OC vs KEQU vs WMS Stock Comparison

Owens Corning, Kewaunee Scientific and Advanced Drainage Systems Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ALLE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OC Owens Corning
$124.07 +3.5% 1M +11.7% 1Y
Market cap
$9.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.65B
Div. yield
–
Building Products Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kewaunee Scientific leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kewaunee Scientific 5, Owens Corning 3, Advanced Drainage Systems 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionOCKEQUWMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.66B $98.75M $9.14B OC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -22.6x 11.9x 22.5x KEQU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.7x — 19.2x OC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.4% +5.3% +9.2% WMS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% 3.0% 12.4% WMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.6% 10.2% 14.3% WMS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 1.2x 1.7x KEQU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.7% -17.4% -8.8% OC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.4%/yr +21.8%/yr -0.1%/yr KEQU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.4% 36.1% 40.3% KEQU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 65/100 61/100 KEQU

Percentile Scorecard

OCKEQUWMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisOCKEQUWMS
Valuation 67 #19 of 56 100 #1 of 56 53 #27 of 56
Growth 13 #47 of 54 57 #24 of 54 36 #35 of 54
Profitability 25 #40 of 53 37 #34 of 53 79 #12 of 53
Financial Health 9 #53 of 58 65 #21 of 58 51 #29 of 58
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 42 66 #15 of 42 88 #6 of 42
Overall 43 65 61
  • OC ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products
  • KEQU ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products
  • WMS ranked among 58 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodOCKEQUWMSSPY
1 month +3.5%+1.2%-5.5% -5.9%
3 months -17.6%-10.0%-17.4% -4.6%
6 months +1.9%-6.5%-14.7% +0.2%
Year to date +10.9%-8.8%-15.1% +7.5%
1 year +11.7%-17.4%-8.8% +8.2%
3 years +2.3%+85.9%+10.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year +0.7%+23.0%+3.2% +19.0%
5 years +30.1%+168.4%-0.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year +5.4%+21.8%-0.1% +9.4%
10 years +164.9%+59.4%+538.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year +10.2%+4.8%+20.4% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureOCKEQUWMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.4%36.1%40.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.9%37.9%39.9% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.440.581.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.28-0.48-0.22 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-55.4%-50.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.9%-20.9%-29.9% -5.9%
52-week high $158.96$43.10$175.38 $779.14
52-week low $98.28$32.19$122.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleOCKEQUWMS
P/E now vs peer median -22.9xmedian 21.0x 11.9xmedian 21.0x 22.9xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.7x 0.4xmedian 1.7x 2.7xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 13.3x 6.1xmedian 13.3x 11.5xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 16.1x 9.1xmedian 16.1x 16.3xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 2.8x 4.9xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.67median 0.89 0.44median 0.89 -5.93median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsOCKEQUWMS
Revenue $9.65B $277.22M $3.26B
Gross profit $2.42B $79.15M $1.25B
Operating income $225.00M $15.06M $639.58M
Net income -$425.00M $9.06M $409.54M
Free cash flow $767.00M $10.88M $529.95M
R&D $146.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $-5.43 $2.82 $5.35
Cash & equivalents $179.00M $8.25M $153.25M
Total debt $4.89B $32.83M $1.61B
Shares (diluted) 78.70M 2.92M 75.79M
Enterprise value $8.59B $62.02M $7.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricOCKEQUWMS
P/E -22.9x 11.9x 22.9x
P/FCF 12.5x 9.1x 16.3x
P/Operating cash flow 5.8x 6.7x 11.3x
P/S 1.0x 0.4x 2.7x
P/B 3.0x 1.3x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 11.1x 1.6x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.4x 6.1x 11.5x
EV/EBIT 63.5x 8.2x 15.8x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 0.4x 3.1x
EV/FCF 18.6x 11.3x 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.7x 8.3x 13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.67 0.44 -5.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricOCKEQUWMS
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.4% 5.3% 9.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 8.1% 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -21.8% 2.4% 9.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 24.2% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -71.9% -24.7% -4.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -48.7% 16.3% -2.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.8% -27.5% -10.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -33.1% 22.3% -5.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.1% -32.1% -8.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.2% 27.1% -3.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -12.0% -30.7% 3.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 177.0% 1.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.8% -41.8% 0.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.0% 62.7% -1.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricOCKEQUWMS
Gross margin 25.0% 28.6% 38.4%
EBITDA margin 9.6% 7.4% 27.0%
Operating margin 2.3% 5.4% 19.6%
Pretax margin -0.4% 4.5% 17.4%
Net margin -4.4% 3.0% 12.4%
FCF margin 7.9% 3.9% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 17.1% 5.3% 23.5%
Return on equity -12.1% 11.9% 22.7%
Return on assets -3.5% 5.2% 9.1%
Return on invested capital 2.6% 10.2% 14.3%
Return on capital employed 2.3% 11.6% 16.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.9x 1.6x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.3% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricOCKEQUWMS
Debt / assets 41.3% 18.7% 36.1%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.4x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.1x 1.2x 1.7x
Debt / FCF 6.4x 3.0x 3.0x
Liabilities / assets 73.0% 56.1% 60.1%
Equity / assets 27.0% 43.9% 39.9%
Interest coverage 0.9x 4.4x –
Current ratio 1.1x 2.2x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.07 3.41 3.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricOCKEQUWMS
Dividend yield 2.5% – 0.6%
Net buyback yield 7.7% 3.4% 5.3%
Shareholder yield 10.3% 3.4% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 14.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 11.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 10.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 12.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusOCKEQUWMS
Forward P/E 13.7xFY2026 – 19.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $9.06FY2026 – $6.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -24.8%FY2026 – +2.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% – +22.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.50BFY2026 – $3.62BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.9%FY2026 – +18.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.5% – +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersOCKEQUWMS
Held by institutions 100.0% 41.8% 90.9%
Institutions holding 689 32 555
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +1.0% +0.3%
Institutions buying 366 11 259
Institutions selling 221 7 210
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.57 1.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

OCKEQUWMS
OC 1.00 0.06 0.63
KEQU 0.06 1.00 0.14
WMS 0.63 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, OC, KEQU and WMS?

Owens Corning (OC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Owens Corning (OC) $9.66B, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) $98.75M, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) $9.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, OC, KEQU and WMS?

Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Owens Corning (OC) -22.6x, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 11.9x, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 22.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Owens Corning (OC) is cheapest (Owens Corning (OC) 13.7x, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 19.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Owens Corning (OC) -8.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) +5.3%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) +9.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) has the highest net margin (Owens Corning (OC) -4.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 3.0%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 12.4%). On return on invested capital, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) leads (Owens Corning (OC) 2.6%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 10.2%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 14.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Owens Corning (OC) returned the most: Owens Corning (OC) +11.7%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) -17.4%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) -8.8%. Over five years, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) compounded fastest (Owens Corning (OC) +5.4%/yr, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) +21.8%/yr, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) -0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Owens Corning (OC) 0.00%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 0.00%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 0.01%. Owens Corning (OC) and Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) has been the steadiest (Owens Corning (OC) 42.4%, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) 36.1%, Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) 40.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, OC, KEQU and WMS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.