NU vs HSBC vs WFC Stock Comparison

Nu Holdings, Hsbc Holdings and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.
$12.59 -7.3% 1M -20.5% 1Y
Market cap
$59.86B
P/E
16.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.34B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
HSBC Hsbc Holdings Plc
$91.17 -9.7% 1M +36.1% 1Y
Market cap
$300.13B
P/E
12.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.61B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
8 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.65 -0.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$251.74B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Hsbc Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Hsbc Holdings 8, Wells Fargo & Company 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNUHSBCWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $59.86B $300.13B $251.74B HSBC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.6x 12.1x 12.4x HSBC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.1x 10.6x HSBC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.5% +2,725.8% +5.4% HSBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.7% 44.6% — HSBC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.5% +36.1% -4.4% HSBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +24.6%/yr +10.6%/yr HSBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.2% 27.7% 25.6% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 69/100 38/100 HSBC

Percentile Scorecard

NUHSBCWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNUHSBCWFC
Valuation 10 #327 of 362 33 #242 of 362 62 #138 of 362
Growth 81 #42 of 221 73 #60 of 221 21 #174 of 221
Profitability 35 #131 of 200 81 #38 of 200 –
Financial Health 72 #57 of 203 – –
Shareholder Returns 11 #305 of 342 89 #40 of 342 32 #234 of 342
Overall 42 69 38
  • NU ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • HSBC ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNUHSBCWFCSPY
1 month -7.3%-9.7%-0.4% -0.8%
3 months -13.4%-12.3%-5.3% +3.5%
6 months -14.0%+1.3%+2.6% +7.0%
Year to date -24.8%+15.9%-11.3% +12.2%
1 year -20.5%+36.1%-4.4% +13.0%
3 years +57.2%+148.4%+113.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.3%+35.5%+28.7% +23.1%
5 years —+199.7%+65.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+24.6%+10.6% +11.0%
10 years —+139.2%+79.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.1%+6.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNUHSBCWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.2%27.7%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.3%26.8%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.471.280.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.441.30-0.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.1%-34.6%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.9%-15.5%-14.3% -1.8%
52-week high $18.76$107.85$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $11.60$67.20$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNUHSBCWFC
P/E now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 12.1x 12.8xmedian 12.1x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.4x 5.6xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -44.7xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x 12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.2x 1.6xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.36 1.95median 1.36 1.10median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNUHSBCWFC
Revenue $19.34B $55.61B $87.23B
Gross profit $7.97B – –
Operating income $4.39B $30.80B –
Net income $3.61B $26.01B –
Free cash flow -$1.36B – –
EPS (diluted) $0.74 $7.07 $6.62
Cash & equivalents $13.55B $227.80B –
Total debt $14.55B – –
Shares (diluted) 4.91B 3.51B 3.07B
Enterprise value $3.84B -$1.53T $251.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNUHSBCWFC
P/E 16.9x 12.8x 12.4x
P/FCF -44.7x – 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow -44.0x – –
P/S 3.1x 5.6x 2.9x
P/B 4.6x 1.6x –
P/Tangible book 4.9x 1.6x –
EV/EBITDA 11.5x – –
EV/EBIT 11.8x 2.8x –
EV/Revenue 2.7x 1.5x 2.9x
EV/FCF -38.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -37.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 1.95 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNUHSBCWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.5% 2,726% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 45.8% 4.0% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 38.6% 25.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 132.2% 4.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 56.9% 31.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 260.8% 0.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 56.2% 46.4% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 603.5% 6.6% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -135.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.5% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNUHSBCWFC
Gross margin 41.2% – –
EBITDA margin 23.4% – –
Operating margin 22.7% 55.4% –
Pretax margin 22.7% 60.5% –
Net margin 18.7% 44.6% –
FCF margin -7.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin -7.1% – –
Return on equity 24.5% 13.2% –
Return on assets 4.0% 0.8% –
Return on invested capital 18.1% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNUHSBCWFC
Debt / assets 5.7% – –
Debt / equity 0.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.0x – –
Debt / FCF -3.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 84.0% 94.3% 92.1%
Equity / assets 16.0% 5.7% –
Interest coverage 1.2x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNUHSBCWFC
Dividend yield – 4.1% 2.2%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.1% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNUHSBCWFC
Forward P/E – 10.1xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.06FY2023 $9.02FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +19.5%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.1% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $42.10BFY2029 $70.05BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3,295.3%FY2029 -1.3%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.0% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNUHSBCWFC
Held by institutions 59.8% 2.5% 76.8%
Institutions holding 854 707 2,875
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -0.3% +1.1%
Institutions buying 442 402 1,290
Institutions selling 305 180 1,134
Buyers to sellers 1.45 2.23 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NUHSBCWFC
NU 1.00 0.28 0.29
HSBC 0.28 1.00 0.38
WFC 0.29 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NU, HSBC and WFC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nu Holdings (NU) $59.86B, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) $300.13B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $251.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, NU, HSBC and WFC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.6x, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 12.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is cheapest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 10.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nu Holdings (NU) +50.5%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +2,725.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has the highest net margin (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.7%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 44.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) returned the most: Nu Holdings (NU) -20.5%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +36.1%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -4.4%. Over five years, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) compounded fastest (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +24.6%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Nu Holdings (NU) 46.2%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 27.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NU, HSBC and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.