OMAB vs REXR vs GTMAY Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Rexford Industrial Realty and Grupo Tmm Sab Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GTMAY Grupo Tmm Sab
$3.28 +19.3% 1M +152.3% 1Y
Market cap
$572.53M
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Rexford Industrial Realty leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Rexford Industrial Realty 3, Grupo Tmm Sab 3, Central North Airport 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABREXRGTMAYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.73B $8.31B $572.53M REXR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x -20.7x 35.4x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.0x — 4.6x GTMAY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.5% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -40.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.4% -10.0% +152.3% GTMAY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.3%/yr -10.9%/yr +40.5%/yr GTMAY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 25.7% 922.2% REXR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 49/100 — REXR

Percentile Scorecard

OMABREXRGTMAY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABREXRGTMAY
Valuation 30 #96 of 136 29 #104 of 145 7 #127 of 136
Growth – 31 #98 of 141 –
Profitability – 15 #114 of 134 –
Financial Health 35 #94 of 143 89 #16 of 138 57 #62 of 143
Shareholder Returns 74 #22 of 82 80 #27 of 131 –
Overall 46 49 –
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • REXR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • GTMAY ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABREXRGTMAYSPY
1 month -3.9%+2.1%+19.3% -0.2%
3 months -8.5%-1.1%+19.3% +3.9%
6 months -6.4%+6.8%-4.9% +8.2%
Year to date -8.9%-1.2%+143.0% +12.9%
1 year -3.4%-10.0%+152.3% +12.3%
3 years +74.5%-8.7%+583.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.4%-3.0%+89.8% +23.3%
5 years +103.7%-43.7%+446.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.3%-10.9%+40.5% +10.9%
10 years +105.1%+81.7%+71.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.4%+6.2%+5.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureOMABREXRGTMAYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%25.7%922.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.1%23.1%2,260.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.120.462.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.11-0.390.17 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-62.4%-99.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-10.0%-6.0% -1.2%
52-week high $134.98$42.53$3.49 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$32.47$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABREXRGTMAY
P/E now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 16.3x -21.4xmedian 26.3x 35.4xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.0x 8.6xmedian 4.0x 5.8xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x —median 14.4x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.4x 37.6xmedian 23.3x -31.7xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 4.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 0.37median 1.91 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABREXRGTMAY
Revenue – $991.92M –
Net income – -$403.93M –
Free cash flow – $227.15M –
EPS (diluted) – $-1.79 –
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $32.23M $27.51M
Total debt $1.84B $3.26B $90.00M
Shares (diluted) – 223.81M –
Enterprise value $4.21B $7.81B $524.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABREXRGTMAY
P/E 16.1x -21.4x 35.4x
P/FCF 11.8x 37.6x -31.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 16.8x –
P/S 5.4x 8.6x 5.8x
P/B 7.5x 1.1x 4.3x
P/Tangible book -9.6x 1.1x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue – 11.9x –
EV/FCF – 51.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 23.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.37 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABREXRGTMAY
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 11.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – -222.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -58.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -238.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -57.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 11.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 296.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABREXRGTMAY
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – -40.4% –
FCF margin – 22.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 51.3% –
Return on equity – -4.9% –
Return on assets – -3.4% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 8.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABREXRGTMAY
Debt / assets 43.4% 28.1% 23.0%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.4x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 14.4x –
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 32.2% 47.5%
Equity / assets 36.9% 67.8% 52.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x – 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.2x – 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.7x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABREXRGTMAY
Dividend yield 5.5% 4.5% –
Net buyback yield – 6.4% –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 10.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – -99.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 176.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 17.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABREXRGTMAY
Forward P/E 15.0xFY2026 – 4.6xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $-1.33FY2026 $0.72FY2023
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 -254.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $976.30MFY2026 $97.26MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 -0.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% -12.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABREXRGTMAY
Held by institutions 12.3% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 163 420 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +1.3% –
Institutions buying 77 193 –
Institutions selling 59 168 –
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.15 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABREXRGTMAY
OMAB 1.00 0.06 0.04
REXR 0.06 1.00 0.04
GTMAY 0.04 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, REXR and GTMAY?

Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.73B, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) $8.31B, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) $572.53M.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, REXR and GTMAY?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.1x, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -20.7x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 35.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.0x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 4.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.4%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -10.0%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +152.3%. Over five years, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.3%/yr, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -10.9%/yr, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +40.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 0.05%. Central North Airport (OMAB) and Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 25.7%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 922.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, REXR and GTMAY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.