NU vs MS Stock Comparison

Nu Holdings and Morgan Stanley Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.
$15.15 +11.2% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$60.77B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.34B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
MS Morgan Stanley
$179.49 -9.5% 1M +12.7% 1Y
Market cap
$285.21B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.04B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Morgan Stanley leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Morgan Stanley 7, Nu Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNUMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.77B $285.21B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 14.6x MS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.8x 13.2x MS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.5% +18.0% NU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.7% 25.0% MS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.1% 12.0% NU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.0x 2.9x NU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% +12.7% MS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.0%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 28.5% MS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 39/100 MS

Percentile Scorecard

NUMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNUMS
Valuation 6 #338 of 361 7 #337 of 361
Growth 79 #73 of 344 88 #44 of 344
Profitability 30 #244 of 348 25 #263 of 348
Financial Health 71 #101 of 340 2 #332 of 340
Shareholder Returns 9 #320 of 352 75 #88 of 352
Overall 39 39
  • NU ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • MS ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNUMSSPY
1 month +11.2%-9.5% -1.0%
3 months +7.5%-16.3% +2.9%
6 months +4.4%-4.6% +6.4%
Year to date -9.5%+1.1% +11.4%
1 year -4.7%+12.7% +13.1%
3 years +87.5%+150.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +23.3%+35.9% +21.5%
5 years —+76.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+12.0% +10.9%
10 years —+436.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+18.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureNUMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%28.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.7%29.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.110.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.1%-35.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-21.5% -2.5%
52-week high $18.76$228.55 $779.14
52-week low $11.60$154.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNUMS
P/E now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 12.5x 14.3xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.5x 3.6xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 4.8x 6.3xmedian 4.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -53.7xmedian 11.4x -15.2xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.48 0.49median 1.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNUMS
Revenue $19.34B $78.04B
Gross profit $7.97B –
Operating income $4.39B –
Net income $3.61B $20.37B
Free cash flow -$1.36B -$18.58B
EPS (diluted) $0.74 $12.46
Cash & equivalents $13.55B $160.14B
Total debt $14.55B $392.56B
Shares (diluted) 4.91B 1.57B
Enterprise value $4.76B -$223.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNUMS
P/E 20.3x 14.3x
P/FCF -53.7x -15.2x
P/Operating cash flow -53.0x -18.1x
P/S 3.8x 3.6x
P/B 5.5x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x 6.3x
EV/EBIT 14.6x 6.7x
EV/Revenue 3.3x 6.6x
EV/FCF -47.1x -27.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -46.5x -33.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNUMS
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.5% 18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 45.8% 13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 38.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 132.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 56.9% 36.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 260.8% 26.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.2% 40.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 603.5% 29.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -135.1% 11.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.0% 27.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.5% 11.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.6% 25.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNUMS
Gross margin 41.2% –
EBITDA margin 23.4% 104.2%
Operating margin 22.7% –
Pretax margin 22.7% 33.5%
Net margin 18.7% 25.0%
FCF margin -7.0% -23.8%
Operating cash flow margin -7.1% -20.0%
Return on equity 24.5% 17.5%
Return on assets 4.0% 1.3%
Return on invested capital 18.1% 12.0%
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x -0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNUMS
Debt / assets 5.7% 23.4%
Debt / equity 0.4x 3.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.0x 2.9x
Debt / FCF -3.4x -21.1x
Liabilities / assets 84.0% 93.0%
Equity / assets 16.0% 7.0%
Interest coverage 1.2x 1.5x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNUMS
Dividend yield – 2.3%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 2.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNUMS
Forward P/E 16.8xFY2026 13.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $13.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +55.2%FY2026 +33.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.6% -4.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.04BFY2026 $79.95BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.4%FY2026 +13.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.8% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNUMS
Held by institutions 59.8% 85.7%
Institutions holding 854 2,740
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +1.5%
Institutions buying 442 1,466
Institutions selling 305 939
Buyers to sellers 1.45 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NUMS
NU 1.00 0.33
MS 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NU and MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nu Holdings (NU) $60.77B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $285.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, NU and MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.8x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Morgan Stanley (MS) is cheapest (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.8x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nu Holdings (NU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nu Holdings (NU) +50.5%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Morgan Stanley (MS) has the highest net margin (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.7%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 25.0%). On return on invested capital, Nu Holdings (NU) leads (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.1%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 12.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Morgan Stanley (MS) returned the most: Nu Holdings (NU) -4.7%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Morgan Stanley (MS) has been the steadiest (Nu Holdings (NU) 42.2%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do NU and MS move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.33, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, NU and MS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Morgan Stanley (MS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.