NTSK vs FTNT vs GEN Stock Comparison

Netskope, Fortinet and Gen Digital Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ZS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NTSK Netskope Inc
$21.67 +10.3% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$8.84B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$802.64M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$122.51 -35.9% 1M +42.5% 1Y
Market cap
$90.00B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
7 wins
GEN Gen Digital Inc.
$30.60 +34.2% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.15B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.23B
Div. yield
1.67%
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 7, Gen Digital 3, Netskope 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTSKFTNTGENLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.84B $90.00B $18.15B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -11.9x 39.4x 15.1x GEN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.1x 9.9x GEN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.4% +20.2% +16.9% NTSK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -91.8% 29.0% 23.1% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 88.9% 14.4% FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.4x 2.8x FTNT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 1.67% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% +42.5% +18.4% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.4%/yr +4.3%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.9% 49.7% 43.1% GEN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 70/100 69/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

NTSKFTNTGEN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTSKFTNTGEN
Valuation 11 #110 of 124 63 #47 of 124 82 #23 of 124
Growth 36 #73 of 114 66 #39 of 114 62 #44 of 114
Profitability 24 #85 of 111 100 #1 of 111 96 #6 of 111
Financial Health 31 #89 of 128 57 #56 of 128 15 #109 of 128
Shareholder Returns 11 #66 of 74 64 #27 of 74 89 #9 of 74
Overall 23 70 69
  • NTSK ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GEN ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTSKFTNTGENSPY
1 month +10.3%-35.9%+34.2% -5.9%
3 months +60.8%-23.5%+8.9% -4.6%
6 months +90.1%+13.5%+51.6% +0.2%
Year to date +23.5%+54.3%+12.5% +7.5%
1 year -4.7%+42.5%+18.4% +8.2%
3 years —+144.5%+75.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year —+34.8%+20.6% +19.0%
5 years —+79.5%+23.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year —+12.4%+4.3% +9.4%
10 years —+1,882.4%+30.3% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+34.8%+2.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureNTSKFTNTGENSPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.9%49.7%43.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.3%52.5%41.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.811.070.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.060.850.43 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.0%-38.3%-49.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.3%-37.1%-2.6% -5.9%
52-week high $26.52$194.75$31.41 $779.14
52-week low $7.73$75.23$17.89 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTSKFTNTGEN
P/E now vs peer median -11.9xmedian 39.4x 39.4xmedian 39.4x 15.1xmedian 39.4x
P/S now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 4.0x 11.4xmedian 4.0x 3.5xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.8xmedian 34.1x 27.3xmedian 34.1x 9.6xmedian 34.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -126.0xmedian 22.7x 26.2xmedian 22.7x 10.3xmedian 22.7x
P/B now vs peer median 56.4xmedian 2.9x 40.1xmedian 2.9x 6.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.32 1.39median 1.32 -5.56median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTSKFTNTGEN
Revenue $802.64M $7.88B $5.23B
Gross profit $561.19M $6.29B $4.05B
Operating income -$759.79M $2.60B $2.19B
Net income -$737.16M $2.28B $1.21B
Free cash flow -$70.14M $3.43B $1.76B
R&D $575.79M $857.40M $430.00M
EPS (diluted) $-1.82 $3.07 $2.00
Cash & equivalents $220.85M $3.75B $589.00M
Total debt – $497.10M $8.12B
Shares (diluted) 405.05M 742.60M 603.00M
Enterprise value $4.36B $74.25B $15.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTSKFTNTGEN
P/E -11.9x 39.4x 15.1x
P/FCF -126.0x 26.2x 10.3x
P/Operating cash flow -215.1x 24.4x 10.2x
P/S 11.0x 11.4x 3.5x
P/B 56.4x 40.1x 6.6x
P/Tangible book 64.0x 41.4x 22.3x
EV/EBITDA -11.8x 27.3x 9.6x
EV/EBIT -10.2x 33.0x 11.7x
EV/Revenue 9.7x 10.9x 4.9x
EV/FCF -110.8x 25.0x 14.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -189.2x 23.2x 14.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.39 -5.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTSKFTNTGEN
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.4% 20.2% 16.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.1% 11.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32.4% 18.6% 14.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.7% 10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -307.8% 27.8% 30.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 28.9% 26.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -132.3% 21.8% 111.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 25.6% -4.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.0% 24.9% 118.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 28.3% -2.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 50.6% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.5% 22.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 69.2% 35.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 22.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTSKFTNTGEN
Gross margin 69.9% 79.7% 77.4%
EBITDA margin -82.0% 39.8% 51.2%
Operating margin -94.7% 33.0% 41.8%
Pretax margin -90.3% 35.3% 32.3%
Net margin -91.8% 29.0% 23.1%
FCF margin -8.7% 43.5% 33.7%
Operating cash flow margin -5.1% 46.8% 34.0%
Return on equity -443.7% 120.1% 44.7%
Return on assets -43.3% 20.0% 7.7%
Return on invested capital – 88.9% 14.4%
Return on capital employed -75.1% 41.2% 18.0%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.6x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 79.4% 3.9% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTSKFTNTGEN
Debt / assets – 4.2% 52.2%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 3.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.4x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 0.1x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 90.8% 81.2% 82.4%
Equity / assets 9.2% 18.8% 17.6%
Interest coverage – 175.6x 4.3x
Current ratio 2.0x 1.4x 0.4x
Quick ratio 1.8x 1.2x 0.3x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 0.57 7.19 1.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTSKFTNTGEN
Dividend yield – – 1.7%
Net buyback yield -11.7% 1.0% 4.2%
Shareholder yield -11.7% 1.0% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTSKFTNTGEN
Forward P/E – 33.1xFY2026 9.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.16FY2026 $3.70FY2026 $3.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +34.1%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +0.5% +9.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $868.74MFY2026 $8.43BFY2026 $5.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.5%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026 +14.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +28.8% +13.4% +8.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTSKFTNTGEN
Held by institutions 45.9% 68.6% 89.1%
Institutions holding 204 1,570 690
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.5% +23.7% +3.8%
Institutions buying 154 855 391
Institutions selling 30 551 212
Buyers to sellers 5.13 1.55 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTSKFTNTGEN
NTSK 1.00 0.47 0.34
FTNT 0.47 1.00 0.16
GEN 0.34 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTSK, FTNT and GEN?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Netskope (NTSK) $8.84B, Fortinet (FTNT) $90.00B, Gen Digital (GEN) $18.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, NTSK, FTNT and GEN?

Gen Digital (GEN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Netskope (NTSK) -11.9x, Fortinet (FTNT) 39.4x, Gen Digital (GEN) 15.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gen Digital (GEN) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 33.1x, Gen Digital (GEN) 9.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Netskope (NTSK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Netskope (NTSK) +30.4%, Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%, Gen Digital (GEN) +16.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Netskope (NTSK) -91.8%, Fortinet (FTNT) 29.0%, Gen Digital (GEN) 23.1%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (Fortinet (FTNT) 88.9%, Gen Digital (GEN) 14.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: Netskope (NTSK) -4.7%, Fortinet (FTNT) +42.5%, Gen Digital (GEN) +18.4%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +12.4%/yr, Gen Digital (GEN) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gen Digital (GEN) 1.67%. Netskope (NTSK) and Fortinet (FTNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gen Digital (GEN) has been the steadiest (Netskope (NTSK) 77.9%, Fortinet (FTNT) 49.7%, Gen Digital (GEN) 43.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTSK, FTNT and GEN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.