.1%-64.9%-42.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -1.9%-18.9%-10.4% +10.9%
10 years +127.8%+314.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.6%+15.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOOMARNGCCSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.5%67.6%53.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.8%55.7%53.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.131.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.652.700.66 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.8%-92.4%-82.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.1%-0.8%-7.1% -1.2%
52-week high $23.39$86.35$39.85 $779.14
52-week low $10.58$24.82$20.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOOMARNGCCSI
P/E now vs peer median 50.6xmedian 31.0x 10.8xmedian 31.0x 7.2xmedian 31.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.4x 2.8xmedian 2.4x 1.9xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.7xmedian 11.3x 14.0xmedian 11.3x 6.7xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 15.6x 10.8xmedian 15.6x 5.9xmedian 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 3.0x -583.9xmedian 3.0x 16.3xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.71median 0.74 0.19median 0.74 0.59median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOOMARNGCCSI
Revenue $306.59M $2.62B $354.67M
Gross profit $188.46M $1.89B $284.57M
Operating income $10.90M $196.64M $148.27M
Net income $10.93M $662.40M $94.65M
Free cash flow $30.30M $667.24M $115.67M
R&D $55.82M $330.14M $8.30M
EPS (diluted) $0.38 $7.55 $4.93
Cash & equivalents $17.53M $110.12M $98.90M
Total debt $46.45M $1.01B $555.29M
Shares (diluted) 28.88M 87.69M 19.18M
Enterprise value $484.11M $6.76B $308.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOOMARNGCCSI
P/E 50.6x 10.8x 7.2x
P/FCF 18.3x 10.8x 5.9x
P/Operating cash flow 14.9x 10.3x 4.7x
P/S 1.8x 2.8x 1.9x
P/B 5.6x -583.9x 16.3x
P/Tangible book 13.2x -128.2x 502.2x
EV/EBITDA 22.7x 14.0x 6.7x
EV/EBIT 53.5x 41.4x 7.7x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 3.1x 3.2x
EV/FCF 19.3x 12.2x 9.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.7x 11.6x 7.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.71 0.19 0.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOOMARNGCCSI
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.2% 5.5% 1.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 6.7% -1.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.1% 7.0% 2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 8.0% -1.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 723.3% 109.8% -0.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 68.2% 35.4% 0.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 823.4% 4,905% 16.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 74.7% 53.9% 11.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 804.6% 5,149% 18.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 70.9% 55.7% 12.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 16.3% 19.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.7% 29.1% 20.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.0% 16.5% 27.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 86.0% 30.7% 34.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOOMARNGCCSI
Gross margin 61.5% 72.2% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 22.2% 47.8%
Operating margin 3.6% 7.5% 41.8%
Pretax margin 2.9% 5.0% 35.3%
Net margin 3.6% 25.3% 26.7%
FCF margin 9.9% 25.5% 32.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% 26.7% 41.1%
Return on equity 11.1% – 297.8%
Return on assets 4.8% 40.7% 13.8%
Return on invested capital 7.4% 26.1% 19.0%
Return on capital employed 7.1% 20.7% 24.0%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.1x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 4.7% 9.2% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOOMARNGCCSI
Debt / assets 20.5% 53.9% 79.7%
Debt / equity 0.5x -81.6x 13.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.5x 2.7x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 1.5x 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 56.5% 100.7% 94.0%
Equity / assets 43.5% -0.7% 6.0%
Interest coverage – 3.1x 4.4x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.1x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.9x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 1.4x
Altman Z-score 3.30 3.25 2.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOOMARNGCCSI
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 1.7% 4.5% 5.2%
Shareholder yield 1.7% 4.8% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOOMARNGCCSI
Forward P/E 15.6xFY2026 16.2xFY2026 6.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.29FY2026 $5.28FY2026 $5.55FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 -1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +0.6% +17.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $319.05MFY2026 $2.76BFY2026 $383.79MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.6%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.4% -3.9% +2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOOMARNGCCSI
Held by institutions 71.9% 100.0% 98.8%
Institutions holding 167 379 166
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.9% +2.0% -3.5%
Institutions buying 102 212 67
Institutions selling 37 121 68
Buyers to sellers 2.76 1.75 0.99

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OOMARNGCCSI
OOMA 1.00 0.36 0.28
RNG 0.36 1.00 0.39
CCSI 0.28 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OOMA, RNG and CCSI?

RingCentral (RNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ooma (OOMA) $560.67M, RingCentral (RNG) $7.23B, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) $672.44M.

Which stock is cheaper, OOMA, RNG and CCSI?

Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ooma (OOMA) 51.3x, RingCentral (RNG) 10.9x, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) is cheapest (Ooma (OOMA) 15.6x, RingCentral (RNG) 16.2x, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 6.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ooma (OOMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ooma (OOMA) +17.2%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) +1.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) has the highest net margin (Ooma (OOMA) 3.6%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 26.7%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (Ooma (OOMA) 7.4%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 19.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: Ooma (OOMA) +75.0%, RingCentral (RNG) +182.5%, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) +35.3%. Over five years, Ooma (OOMA) compounded fastest (Ooma (OOMA) -1.9%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -18.9%/yr, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) -10.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ooma (OOMA) has been the steadiest (Ooma (OOMA) 45.5%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.6%, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 53.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OOMA, RNG and CCSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RingCentral (RNG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.