NTES vs RLNDF vs GCL Stock Comparison

NetEase, RoyaLand and GCL Global Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
NTES NetEase, Inc.
$118.32 +2.5% 1M -19.4% 1Y
Market cap
$75.54B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.70B
Div. yield
2.48%
Video Games Technology
2 wins
RLNDF RoyaLand Co Ltd.
$3.00 -14.3% 1M +200.0% 1Y
Market cap
$41.93M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

NetEase leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (NetEase 2, RoyaLand 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNTESRLNDFGCLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $75.54B $41.93M $117.77M NTES
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.9x -1,048,125,000x -4.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.8% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.48% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.4% +200.0% -50.3% RLNDF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.4%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.1% — 121.1% NTES
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

NTESRLNDFGCL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNTESRLNDFGCL
Valuation 60 #37 of 90 – 36 #58 of 90
Growth 45 #42 of 75 – –
Profitability 97 #3 of 75 – –
Financial Health 81 #20 of 99 6 #93 of 99 27 #73 of 99
Shareholder Returns 46 #20 of 36 – –
Overall 66 – –
  • NTES ranked among 102 companies in Internet Platforms
  • RLNDF ranked among 102 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GCL ranked among 102 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNTESRLNDFGCLSPY
1 month +2.5%-14.3%+22.7% -0.8%
3 months -4.4%+20.0%+100.0% +3.5%
6 months +6.3%+252.9%+73.6% +7.0%
Year to date -14.0%+200.0%-14.0% +12.2%
1 year -19.4%+200.0%-50.3% +13.0%
3 years +10.8%—-91.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +3.5%—-55.9% +23.1%
5 years +17.9%—— +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.4%—— +11.0%
10 years +122.6%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.3%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNTESRLNDFGCLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.1%—121.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.6%—119.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.50—2.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58—-0.42 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.0%-99.4%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.8%-86.7%-50.3% -1.8%
52-week high $147.56$22.50$1.85 $779.14
52-week low $109.26$0.01$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNTESRLNDFGCL
P/E now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 17.9x -1,048,125,000xmedian 17.9x -4.5xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 1.7x —median 1.7x 0.5xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 11.8x —median 11.8x —median 11.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 10.1x —median 10.1x -10.1xmedian 10.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 1.2x -122.7xmedian 1.2x 2.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.36median 0.38 —median 0.38 —median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNTESRLNDFGCL
Revenue $16.70B – –
Gross profit $11.22B – –
Operating income $5.90B – –
Net income $4.75B – –
Free cash flow $7.46B – –
R&D $2.59B – –
EPS (diluted) $6.91 – –
Cash & equivalents $3.36B $31.71K $36.58M
Total debt $5.39B – –
Shares (diluted) 643.63M 13.98M 123.23M
Enterprise value $34.42B $41.33M $40.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNTESRLNDFGCL
P/E 16.9x -1,048,125,000x -4.5x
P/FCF 10.1x – -10.1x
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x – –
P/S 4.5x – 0.5x
P/B 3.1x -122.7x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 3.1x -122.7x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA 10.7x – –
EV/EBIT 11.3x – –
EV/Revenue 4.0x – –
EV/FCF 8.9x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.36 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNTESRLNDFGCL
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.8% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 23.6% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -2.8% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -4.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.2% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNTESRLNDFGCL
Gross margin 67.2% – –
EBITDA margin 37.2% – –
Operating margin 35.3% – –
Pretax margin 34.9% – –
Net margin 26.6% – –
FCF margin 44.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin 44.0% – –
Return on equity 19.6% – –
Return on assets 14.0% – –
Return on invested capital 22.7% – –
Return on capital employed 23.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x – –
Stock comp / revenue 2.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNTESRLNDFGCL
Debt / assets 5.4% – 30.1%
Debt / equity 0.1x – 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 28.0% 782.0% 77.7%
Equity / assets 72.0% -682.0% 22.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.5x 0.1x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 7.44 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNTESRLNDFGCL
Dividend yield 2.5% – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 2.5% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNTESRLNDFGCL
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.56FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +7.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.10BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +6.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +7.4% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNTESRLNDFGCL
Held by institutions 9.2% – –
Institutions holding 458 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% – –
Institutions buying 261 – –
Institutions selling 121 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.16 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NTESRLNDFGCL
NTES 1.00 – -0.03
RLNDF – – –
GCL -0.03 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NTES, RLNDF and GCL?

NetEase (NTES) is the largest by market capitalisation: NetEase (NTES) $75.54B, RoyaLand (RLNDF) $41.93M, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) $117.77M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RoyaLand (RLNDF) returned the most: NetEase (NTES) -19.4%, RoyaLand (RLNDF) +200.0%, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) -50.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: NetEase (NTES) 2.48%. RoyaLand (RLNDF) and GCL Global Holdings (GCL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetEase (NTES) has been the steadiest (NetEase (NTES) 33.1%, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) 121.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NTES, RLNDF and GCL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetEase (NTES) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.