NRG vs SU vs TAC Stock Comparison

Nrg Energy, Suncor Energy and Transalta Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NRG Nrg Energy, Inc.
$92.32 -8.3% 1M -43.6% 1Y
Market cap
$19.73B
P/E
25.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.13B
Div. yield
0.02%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
5 wins
SU Suncor Energy Inc
$79.35 +16.8% 1M +100.3% 1Y
Market cap
$96.91B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
-$3.60B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
7 wins
TAC Transalta Corp
$12.23 +2.3% 1M -29.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.64B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Independent Power Producers Utilities

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Suncor Energy leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Suncor Energy 7, Nrg Energy 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNRGSUTACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.73B $96.91B $3.64B SU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.2x 7.1x -66.6x SU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.8x 9.0x 55.6x SU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.8% -108.8% -8.8% NRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.4% — -3.3% NRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% — 0.0% NRG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.2x 0.5x 4.8x SU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% -0.03% 0.01% NRG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.6% +100.3% -29.0% SU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.5%/yr +28.3%/yr +1.2%/yr SU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.0% 27.4% 40.7% SU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 64/100 46/100 NRG

Percentile Scorecard

NRGSUTAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNRGSUTAC
Valuation 65 #9 of 24 76 #25 of 99 70 #8 of 24
Growth 77 #6 of 23 65 #35 of 97 27 #17 of 23
Profitability 73 #7 of 23 72 #28 of 96 55 #11 of 23
Financial Health 17 #20 of 24 74 #27 of 102 30 #17 of 24
Shareholder Returns 90 #3 of 20 35 #50 of 76 47 #11 of 20
Overall 64 64 46
  • NRG ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • SU ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • TAC ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNRGSUTACSPY
1 month -8.3%+16.8%+2.3% -1.0%
3 months -34.5%+20.6%-10.7% +2.9%
6 months -42.2%+24.0%-2.1% +6.4%
Year to date -42.0%+78.9%-3.2% +11.4%
1 year -43.6%+100.3%-29.0% +13.1%
3 years +119.4%+141.5%+60.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +30.0%+34.2%+17.1% +21.5%
5 years +123.9%+247.1%+6.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +17.5%+28.3%+1.2% +10.9%
10 years +701.4%+169.7%+165.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +23.1%+10.4%+10.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureNRGSUTACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.0%27.4%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.6%28.2%44.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.41-0.381.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.873.66-0.71 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.8%-37.3%-48.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.8%0.0%-31.0% -2.5%
52-week high $184.03$79.35$17.73 $779.14
52-week low $92.32$39.51$11.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNRGSUTAC
P/E now vs peer median 24.9xmedian 24.1x 7.1xmedian 13.1x -66.4xmedian 24.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x -26.3xmedian 2.0x 2.2xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 11.3x 11.4xmedian 5.7x 11.3xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.8xmedian 12.9x 4.8xmedian 11.1x 12.9xmedian 12.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.1x 2.0xmedian 1.5x 2.8xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 0.59 0.19median 2.24 2.09median 0.59

