OMAB vs RLJ vs SHO Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, RLJ Lodging Trust and Sunstone Hotel Investors Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DAKT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RLJ RLJ Lodging Trust
$12.77 +13.8% 1M +87.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.95B
P/E
774.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.38B
Div. yield
4.70%
Hotel REITs Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 5, Sunstone Hotel Investors 5, RLJ Lodging Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABRLJSHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.06B $1.95B $2.39B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.0x 774.0x 56.5x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.9x 425.7x 49.5x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1.1% +7.3% SHO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.2% 4.2% SHO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.2x 1.9x SHO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.17% 4.70% 2.80% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.2% +87.8% +45.4% RLJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.7%/yr -4.3%/yr -0.1%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.3% 28.1% 22.8% SHO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 57/100 73/100 SHO

Percentile Scorecard

OMABRLJSHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABRLJSHO
Valuation 27 #100 of 137 92 #12 of 145 90 #15 of 145
Growth – 21 #114 of 144 61 #57 of 144
Profitability – 50 #71 of 140 60 #56 of 140
Financial Health 35 #96 of 147 40 #88 of 146 92 #13 of 146
Shareholder Returns 73 #24 of 85 81 #26 of 132 61 #52 of 132
Overall 45 57 73
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RLJ ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SHO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABRLJSHOSPY
1 month +11.2%+13.8%+12.9% -2.3%
3 months -1.9%+3.4%+9.9% -0.7%
6 months +0.8%+52.9%+32.5% +4.8%
Year to date -3.7%+71.4%+44.0% +10.3%
1 year +6.2%+87.8%+45.4% +10.3%
3 years +59.0%+23.4%+31.5% +73.0%
3 years, per year +16.7%+7.3%+9.6% +20.1%
5 years +116.6%-19.7%-0.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year +16.7%-4.3%-0.1% +10.1%
10 years +137.0%-34.1%+4.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year +9.0%-4.1%+0.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureOMABRLJSHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.3%28.1%22.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.7%27.6%23.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.050.660.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.203.122.00 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-60.1%-41.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.4%0.0%-0.6% -3.5%
52-week high $134.98$12.77$12.95 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$6.80$8.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABRLJSHO
P/E now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 16.1x 774.0xmedian 26.3x 56.5xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 4.2x 2.4xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.1x 11.0xmedian 14.4x 7.8xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 11.4x 11.2xmedian 23.9x 24.7xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 1.2x 0.9xmedian 1.3x 1.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.75 -12.26median 1.98 -3.01median 1.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABRLJSHO
Revenue – $1.38B $1.00B
Gross profit – – $608.66M
Operating income – – $262.94M
Net income – $27.66M $53.12M
Free cash flow – $173.52M $96.80M
EPS (diluted) – $0.02 $0.23
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $937.60M $203.71M
Total debt $756.57M $2.70B $968.37M
Shares (diluted) – 150.93M 185.55M
Enterprise value $4.55B -$116.83M $1.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABRLJSHO
P/E 17.0x 774.0x 56.5x
P/FCF 12.5x 11.2x 24.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.3x 12.1x
P/S 5.7x 1.4x 2.4x
P/B 8.0x 0.9x 1.3x
P/Tangible book -10.2x 0.9x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA – 11.0x 7.8x
EV/EBIT – 26.2x 12.0x
EV/Revenue – 2.7x 3.1x
EV/FCF – 21.3x 32.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.9x 15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -12.26 -3.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABRLJSHO
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1.1% 7.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% -0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 7.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 45.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – -52.4% 164.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.9% -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – -92.5% 917.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -63.1% -18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -0.7% 18.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% -4.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 41.9% 318.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 29.8% -4.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABRLJSHO
Gross margin – – 60.7%
EBITDA margin – 24.4% 40.4%
Operating margin – – 26.2%
Pretax margin – 2.1% 5.3%
Net margin – 0.2% 4.2%
FCF margin – 12.6% 9.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 19.3% 19.8%
Return on equity – 1.3% 2.8%
Return on assets – 0.6% 1.8%
Return on invested capital – 3.0% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 9.7x 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABRLJSHO
Debt / assets 44.0% 51.5% 31.9%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.2x 1.9x
Debt / FCF – 15.5x 10.0x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 58.6% 38.0%
Equity / assets 36.9% 41.4% 62.0%
Interest coverage – 1.3x 5.2x
Current ratio 1.3x – –
Quick ratio 1.2x – –
Cash ratio 0.7x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABRLJSHO
Dividend yield 5.2% 4.7% 2.8%
Net buyback yield – 1.5% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 5.2% 6.2% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 330.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 52.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 43.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABRLJSHO
Forward P/E 15.9xFY2026 425.7xFY2026 49.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $0.03FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +200.0%FY2026 +550.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% +33.3% -11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $1.32BFY2026 $966.48MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026 +0.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +15.4% -7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABRLJSHO
Held by institutions 12.3% 93.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 163 224 273
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +8.6% +2.6%
Institutions buying 77 118 136
Institutions selling 59 75 97
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.57 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABRLJSHO
OMAB 1.00 0.27 0.22
RLJ 0.27 1.00 0.74
SHO 0.22 0.74 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, RLJ and SHO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $5.06B, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) $1.95B, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) $2.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, RLJ and SHO?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 17.0x, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 774.0x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 56.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.9x, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 425.7x, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 49.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +1.1%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +7.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) has the highest net margin (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 0.2%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) +6.2%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +87.8%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) +45.4%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.7%/yr, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) -4.3%/yr, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) -0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.17%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 4.70%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 2.80%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.3%, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 28.1%, Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO) 22.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, RLJ and SHO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.