NWPX vs CDZI vs ECL Stock Comparison

NWPX Infrastructure, Cadiz and Ecolab Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CLWT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CDZI Cadiz Inc
$4.65 +27.4% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$396.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34M
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
ECL Ecolab Inc.
$291.28 +4.1% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$82.08B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.37B
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

NWPX Infrastructure leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (NWPX Infrastructure 7, Ecolab 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNWPXCDZIECLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $959.37M $396.75M $82.08B ECL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.7x -9.7x 39.4x NWPX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.2x — 36.9x NWPX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% -4.8% +9.3% NWPX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.5% -286.1% — NWPX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +82.0% -15.0% +4.1% NWPX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +33.1%/yr -5.6%/yr +5.7%/yr NWPX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 66.8% 21.9% ECL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 82/100 25/100 55/100 NWPX

Percentile Scorecard

NWPXCDZIECL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNWPXCDZIECL
Valuation 100 #1 of 21 20 #17 of 21 35 #14 of 21
Growth 94 #2 of 19 39 #12 of 19 83 #4 of 19
Profitability 75 #5 of 17 19 #14 of 17 81 #4 of 17
Financial Health 86 #4 of 22 24 #17 of 22 19 #18 of 22
Shareholder Returns 56 #5 of 10 – –
Overall 82 25 55
  • NWPX ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • CDZI ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • ECL ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNWPXCDZIECLSPY
1 month -2.9%+27.4%+4.1% -0.2%
3 months -20.9%+51.0%+2.8% +3.9%
6 months +14.9%+5.0%+9.1% +8.2%
Year to date +59.8%-17.1%+11.0% +12.9%
1 year +82.0%-15.0%+4.1% +12.3%
3 years +264.2%+68.5%+85.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +53.9%+19.0%+22.8% +23.3%
5 years +317.7%-25.1%+31.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +33.1%-5.6%+5.7% +10.9%
10 years +654.1%-36.3%+153.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +22.4%-4.4%+9.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNWPXCDZIECLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%66.8%21.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.6%64.5%22.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.301.450.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.05-0.220.19 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.8%-75.0%-44.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.4%-32.8%-5.5% -1.2%
52-week high $149.94$6.92$308.35 $779.14
52-week low $53.85$2.98$245.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNWPXCDZIECL
P/E now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 25.6x -9.5xmedian 25.6x 39.3xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.4x 27.3xmedian 2.4x 4.7xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 16.7x —median 16.7x —median 16.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 23.6x —median 23.6x 41.5xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.0x 83.9xmedian 2.0x 7.8xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.90median 1.68 2.27median 1.68 1.98median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNWPXCDZIECL
Revenue $574.44M $14.34M $17.37B
Gross profit $119.93M $4.25M –
Operating income $65.87M -$26.90M $2.90B
Net income $48.75M -$35.98M –
Free cash flow $79.65M – –
EPS (diluted) $4.98 $-1,199.69 $7.38
Cash & equivalents $19.32M $5.32M $722.30M
Total debt $9.98M $278.50M –
Shares (diluted) 9.79M 34.19K 282.20M
Enterprise value $920.84M $365.20M $82.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNWPXCDZIECL
P/E 19.7x -9.5x 39.3x
P/FCF 12.1x – 41.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x – –
P/S 1.7x 27.3x 4.7x
P/B 2.3x 83.9x 7.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 83.9x 15.2x
EV/EBITDA 11.0x – –
EV/EBIT 14.5x -17.6x –
EV/Revenue 1.7x 33.0x 4.7x
EV/FCF 12.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.90 2.27 1.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNWPXCDZIECL
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% -4.8% 9.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 89.3% 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.3% -12.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 97.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 47.2% -8.9% 11.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.5% -12.0% 17.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 46.1% -9.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.7% -4.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 48.6% -8.4% 6.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.8% -4.2% 19.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 87.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNWPXCDZIECL
Gross margin 20.9% 29.6% –
EBITDA margin 15.0% – –
Operating margin 11.5% -187.6% –
Pretax margin 11.0% -250.5% –
Net margin 8.5% -286.1% –
FCF margin 13.9% – –
Operating cash flow margin 17.5% – –
Return on equity 11.9% -257.3% 20.4%
Return on assets 7.6% -26.1% 6.9%
Return on invested capital 12.1% – –
Return on capital employed 12.5% -21.0% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.1x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNWPXCDZIECL
Debt / assets 1.5% 64.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 18.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x – –
Debt / FCF 0.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 35.8% 96.5% 66.4%
Equity / assets 64.2% 3.5% 33.6%
Interest coverage 35.1x -2.9x –
Current ratio 2.7x 1.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.9x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score 4.72 -6.13 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNWPXCDZIECL
Dividend yield – – 1.0%
Net buyback yield 1.4% – –
Shareholder yield 1.4% – 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNWPXCDZIECL
Forward P/E 19.2xFY2026 – 36.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.19FY2026 $-0.54FY2026 $7.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +45.8%FY2026 – +4.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -7.5% – +23.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $573.90MFY2026 $8.61MFY2026 $17.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.1%FY2026 -47.2%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.8% +109.5% +5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNWPXCDZIECL
Held by institutions 89.5% 46.7% 80.0%
Institutions holding 224 117 1,710
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% +4.0% +1.4%
Institutions buying 125 54 762
Institutions selling 65 39 679
Buyers to sellers 1.92 1.38 1.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NWPXCDZIECL
NWPX 1.00 0.17 0.22
CDZI 0.17 1.00 0.11
ECL 0.22 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NWPX, CDZI and ECL?

Ecolab (ECL) is the largest by market capitalisation: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) $959.37M, Cadiz (CDZI) $396.75M, Ecolab (ECL) $82.08B.

Which stock is cheaper, NWPX, CDZI and ECL?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 19.7x, Cadiz (CDZI) -9.7x, Ecolab (ECL) 39.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) is cheapest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 19.2x, Ecolab (ECL) 36.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +15.1%, Cadiz (CDZI) -4.8%, Ecolab (ECL) +9.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) has the highest net margin (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 8.5%, Cadiz (CDZI) -286.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) returned the most: NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +82.0%, Cadiz (CDZI) -15.0%, Ecolab (ECL) +4.1%. Over five years, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) compounded fastest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +33.1%/yr, Cadiz (CDZI) -5.6%/yr, Ecolab (ECL) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ecolab (ECL) has been the steadiest (NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 39.9%, Cadiz (CDZI) 66.8%, Ecolab (ECL) 21.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NWPX, CDZI and ECL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.