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNRGSUTAC
Revenue $33.13B -$3.60B $1.64B
Gross profit $6.23B – $1.05B
Operating income $2.02B $1.71B $201.41M
Net income $849.00M $8.93B -$17.93M
Free cash flow $348.00M $19.78B $281.42M
EPS (diluted) $3.69 $11.22 $-0.18
Cash & equivalents $162.00M $5.37B $212.54M
Total debt $23.44B $9.85B $2.98B
Shares (diluted) 212.00M 1.22B 297.00M
Enterprise value $13.95B $82.66B $2.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNRGSUTAC
P/E 24.9x 7.1x -66.4x
P/FCF 55.8x 4.8x 12.9x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 6.0x 7.5x
P/S 0.6x -26.3x 2.2x
P/B 4.0x 2.0x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 7.2x 2.0x 3.2x
EV/EBITDA 11.3x 11.4x 11.3x
EV/EBIT 21.2x 58.1x 31.3x
EV/Revenue 1.3x -27.6x 3.8x
EV/FCF 122.7x 5.0x 22.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.5x 6.3x 13.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 0.19 2.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNRGSUTAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.8% -108.8% -8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% -27.6% -14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.9% – -4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 348.5% – -12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 57.9% 18.0% 44.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.0% – -29.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 57.7% 81.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 34.1% 13.8% -27.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 58.9% 55.0% 60.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 34.1% 36.9% -31.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.1% 9.5% 9.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.9% 8.9% -14.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.0% 5.0% 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.6% 17.4% -2.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNRGSUTAC
Gross margin 18.8% – 63.9%
EBITDA margin 11.4% – 34.0%
Operating margin 6.1% – 12.3%
Pretax margin 3.2% – 0.4%
Net margin 2.4% – -3.3%
FCF margin 1.1% – 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin 4.7% -438.8% 29.4%
Return on equity 17.5% 29.1% -1.5%
Return on assets 2.1% 14.6% -0.3%
Return on invested capital 5.8% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed 6.7% 2.1% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.8x -26.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% -3.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNRGSUTAC
Debt / assets 58.7% 10.4% 47.9%
Debt / equity 4.8x 0.2x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.2x 0.5x 4.8x
Debt / FCF 67.3x 0.5x 10.6x
Liabilities / assets 87.8% 49.2% 79.1%
Equity / assets 12.2% 50.8% 20.9%
Interest coverage 2.0x – 0.8x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.7x –
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score 1.40 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNRGSUTAC
Dividend yield 2.0% 3.0% 2.3%
Net buyback yield 8.4% -3.9% -6.3%
Shareholder yield 10.5% -0.8% -4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 51.7% 31.6% -193.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 126.1% 14.3% 12.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.6% -0.7% -5.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.1% -1.4% 3.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNRGSUTAC
Forward P/E 10.8xFY2026 9.0xFY2026 55.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.55FY2026 $8.85FY2026 $0.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +163.4%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.5% -17.9% +72.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $36.32BFY2026 $44.77BFY2026 $1.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026 -20.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.9% -11.0% +24.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNRGSUTAC
Held by institutions 93.7% 65.2% –
Institutions holding 1,023 752 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% -5.1% –
Institutions buying 508 367 –
Institutions selling 385 252 –
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.46 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NRGSUTAC
NRG 1.00 0.02 0.40
SU 0.02 1.00 0.08
TAC 0.40 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NRG, SU and TAC?

Suncor Energy (SU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nrg Energy (NRG) $19.73B, Suncor Energy (SU) $96.91B, Transalta (TAC) $3.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, NRG, SU and TAC?

Suncor Energy (SU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nrg Energy (NRG) 25.2x, Suncor Energy (SU) 7.1x, Transalta (TAC) -66.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Suncor Energy (SU) is cheapest (Nrg Energy (NRG) 10.8x, Suncor Energy (SU) 9.0x, Transalta (TAC) 55.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nrg Energy (NRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nrg Energy (NRG) +12.8%, Suncor Energy (SU) -108.8%, Transalta (TAC) -8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nrg Energy (NRG) has the highest net margin (Nrg Energy (NRG) 2.4%, Transalta (TAC) -3.3%). On return on invested capital, Nrg Energy (NRG) leads (Nrg Energy (NRG) 5.8%, Transalta (TAC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Suncor Energy (SU) returned the most: Nrg Energy (NRG) -43.6%, Suncor Energy (SU) +100.3%, Transalta (TAC) -29.0%. Over five years, Suncor Energy (SU) compounded fastest (Nrg Energy (NRG) +17.5%/yr, Suncor Energy (SU) +28.3%/yr, Transalta (TAC) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Nrg Energy (NRG) has the highest dividend yield: Nrg Energy (NRG) 0.02%, Suncor Energy (SU) -0.03%, Transalta (TAC) 0.01%. Suncor Energy (SU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suncor Energy (SU) has been the steadiest (Nrg Energy (NRG) 50.0%, Suncor Energy (SU) 27.4%, Transalta (TAC) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NRG, SU and TAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Suncor Energy (SU) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.