NWL vs HELE vs LCUT Stock Comparison

Newell Brands, Helen Of Troy and Lifetime Brands Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NPK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.48 -1.3% 1M +70.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.30B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.31B
Div. yield
0.06%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
HELE Helen Of Troy Ltd
$37.77 +49.2% 1M +86.7% 1Y
Market cap
$872.51M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.83B
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
LCUT Lifetime Brands, Inc
$7.76 -15.3% 1M +151.9% 1Y
Market cap
$166.62M
P/E
5.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$666.83M
Div. yield
–
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lifetime Brands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lifetime Brands 8, Newell Brands 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNWLHELELCUTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.30B $872.51M $166.62M NWL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.1x -8.8x 5.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.6x 10.1x 4.0x LCUT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.8% +0.3% +1.2% LCUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% -5.4% 4.3% LCUT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.0% 1.6% 13.5% LCUT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 11.9x 8.3x 1.1x LCUT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +70.2% +86.7% +151.9% LCUT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.7%/yr -30.7%/yr -16.6%/yr LCUT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.5% 58.4% 81.7% NWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 39/100 70/100 LCUT

Percentile Scorecard

NWLHELELCUT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNWLHELELCUT
Valuation 44 #24 of 42 71 #13 of 42 100 #1 of 42
Growth 30 #29 of 41 40 #25 of 41 88 #6 of 41
Profitability 29 #28 of 39 47 #21 of 39 82 #8 of 39
Financial Health 9 #40 of 44 23 #34 of 44 51 #22 of 44
Shareholder Returns 89 #4 of 27 15 #23 of 27 31 #19 of 27
Overall 40 39 70
  • NWL ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • HELE ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • LCUT ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNWLHELELCUTSPY
1 month -1.3%+49.2%-15.3% -5.9%
3 months -9.0%+31.1%-10.8% -4.6%
6 months +23.1%+46.3%+7.9% +0.2%
Year to date +47.3%+77.7%+96.5% +7.5%
1 year +70.2%+86.7%+151.9% +8.2%
3 years -22.2%-62.6%+37.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year -8.0%-28.0%+11.2% +19.0%
5 years -77.3%-84.0%-59.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year -25.7%-30.7%-16.6% +9.4%
10 years -88.5%-52.8%-44.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year -19.4%-7.2%-5.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureNWLHELELCUTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.5%58.4%81.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.3%48.1%75.9% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.240.981.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.291.491.86 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.1%-94.5%-84.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.8%0.0%-21.6% -5.9%
52-week high $6.36$37.77$9.90 $779.14
52-week low $3.11$13.88$3.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNWLHELELCUT
P/E now vs peer median -7.2xmedian 16.0x -8.9xmedian 16.0x 6.0xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 10.7x 19.5xmedian 10.7x 3.6xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 44.0xmedian 12.4x 6.0xmedian 12.4x 3.5xmedian 12.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.42median 0.54 0.22median 0.54 0.08median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNWLHELELCUT
Revenue $7.31B $1.83B $666.83M
Gross profit $2.60B $864.98M $291.12M
Operating income $72.00M $23.94M $49.35M
Net income -$323.00M -$99.23M $28.79M
Free cash flow $53.00M $147.21M $50.73M
EPS (diluted) $-0.75 $-4.11 $1.29
Cash & equivalents $249.00M $22.58M $5.93M
Total debt $4.84B $672.62M $89.86M
Shares (diluted) 430.20M 24.15M 22.25M
Enterprise value $1.44B $782.23M $137.11M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNWLHELELCUT
P/E -7.2x -8.9x 6.0x
P/FCF 44.0x 6.0x 3.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.2x 4.9x 2.9x
P/S 0.3x 0.5x 0.3x
P/B 1.0x 1.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 1.8x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.9x 19.5x 3.6x
EV/EBIT 96.2x 63.9x 5.3x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.8x 0.4x
EV/FCF 130.7x 10.4x 5.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.3x 8.5x 4.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.42 0.22 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNWLHELELCUT
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.8% 0.3% 1.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.3% -3.1% -1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.3% 0.5% 19.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.7% -1.7% 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -77.5% 103.7% 454.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% -52.1% 19.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,246% 84.9% 179.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.3% -39.6% 78.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,225% 85.7% 177.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.4% -39.5% 76.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.4% 97.1% 150.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -36.1% -25.9% -0.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 365.0% 192.7% 149.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -57.2% -25.7% -4.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNWLHELELCUT
Gross margin 35.6% 47.4% 43.7%
EBITDA margin 5.3% 4.3% 11.0%
Operating margin 1.0% 1.3% 7.4%
Pretax margin -4.3% -1.5% 4.7%
Net margin -4.4% -5.4% 4.3%
FCF margin 0.7% 8.1% 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 9.8% 9.1%
Return on equity -13.4% -11.7% 13.4%
Return on assets -2.9% -4.8% 4.6%
Return on invested capital 1.0% 1.6% 13.5%
Return on capital employed 0.9% 1.5% 10.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.9x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.8x -1.8x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 1.0% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNWLHELELCUT
Debt / assets 44.3% 32.1% 14.3%
Debt / equity 2.0x 0.8x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 11.9x 8.3x 1.1x
Debt / FCF 91.3x 4.6x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 78.4% 59.3% 66.1%
Equity / assets 21.6% 40.7% 33.9%
Interest coverage – 0.5x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.7x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 0.52 1.83 1.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNWLHELELCUT
Dividend yield 5.1% – 2.1%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 5.1% -0.1% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) -39.3% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 239.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -20.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNWLHELELCUT
Forward P/E 7.6xFY2026 10.1xFY2026 4.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.72FY2026 $3.74FY2026 $1.96FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.3%FY2026 +5.4%FY2026 +142.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.2% +13.9% -46.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.89BFY2026 $1.76BFY2026 $703.72MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.3%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.0% -2.6% +4.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNWLHELELCUT
Held by institutions 100.0% 96.3% 43.3%
Institutions holding 421 200 88
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.2% +5.7% +9.6%
Institutions buying 234 122 65
Institutions selling 124 46 15
Buyers to sellers 1.89 2.65 4.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NWLHELELCUT
NWL 1.00 0.37 0.05
HELE 0.37 1.00 0.14
LCUT 0.05 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NWL, HELE and LCUT?

Newell Brands (NWL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Newell Brands (NWL) $2.30B, Helen Of Troy (HELE) $872.51M, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) $166.62M.

Which company is growing faster?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Newell Brands (NWL) +0.8%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) +0.3%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) +1.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) has the highest net margin (Newell Brands (NWL) -4.4%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) -5.4%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 4.3%). On return on invested capital, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads (Newell Brands (NWL) 1.0%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) 1.6%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 13.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lifetime Brands (LCUT) returned the most: Newell Brands (NWL) +70.2%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) +86.7%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) +151.9%. Over five years, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) compounded fastest (Newell Brands (NWL) -25.7%/yr, Helen Of Troy (HELE) -30.7%/yr, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) -16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Newell Brands (NWL) 0.06%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) 0.00%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 0.00%. Helen Of Troy (HELE) and Lifetime Brands (LCUT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Newell Brands (NWL) has been the steadiest (Newell Brands (NWL) 54.5%, Helen Of Troy (HELE) 58.4%, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) 81.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NWL, HELE and LCUT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lifetime Brands (LCUT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.