OMAB vs PK vs FER Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Park Hotels & Resorts and Ferrovial Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BIPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$54.53 -2.2% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$39.30B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.36%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Ferrovial leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Ferrovial 3, Central North Airport 3, Park Hotels & Resorts 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABPKFERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.74B $3.35B $39.30B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.0x -20.4x 39.1x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x 33.9x 51.0x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -1.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -6.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.51% 6.01% 1.36% PK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.2% +50.4% -14.6% PK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.2%/yr -2.1%/yr +11.8%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 30.6% 26.3% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 41/100 47/100 FER

Percentile Scorecard

OMABPKFER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABPKFER
Valuation 30 #96 of 136 68 #47 of 145 35 #34 of 52
Growth – 3 #138 of 142 –
Profitability – 24 #103 of 135 –
Financial Health 35 #94 of 143 27 #99 of 136 34 #38 of 57
Shareholder Returns 75 #21 of 81 82 #24 of 131 72 #8 of 26
Overall 46 41 47
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABPKFERSPY
1 month -3.6%+5.8%-2.2% +0.9%
3 months -7.6%+8.6%-12.8% +5.9%
6 months -7.4%+46.6%-19.3% +8.5%
Year to date -9.7%+59.0%-15.6% +13.3%
1 year -4.2%+50.4%-14.6% +12.4%
3 years +73.1%+49.6%+67.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +20.1%+14.4%+18.8% +23.5%
5 years +103.0%-10.3%+74.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +15.2%-2.1%+11.8% +11.0%
10 years +108.9%—+157.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +7.6%—+9.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureOMABPKFERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%30.6%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.0%27.6%24.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.120.771.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.141.65-0.56 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-58.1%-34.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.2%-2.1%-26.7% -0.9%
52-week high $134.98$16.99$74.38 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$9.84$48.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABPKFER
P/E now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 16.1x -20.4xmedian 25.8x 39.1xmedian 27.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 4.0x 3.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.6x 20.8xmedian 14.2x —median 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.6x 41.3xmedian 23.0x 20.0xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 5.7xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 0.38median 1.91 —median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABPKFER
Revenue – $2.54B –
Gross profit – $756.00M –
Operating income – $52.00M –
Net income – -$159.00M –
Free cash flow – $81.00M –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.82 –
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $264.00M $5.02B
Total debt $746.90M $3.92B $12.25B
Shares (diluted) – 200.00M 718.72M
Enterprise value $4.23B $2.36B $19.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABPKFER
P/E 16.0x -20.4x 39.1x
P/FCF 11.7x 41.3x 20.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.3x –
P/S 5.3x 1.3x 3.6x
P/B 7.5x 1.1x 5.7x
P/Tangible book -9.6x 1.1x 5.8x
EV/EBITDA – 20.8x –
EV/EBIT – 134.6x –
EV/Revenue – 2.8x –
EV/FCF – 86.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 17.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.38 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABPKFER
Revenue growth (1Y) – -1.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -79.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -31.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -333.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -61.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -379.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -54.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -56.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -29.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABPKFER
Gross margin – 29.8% –
EBITDA margin – 13.2% –
Operating margin – 2.0% –
Pretax margin – -5.7% –
Net margin – -6.4% –
FCF margin – 3.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 15.9% –
Return on equity – -5.1% –
Return on assets – -2.0% –
Return on invested capital – 0.7% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -2.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABPKFER
Debt / assets 43.4% 50.8% 38.0%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.3x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.9x –
Debt / FCF – 48.3x –
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 59.9% 78.5%
Equity / assets 36.9% 40.1% 21.5%
Interest coverage – 0.3x –
Current ratio 1.3x – 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x – 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABPKFER
Dividend yield 5.5% 6.0% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 6.0% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABPKFER
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 33.9xFY2026 51.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.60FY2026 $0.49FY2026 $1.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 – -20.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +28.5% +12.2% +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $933.64MFY2026 $2.42BFY2026 $11.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.6% +2.6% -5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABPKFER
Held by institutions 12.3% 100.0% 33.2%
Institutions holding 163 397 337
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +9.7% +17.5%
Institutions buying 77 218 208
Institutions selling 59 114 103
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.91 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABPKFER
OMAB 1.00 0.27 0.41
PK 0.27 1.00 0.28
FER 0.41 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, PK and FER?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.74B, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.35B, Ferrovial (FER) $39.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, PK and FER?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -20.4x, Ferrovial (FER) 39.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.9x, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 33.9x, Ferrovial (FER) 51.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +50.4%, Ferrovial (FER) -14.6%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -2.1%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +11.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has the highest dividend yield: Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.51%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 6.01%, Ferrovial (FER) 1.36%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.6%, Ferrovial (FER) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, PK and FER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferrovial (FER) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.