NU vs BAC vs TD Stock Comparison

Nu Holdings, Bank Of America and Toronto Dominion Bank Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.
$15.15 +11.2% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$60.77B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.34B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.57 -9.7% 1M -2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$361.10B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
TD Toronto Dominion Bank
$124.61 +4.3% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$216.31B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.75B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 6, Nu Holdings 3, Toronto Dominion Bank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNUBACTDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.77B $361.10B $216.31B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 11.2x 19.2x BAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.8x 11.1x 18.5x BAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.5% +9.7% -3.6% NU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.7% 26.5% 24.1% BAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.1% 13.1% — NU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.0x -1.6x — NU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.03% BAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% -2.3% +54.0% TD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +1.2%/yr +11.6%/yr TD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 21.9% 18.2% TD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 69/100 21/100 BAC

Percentile Scorecard

NUBACTD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNUBACTD
Valuation 6 #338 of 361 96 #16 of 361 14 #310 of 361
Growth 79 #73 of 344 80 #69 of 344 33 #230 of 344
Profitability 30 #244 of 348 71 #102 of 348 6 #326 of 348
Financial Health 71 #101 of 340 20 #271 of 340 1 #337 of 340
Shareholder Returns 9 #320 of 352 77 #82 of 352 48 #184 of 352
Overall 39 69 21
  • NU ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • BAC ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • TD ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNUBACTDSPY
1 month +11.2%-9.7%+4.3% -1.0%
3 months +7.5%-18.5%+4.0% +2.9%
6 months +4.4%-2.8%+18.6% +6.4%
Year to date -9.5%-8.1%+32.3% +11.4%
1 year -4.7%-2.3%+54.0% +13.1%
3 years +87.5%+98.5%+122.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +23.3%+25.7%+30.6% +21.5%
5 years —+6.3%+72.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+1.2%+11.6% +10.9%
10 years —+203.4%+176.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+11.7%+10.7% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureNUBACTDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%21.9%18.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.7%25.7%19.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.540.730.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.11-0.102.96 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.1%-49.0%-39.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-22.0%-0.4% -2.5%
52-week high $18.76$64.82$125.08 $779.14
52-week low $11.60$46.72$80.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNUBACTD
P/E now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 12.5x 11.3xmedian 12.5x 19.1xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.5x 2.9xmedian 3.5x 4.5xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 4.8x 1.4xmedian 4.8x 9.8xmedian 4.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -53.7xmedian 11.4x 3.7xmedian 11.4x 37.9xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.48 1.40median 1.48 4.53median 1.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNUBACTD
Revenue $19.34B $121.10B $46.75B
Gross profit $7.97B – –
Operating income $4.39B – $3.46B
Net income $3.61B $33.66B $11.69B
Free cash flow -$1.36B $94.74B $5.55B
EPS (diluted) $0.74 $4.41 $6.52
Cash & equivalents $13.55B $229.75B $4.86B
Total debt $14.55B $399.84B –
Shares (diluted) 4.91B 7.29B 1.73B
Enterprise value $4.76B -$2.01T -$459.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNUBACTD
P/E 20.3x 11.3x 19.1x
P/FCF -53.7x 3.7x 37.9x
P/Operating cash flow -53.0x 3.7x 37.9x
P/S 3.8x 2.9x 4.5x
P/B 5.5x 1.2x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 1.2x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x 1.4x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 14.6x 1.4x 14.4x
EV/Revenue 3.3x 1.4x 1.1x
EV/FCF -47.1x 1.8x 9.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -46.5x 1.8x 9.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 1.40 4.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNUBACTD
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.5% 9.7% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 45.8% 6.4% 5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 38.6% – 17.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 132.2% – 47.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 56.9% 20.5% -21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 260.8% 4.2% 2.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.2% 27.5% -20.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 603.5% 8.0% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -135.1% 517.8% -64.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.0% 28.5% 28.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.5% 517.8% -64.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.6% 28.5% 28.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNUBACTD
Gross margin 41.2% – –
EBITDA margin 23.4% 99.4% 10.9%
Operating margin 22.7% – 7.4%
Pretax margin 22.7% 36.2% -66.0%
Net margin 18.7% 26.5% 24.1%
FCF margin -7.0% 78.2% 11.9%
Operating cash flow margin -7.1% 78.2% 11.9%
Return on equity 24.5% 11.2% 12.9%
Return on assets 4.0% 1.0% 0.8%
Return on invested capital 18.1% 13.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x 2.8x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 3.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNUBACTD
Debt / assets 5.7% 11.4% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.0x -1.6x –
Debt / FCF -3.4x 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets 84.0% 91.4% 94.0%
Equity / assets 16.0% 8.6% 6.0%
Interest coverage 1.2x 1.6x 0.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNUBACTD
Dividend yield – 2.3% 3.5%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 6.6% 2.4%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 8.9% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.0% 48.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.3% 101.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% 4.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% 6.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNUBACTD
Forward P/E 16.8xFY2026 11.1xFY2026 18.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $4.57FY2026 $6.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +55.2%FY2026 +19.9%FY2026 +12.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.6% +19.0% +9.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.04BFY2026 $127.89BFY2026 $45.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.4%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026 +13.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.8% -2.5% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNUBACTD
Held by institutions 59.8% 75.0% 45.9%
Institutions holding 854 3,612 900
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +0.7% -1.2%
Institutions buying 442 1,825 385
Institutions selling 305 1,342 304
Buyers to sellers 1.45 1.36 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NUBACTD
NU 1.00 0.34 0.29
BAC 0.34 1.00 0.51
TD 0.29 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NU, BAC and TD?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nu Holdings (NU) $60.77B, Bank Of America (BAC) $361.10B, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) $216.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, NU, BAC and TD?

Bank Of America (BAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.8x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 19.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bank Of America (BAC) is cheapest (Nu Holdings (NU) 16.8x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.1x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nu Holdings (NU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nu Holdings (NU) +50.5%, Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bank Of America (BAC) has the highest net margin (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.7%, Bank Of America (BAC) 26.5%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 24.1%). On return on invested capital, Nu Holdings (NU) leads (Nu Holdings (NU) 18.1%, Bank Of America (BAC) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) returned the most: Nu Holdings (NU) -4.7%, Bank Of America (BAC) -2.3%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +54.0%. Over five years, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) compounded fastest (Bank Of America (BAC) +1.2%/yr, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bank Of America (BAC) has the highest dividend yield: Nu Holdings (NU) 0.00%, Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 0.03%. Nu Holdings (NU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has been the steadiest (Nu Holdings (NU) 42.2%, Bank Of America (BAC) 21.9%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NU, BAC and TD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.