NTPIF vs FPH vs JOE Stock Comparison

Nam Tai Property, Five Point Holdings and St Joe Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FOR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NTPIF Nam Tai Property Inc.
$4.30 0.0% 1M +7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$260.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$37.86M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.26 -9.0% 1M -29.6% 1Y
Market cap
$630.55M
P/E
11.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
5 wins
JOE ST JOE Co
$69.86 +5.8% 1M +17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95B
P/E
32.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$542.95M
Div. yield
0.92%
Real Estate Development Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

St Joe leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (St Joe 6, Five Point Holdings 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTPIFFPHJOELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $260.36M $630.55M $3.95B JOE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.8x 11.0x 32.7x FPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 3.9x 36.0x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.9% -39.1% +11.1% JOE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -46.5% 24.9% 22.3% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.0% -4.0% — FPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -0.7x — FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.92% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.2% -29.6% +17.4% JOE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -28.7%/yr -10.4%/yr +7.1%/yr JOE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.1% 31.1% 28.3% JOE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 55/100 66/100 JOE

Percentile Scorecard

NTPIFFPHJOE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTPIFFPHJOE
Valuation 0 #38 of 38 68 #13 of 38 57 #17 of 38
Growth 24 #26 of 34 33 #23 of 34 73 #10 of 34
Profitability 20 #25 of 31 43 #18 of 31 83 #6 of 31
Financial Health 35 #25 of 38 76 #10 of 38 62 #15 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 57 #7 of 15
Overall 20 55 66
  • NTPIF ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • FPH ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • JOE ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTPIFFPHJOESPY
1 month 0.0%-9.0%+5.8% -5.9%
3 months -4.4%-17.4%+3.8% -4.6%
6 months -14.9%-12.5%+7.4% +0.2%
Year to date 0.0%-23.8%+17.7% +7.5%
1 year +7.2%-29.6%+17.4% +8.2%
3 years +22.9%+65.8%+43.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +7.1%+18.4%+12.8% +19.0%
5 years -81.6%-42.2%+40.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -28.7%-10.4%+7.1% +9.4%
10 years -45.2%—+308.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year -5.8%—+15.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureNTPIFFPHJOESPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.1%31.1%28.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.5%32.3%26.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.080.690.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.19-0.950.62 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-72.3%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.5%-32.4%-4.0% -5.9%
52-week high $5.85$6.30$72.79 $779.14
52-week low $3.85$4.08$55.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTPIFFPHJOE
P/E now vs peer median -14.8xmedian 7.4x 11.0xmedian 7.4x 32.7xmedian 7.4x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 4.9x 5.3xmedian 4.9x 7.3xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 11.2x -5.8xmedian 11.2x 17.4xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -7.2xmedian 5.6x 104.9xmedian 5.6x 25.1xmedian 5.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x 5.1xmedian 0.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.54 0.34median 0.54 3.15median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTPIFFPHJOE
Revenue $37.86M $118.00M $542.95M
Gross profit $7.74M -$10.11M $250.51M
Operating income -$14.72M -$131.54M $173.94M
Net income -$17.60M $79.23M $120.57M
Free cash flow -$36.27M $6.01M $157.37M
EPS (diluted) $-0.29 $0.39 $2.14
Cash & equivalents $38.49M $358.72M $117.86M
Total debt $190.39M $444.40M –
Shares (diluted) 60.90M 76.10M 56.76M
Enterprise value $56.58M $648.27M $3.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTPIFFPHJOE
P/E -14.8x 11.0x 32.7x
P/FCF -7.2x 104.9x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow -7.1x 99.4x 21.0x
P/S 6.9x 5.3x 7.3x
P/B 1.4x 0.3x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.3x 5.1x
EV/EBITDA 0.1x -5.8x 17.4x
EV/EBIT -28.0x -5.4x 22.0x
EV/Revenue 10.9x 6.1x 7.1x
EV/FCF -11.4x 119.2x 24.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -11.3x 112.9x 20.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.34 3.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFFPHJOE
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.9% -39.1% 11.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 14.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -52.1% 90.0% 21.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.5% 51.4% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.7% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -132.3% -67.8% 15.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% 10.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -131.6% -6.4% 18.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 32.9% 10.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 62.8% -97.0% 6.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -50.3% 19.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.0% -97.1% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -51.2% 52.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFFPHJOE
Gross margin 20.4% -8.6% 46.1%
EBITDA margin 12,108% -103.9% 40.6%
Operating margin -38.9% -111.5% 32.0%
Pretax margin -53.1% 79.1% 29.8%
Net margin -46.5% 24.9% 22.3%
FCF margin -95.8% 5.1% 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin -96.4% 5.4% 34.7%
Return on equity -9.5% 3.4% 15.6%
Return on assets -3.7% 2.5% 8.0%
Return on invested capital -4.0% -4.0% –
Return on capital employed -3.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 0.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 12.4% 7.0% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTPIFFPHJOE
Debt / assets 40.3% 13.8% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -0.7x –
Debt / FCF -5.2x 73.9x –
Liabilities / assets 62.0% 27.7% 48.4%
Equity / assets 38.0% 72.3% 51.6%
Interest coverage – – 6.2x
Current ratio 1.2x – –
Quick ratio 0.6x – –
Cash ratio 0.6x – –
Altman Z-score 0.11 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTPIFFPHJOE
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield – – 2.0%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 30.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 12.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTPIFFPHJOE
Forward P/E – 3.9xFY2023 36.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.09FY2023 $1.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +45.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -136.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $559.28MFY2023 $544.86MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +40.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -90.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTPIFFPHJOE
Held by institutions 9.7% 25.2% 87.6%
Institutions holding 2 88 320
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.3% -0.2%
Institutions buying 0 37 160
Institutions selling 0 28 97
Buyers to sellers – 1.32 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTPIFFPHJOE
NTPIF 1.00 -0.02 -0.05
FPH -0.02 1.00 0.26
JOE -0.05 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTPIF, FPH and JOE?

St Joe (JOE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) $260.36M, Five Point Holdings (FPH) $630.55M, St Joe (JOE) $3.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, NTPIF, FPH and JOE?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -14.8x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 11.0x, St Joe (JOE) 32.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.9x, St Joe (JOE) 36.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

St Joe (JOE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -3.9%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, St Joe (JOE) +11.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -46.5%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, St Joe (JOE) 22.3%). On return on invested capital, Five Point Holdings (FPH) leads (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -4.0%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year St Joe (JOE) returned the most: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) +7.2%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -29.6%, St Joe (JOE) +17.4%. Over five years, St Joe (JOE) compounded fastest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -28.7%/yr, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -10.4%/yr, St Joe (JOE) +7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 0.00%, St Joe (JOE) 0.92%. Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) and Five Point Holdings (FPH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, St Joe (JOE) has been the steadiest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 37.1%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 31.1%, St Joe (JOE) 28.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTPIF, FPH and JOE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, St Joe (JOE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.