NUS vs ODD vs MLKMF Stock Comparison

Nu Skin Enterprises, Oddity Tech and Waldencast Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ODD Oddity Tech Ltd
$21.59 +15.8% 1M -54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.23B
P/E
94.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$679.09M
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
5 wins
MLKMF Waldencast plc
$0.88 -14.6% 1M -54.4% 1Y
Market cap
$100.38M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Oddity Tech leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Oddity Tech 5, Nu Skin Enterprises 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNUSODDMLKMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $230.73M $1.23B $100.38M ODD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x 94.5x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.1x 49.1x — NUS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -15.4% -9.7% — ODD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -15.7% 1.9% — ODD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.2% -0.5% — ODD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 50.2x — NUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.06% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -56.7% -54.1% -54.4% ODD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.8%/yr — -38.2%/yr NUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.9% 106.5% 100.5% NUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 26/100 — NUS

Percentile Scorecard

NUSODDMLKMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNUSODDMLKMF
Valuation 86 #8 of 52 28 #38 of 52 –
Growth 10 #45 of 50 14 #43 of 50 –
Profitability 43 #26 of 45 32 #31 of 45 –
Financial Health 64 #21 of 56 49 #29 of 56 67 #19 of 56
Shareholder Returns 73 #9 of 31 7 #29 of 31 –
Overall 55 26 –
  • NUS ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • ODD ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • MLKMF ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNUSODDMLKMFSPY
1 month +2.4%+15.8%-14.6% -0.2%
3 months -9.7%+27.1%-47.3% +3.9%
6 months -35.7%+40.1%+12.8% +8.2%
Year to date -50.7%-46.3%-53.2% +12.9%
1 year -56.7%-54.1%-54.4% +12.3%
3 years -74.4%-15.4%-90.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -36.5%-5.4%-53.6% +23.3%
5 years -88.2%—-90.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -34.8%—-38.2% +10.9%
10 years -92.3%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year -22.7%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNUSODDMLKMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.9%106.5%100.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.2%130.0%88.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.600.861.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.18-0.51-0.54 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -91.9%-87.3%-93.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.9%-54.1%-71.4% -1.2%
52-week high $11.54$47.05$3.08 $779.14
52-week low $4.53$9.81$0.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNUSODDMLKMF
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 18.5x 94.5xmedian 18.5x —median 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.6x 1.8xmedian 1.6x —median 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 12.9x 229.7xmedian 12.9x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 18.6x -51.0xmedian 18.6x —median 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.2x 5.1xmedian 2.2x 0.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.97 -2.42median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNUSODDMLKMF
Revenue $1.38B $679.09M –
Gross profit $951.49M $475.42M –
Operating income -$10.41M -$7.74M –
Net income -$216.39M $15.16M –
Free cash flow $10.78M -$24.08M –
EPS (diluted) $-4.45 $0.21 –
Cash & equivalents $189.64M $167.27M $7.82M
Total debt $213.66M $2.29B $631.43M
Shares (diluted) 48.60M 61.64M 114.07M
Enterprise value -$653.90M -$286.45M $38.41M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNUSODDMLKMF
P/E -1.1x 94.5x –
P/FCF 21.4x -51.0x –
P/Operating cash flow 4.5x -62.2x –
P/S 0.2x 1.8x –
P/B 0.4x 5.1x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 6.3x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 6.4x 229.7x –
EV/EBIT -24.3x -203.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.2x 2.3x –
EV/FCF 23.5x -65.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 5.0x -79.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 -2.42 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNUSODDMLKMF
Revenue growth (1Y) -15.4% -9.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.3% 14.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -13.0% -13.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -13.1% 14.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.5% -106.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.2% -28.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -314.6% -86.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -72.0% -33.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) -318.6% -88.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -73.1% -39.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -45.6% -109.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.0% -30.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -81.6% -111.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 76.1% -31.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNUSODDMLKMF
Gross margin 69.2% 70.0% –
EBITDA margin 2.9% 1.0% –
Operating margin -0.8% -1.1% –
Pretax margin -1.9% 3.8% –
Net margin -15.7% 1.9% –
FCF margin 0.8% -3.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 3.7% -2.9% –
Return on equity -32.4% 0.8% –
Return on assets -17.3% 0.2% –
Return on invested capital -1.2% -0.5% –
Return on capital employed -1.0% -0.9% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x -1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 5.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNUSODDMLKMF
Debt / assets 19.1% 57.5% 23.1%
Debt / equity 0.4x 2.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 50.2x –
Debt / FCF 19.8x -22.3x –
Liabilities / assets 51.6% 74.0% 39.5%
Equity / assets 48.4% 26.0% 60.5%
Interest coverage -0.7x – –
Current ratio 2.0x 3.5x 4.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.8x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.71 2.58 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNUSODDMLKMF
Dividend yield 5.1% – –
Net buyback yield 10.8% -6.6% –
Shareholder yield 15.9% -6.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) -5.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 108.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -2.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -46.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNUSODDMLKMF
Forward P/E 6.1xFY2026 49.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.78FY2026 $0.44FY2026 $-0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -38.6%FY2026 -80.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +43.6% +154.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.24BFY2026 $699.01MFY2026 $272.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -17.1%FY2026 -13.7%FY2026 +0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.7% +10.6% +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNUSODDMLKMF
Held by institutions 74.1% 67.0% –
Institutions holding 161 136 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.9% +3.0% –
Institutions buying 77 80 –
Institutions selling 61 35 –
Buyers to sellers 1.26 2.29 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NUSODDMLKMF
NUS 1.00 0.11 0.14
ODD 0.11 1.00 0.02
MLKMF 0.14 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NUS, ODD and MLKMF?

Oddity Tech (ODD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) $230.73M, Oddity Tech (ODD) $1.23B, Waldencast (MLKMF) $100.38M.

Which company is growing faster?

Oddity Tech (ODD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) -15.4%, Oddity Tech (ODD) -9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Oddity Tech (ODD) has the highest net margin (Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) -15.7%, Oddity Tech (ODD) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Oddity Tech (ODD) leads (Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) -1.2%, Oddity Tech (ODD) -0.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oddity Tech (ODD) returned the most: Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) -56.7%, Oddity Tech (ODD) -54.1%, Waldencast (MLKMF) -54.4%. Over five years, Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) compounded fastest (Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) -34.8%/yr, Waldencast (MLKMF) -38.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) 5.06%. Oddity Tech (ODD) and Waldencast (MLKMF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) has been the steadiest (Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) 47.9%, Oddity Tech (ODD) 106.5%, Waldencast (MLKMF) 100.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NUS, ODD and MLKMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oddity Tech (ODD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.