NU vs MS vs HSBC Stock Comparison

Nu Holdings, Morgan Stanley and Hsbc Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.
$12.40 -8.7% 1M -22.5% 1Y
Market cap
$58.00B
P/E
16.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.34B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
MS Morgan Stanley
$186.98 -4.7% 1M +12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$295.97B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$80.16B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
HSBC Hsbc Holdings Plc
$86.01 -14.8% 1M +28.0% 1Y
Market cap
$301.42B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.16B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
9 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Hsbc Holdings leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Hsbc Holdings 9). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNUMSHSBCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.00B $295.97B $301.42B HSBC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.1x 14.9x 11.4x HSBC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.7x 9.5x HSBC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.5% +16.2% +1,900.0% HSBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.7% — 47.9% HSBC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.5% +12.6% +28.0% HSBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.8%/yr +23.1%/yr HSBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.1% 28.4% 28.3% HSBC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 53/100 65/100 HSBC

Percentile Scorecard

NUMSHSBC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNUMSHSBC
Valuation 10 #325 of 360 31 #248 of 360 13 #313 of 360
Growth 78 #42 of 191 94 #13 of 191 70 #58 of 191
Profitability 35 #109 of 168 – 86 #25 of 168
Financial Health 73 #48 of 175 – –
Shareholder Returns 11 #304 of 341 34 #225 of 341 90 #34 of 341
Overall 41 53 65
  • NU ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • HSBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNUMSHSBCSPY
1 month -8.7%-4.7%-14.8% -0.2%
3 months -15.5%-11.6%-17.0% +3.9%
6 months -14.5%-1.8%-4.4% +8.2%
Year to date -25.9%+5.3%+9.3% +12.9%
1 year -22.5%+12.6%+28.0% +12.3%
3 years +54.8%+165.6%+134.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +15.7%+38.5%+32.8% +23.3%
5 years —+82.4%+182.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+12.8%+23.1% +10.9%
10 years —+452.9%+126.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+18.7%+8.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNUMSHSBCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.1%28.4%28.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.1%29.8%28.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.461.421.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.490.440.99 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.1%-35.3%-34.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.9%-18.2%-20.3% -1.2%
52-week high $18.76$228.55$107.85 $779.14
52-week low $11.60$154.37$67.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNUMSHSBC
P/E now vs peer median 16.6xmedian 12.1x 14.6xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.4x 3.7xmedian 3.4x 5.4xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -44.0xmedian 10.9x -16.3xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.34 0.47median 1.34 3.03median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNUMSHSBC
Revenue $19.34B $80.16B $55.16B
Gross profit $7.97B – –
Operating income $4.39B – $33.06B
Net income $3.61B – $28.08B
Free cash flow -$1.36B – –
EPS (diluted) $0.74 $12.65 $7.53
Cash & equivalents $13.55B – $222.46B
Total debt $14.55B – –
Shares (diluted) 4.91B 1.57B 3.51B
Enterprise value $1.98B $295.97B -$1.80T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNUMSHSBC
P/E 16.6x 14.6x 11.3x
P/FCF -44.0x -16.3x –
P/Operating cash flow -43.4x – –
P/S 3.1x 3.7x 5.4x
P/B 4.5x – 1.5x
P/Tangible book 4.8x – 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 11.3x – –
EV/EBIT 11.6x – -16.4x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 3.7x -9.8x
EV/FCF -37.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -36.9x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.47 3.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNUMSHSBC
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.5% 16.2% 1,900%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 45.8% 14.1% -4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 38.6% – 40.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 132.2% – 1.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 56.9% – 51.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 260.8% – -1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.2% 29.2% 68.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 603.5% 30.9% 3.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -135.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.5% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNUMSHSBC
Gross margin 41.2% – –
EBITDA margin 23.4% – –
Operating margin 22.7% – 59.9%
Pretax margin 22.7% – 65.2%
Net margin 18.7% – 47.9%
FCF margin -7.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin -7.1% – –
Return on equity 24.5% – 14.3%
Return on assets 4.0% 1.2% 0.8%
Return on invested capital 18.1% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNUMSHSBC
Debt / assets 5.7% – –
Debt / equity 0.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.0x – –
Debt / FCF -3.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 84.0% – 94.3%
Equity / assets 16.0% – 5.7%
Interest coverage 1.2x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNUMSHSBC
Dividend yield – 2.2% 4.4%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.2% 4.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNUMSHSBC
Forward P/E – 13.7xFY2026 9.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.06FY2023 $13.66FY2026 $9.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +33.8%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -4.2% +9.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $42.10BFY2029 $80.05BFY2026 $70.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3,295.3%FY2029 +13.3%FY2026 -1.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +13.3% +18.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNUMSHSBC
Held by institutions 59.8% 85.7% 2.5%
Institutions holding 854 2,742 707
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +1.5% -0.3%
Institutions buying 442 1,468 402
Institutions selling 305 939 180
Buyers to sellers 1.45 1.56 2.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NUMSHSBC
NU 1.00 0.27 0.28
MS 0.27 1.00 0.51
HSBC 0.28 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NU, MS and HSBC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nu Holdings (NU) $58.00B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $295.97B, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) $301.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, NU, MS and HSBC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.1x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.9x, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is cheapest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.7x, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nu Holdings (NU) +50.5%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +16.2%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +1,900.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has the highest net margin (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.7%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 47.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) returned the most: Nu Holdings (NU) -22.5%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.6%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +28.0%. Over five years, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) compounded fastest (Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.8%/yr, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +23.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has been the steadiest (Nu Holdings (NU) 46.1%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.4%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 28.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NU, MS and HSBC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.