OMAB vs FER vs CAAP Stock Comparison

Central North Airport, Ferrovial and Corporacion America Airports Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ASR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$49.65 -10.2% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$36.19B
P/E
35.6x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Corporacion America Airports leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Corporacion America Airports 4, Ferrovial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOMABFERCAAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.78B $36.19B $3.92B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.0x 35.6x 13.4x CAAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.6x 45.6x 12.5x CAAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +16.2% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 13.5% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.8% -21.9% +32.2% CAAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr +11.1%/yr +32.4%/yr CAAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.1% 25.3% 38.5% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 53/100 53/100 FER

Percentile Scorecard

OMABFERCAAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOMABFERCAAP
Valuation 28 #98 of 136 37 #33 of 52 37 #86 of 136
Growth – – 88 #16 of 122
Profitability – – 62 #46 of 119
Financial Health 34 #97 of 147 34 #38 of 57 23 #113 of 147
Shareholder Returns 70 #26 of 84 89 #4 of 27 54 #39 of 84
Overall 44 53 53
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • CAAP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOMABFERCAAPSPY
1 month -2.7%-10.2%+1.9% -1.0%
3 months -4.7%-21.5%-4.3% +2.9%
6 months -15.4%-28.1%-3.4% +6.4%
Year to date -9.4%-23.2%-7.1% +11.4%
1 year -3.8%-21.9%+32.2% +13.1%
3 years +53.7%+52.8%+115.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +15.4%+15.2%+29.3% +21.5%
5 years +97.2%+68.9%+306.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +14.6%+11.1%+32.4% +10.9%
10 years +101.2%+134.4%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +7.2%+8.9%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureOMABFERCAAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.1%25.3%38.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.0%24.6%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.111.011.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.12-0.860.84 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-34.3%-26.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.0%-33.2%-20.4% -2.5%
52-week high $134.98$74.38$30.35 $779.14
52-week low $88.75$48.86$18.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOMABFERCAAP
P/E now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 16.0x 35.6xmedian 25.6x 13.6xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 1.0x 3.3xmedian 0.8x 1.8xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.7x —median 12.7x 1.9xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 11.5x 18.2xmedian 22.4x 8.5xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 2.3x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 —median 0.57 0.71median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOMABFERCAAP
Revenue – – $2.16B
Gross profit – – $745.77M
Operating income – – $523.99M
Net income – – $305.55M
Free cash flow – – $467.72M
EPS (diluted) – – $1.80
Cash & equivalents $172.32M $5.02B $692.48M
Total debt $1.84B $12.25B $2.64T
Shares (diluted) – 718.72M 162.45M
Enterprise value $4.26B $14.44B $1.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOMABFERCAAP
P/E 16.0x 35.6x 13.6x
P/FCF 11.8x 18.2x 8.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – 8.4x
P/S 5.4x 3.3x 1.8x
P/B 7.5x 5.2x 2.1x
P/Tangible book -9.6x 5.3x -2.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 1.9x
EV/EBIT – – 1,169x
EV/Revenue – – 283.4x
EV/FCF – – 1,310x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 1,291x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOMABFERCAAP
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 22.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 20.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 10.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 109.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 14.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 159.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 19.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 38.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 82.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOMABFERCAAP
Gross margin – – 34.5%
EBITDA margin – – 15,011%
Operating margin – – 24.2%
Pretax margin – – 18.6%
Net margin – – 13.5%
FCF margin – – 21.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – 22.0%
Return on equity – – 16.2%
Return on assets – – 6.4%
Return on invested capital – – 0.1%
Return on capital employed – – 12.9%
Asset turnover – – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOMABFERCAAP
Debt / assets 43.4% 38.0% 12,511%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.8x 314.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.9x
Debt / FCF – – 1,303x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 78.5% 60.2%
Equity / assets 36.9% 21.5% 39.8%
Interest coverage – – 0.0x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.1x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.1x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.9x
Altman Z-score – – 2.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOMABFERCAAP
Dividend yield 5.5% 3.7% 3.8%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 3.7% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOMABFERCAAP
Forward P/E 14.6xFY2026 45.6xFY2026 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.73FY2026 $1.09FY2026 $1.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.3%FY2026 -19.3%FY2026 +26.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +29.4% +11.0% +14.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $942.26MFY2026 $11.80BFY2026 $2.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.7% -5.3% +7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOMABFERCAAP
Held by institutions 12.3% 33.2% 15.3%
Institutions holding 163 337 108
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% +17.5% +2.6%
Institutions buying 77 208 59
Institutions selling 59 103 35
Buyers to sellers 1.31 2.02 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OMABFERCAAP
OMAB 1.00 0.43 0.54
FER 0.43 1.00 0.43
CAAP 0.54 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OMAB, FER and CAAP?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Ferrovial (FER) $36.19B, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) $3.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, OMAB, FER and CAAP?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Ferrovial (FER) 35.6x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) is cheapest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.6x, Ferrovial (FER) 45.6x, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 12.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) returned the most: Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.8%, Ferrovial (FER) -21.9%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +32.2%. Over five years, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) compounded fastest (Central North Airport (OMAB) +14.6%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +11.1%/yr, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +32.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Ferrovial (FER) 25.3%, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 38.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OMAB, FER and CAAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.