NTPIF vs AWCA vs GEDC Stock Comparison

Nam Tai Property, Awaysis Capital and TerraVolt Holdings Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HHH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NTPIF Nam Tai Property Inc.
$4.30 0.0% 1M +4.9% 1Y
Market cap
$260.01M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$37.86M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
AWCA Awaysis Capital, Inc.
$0.02 -50.0% 1M -91.7% 1Y
Market cap
$9.53M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Nam Tai Property leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Nam Tai Property 4, Awaysis Capital 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTPIFAWCAGEDCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $260.01M $9.53M $9.78M NTPIF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.8x -3.7x -1.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.9% +191.6% — AWCA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -46.5% -201.1% — NTPIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -4.1x — AWCA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.9% -91.7% -22.4% NTPIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -29.1%/yr -19.7%/yr -37.5%/yr AWCA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.7% 345.8% 357.0% NTPIF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 24/100 11/100 AWCA

Percentile Scorecard

NTPIFAWCAGEDC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Valuation 0 #38 of 38 5 #36 of 38 11 #34 of 38
Growth 25 #25 of 33 75 #9 of 33 22 #26 of 33
Profitability 17 #26 of 31 10 #28 of 31 –
Financial Health 31 #26 of 37 6 #35 of 37 0 #37 of 37
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 18 24 11
  • NTPIF ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • AWCA ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • GEDC ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTPIFAWCAGEDCSPY
1 month 0.0%-50.0%-24.0% -2.0%
3 months 0.0%-33.3%-37.7% -2.2%
6 months -14.9%-33.3%-24.0% +4.2%
Year to date 0.0%-83.3%+8.6% +10.6%
1 year +4.9%-91.7%-22.4% +10.4%
3 years +15.0%-94.3%-29.6% +73.6%
3 years, per year +4.8%-61.5%-11.1% +20.2%
5 years -82.0%-66.7%-90.5% +61.6%
5 years, per year -29.1%-19.7%-37.5% +10.1%
10 years -46.9%-66.7%-78.3% +261.3%
10 years, per year -6.1%-10.4%-14.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNTPIFAWCAGEDCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.7%345.8%357.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.9%662.7%522.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.04-0.83-1.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.13-0.27-0.06 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.2%-98.7%-99.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.5%-91.7%-51.9% -3.2%
52-week high $5.85$0.24$0.79 $779.14
52-week low $3.85$0.02$0.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTPIFAWCAGEDC
P/E now vs peer median -14.8xmedian 7.3x -3.1xmedian 7.3x -1.4xmedian 7.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 4.7x 6.4xmedian 4.7x —median 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 10.3x -7.5xmedian 10.3x —median 10.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -7.2xmedian 5.6x -10.2xmedian 5.6x -11.8xmedian 5.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.4xmedian 0.6x -3.0xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.36 -0.08median 0.36 0.03median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Revenue $37.86M $1.29M –
Gross profit $7.74M $621.41K –
Operating income -$14.72M -$2.54M -$1.43M
Net income -$17.60M -$2.59M -$7.07M
Free cash flow -$36.27M -$801.04K -$829.00K
EPS (diluted) $-0.29 $-0.01 $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $38.49M $380.77K $63.00K
Total debt $190.39M $10.05M $3.48M
Shares (diluted) 60.90M 397.06M 25.73M
Enterprise value $56.24M $7.87M $9.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAGEDC
P/E -14.8x -3.1x -1.4x
P/FCF -7.2x -10.2x -11.8x
P/Operating cash flow -7.1x -10.4x -11.8x
P/S 6.9x 6.4x –
P/B 1.4x 1.4x -3.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.4x -3.0x
EV/EBITDA 0.1x -7.5x –
EV/EBIT -28.0x -7.0x -9.2x
EV/Revenue 10.9x 13.9x –
EV/FCF -11.4x -22.3x -15.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -11.3x -22.7x -15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.08 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.9% 191.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 73.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -52.1% 21.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.5% 5.8% -44.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% -30.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -132.3% 5.1% -21.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 15.6% -47.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -131.6% 10.1% -21.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 37.3% -46.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 62.8% 83.6% -4.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -45.2% -8.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.0% 86.3% -4.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -36.9% -0.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Gross margin 20.4% 48.3% –
EBITDA margin 12,108% -185.4% –
Operating margin -38.9% -197.8% –
Pretax margin -53.1% -201.1% –
Net margin -46.5% -201.1% –
FCF margin -95.8% -62.3% –
Operating cash flow margin -96.4% -61.3% –
Return on equity -9.5% -42.3% –
Return on assets -3.7% -14.4% -3,915%
Return on invested capital -4.0% – –
Return on capital employed -3.7% -36.9% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 0.3x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 12.4% 11.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Debt / assets 40.3% 56.8% 5,271%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.7x -1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -4.1x –
Debt / FCF -5.2x -12.5x -4.2x
Liabilities / assets 62.0% 67.4% 5,082%
Equity / assets 38.0% 32.6% -4,982%
Interest coverage – -29.9x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 0.11 -1.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTPIFAWCAGEDC

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTPIFAWCAGEDC
Held by institutions 9.7% – –
Institutions holding 2 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ – – –
Institutions buying 0 – –
Institutions selling 0 – –
Buyers to sellers – – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTPIFAWCAGEDC
NTPIF 1.00 -0.07 -0.05
AWCA -0.07 1.00 0.03
GEDC -0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTPIF, AWCA and GEDC?

Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) $260.01M, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) $9.53M, TerraVolt Holdings (GEDC) $9.78M.

Which company is growing faster?

Awaysis Capital (AWCA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -3.9%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) +191.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) has the highest net margin (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -46.5%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -201.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) returned the most: Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) +4.9%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -91.7%, TerraVolt Holdings (GEDC) -22.4%. Over five years, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) compounded fastest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) -29.1%/yr, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -19.7%/yr, TerraVolt Holdings (GEDC) -37.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) has been the steadiest (Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) 36.7%, Awaysis Capital (AWCA) 345.8%, TerraVolt Holdings (GEDC) 357.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTPIF, AWCA and GEDC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nam Tai Property (NTPIF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.