NPO vs IR vs PH Stock Comparison

Enpro, Ingersoll Rand and Parker-Hannifin Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WTS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NPO Enpro Inc.
$269.01 -19.2% 1M +15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.69B
P/E
128.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Div. yield
0.47%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$82.78 +8.8% 1M +8.5% 1Y
Market cap
$32.12B
P/E
23.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.05B
Div. yield
0.10%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
PH Parker-Hannifin Corp
$928.43 -4.6% 1M +20.1% 1Y
Market cap
$117.03B
P/E
32.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.50B
Div. yield
0.82%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Parker-Hannifin leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Parker-Hannifin 7, Ingersoll Rand 4, Enpro 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNPOIRPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.69B $32.12B $117.03B PH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 128.7x 23.3x 32.1x IR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.4x 24.7x 24.5x PH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.3% +8.0% +8.3% NPO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.6% 17.2% 17.0% IR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.3% 10.5% 15.4% PH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.4x 1.4x IR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.47% 0.10% 0.82% PH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.9% +8.5% +20.1% PH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.8%/yr +8.1%/yr +25.0%/yr PH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.8% 33.5% 27.7% PH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 67/100 56/100 IR

Percentile Scorecard

NPOIRPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNPOIRPH
Valuation 20 #163 of 203 52 #98 of 203 24 #155 of 203
Growth 50 #96 of 189 84 #32 of 189 69 #59 of 189
Profitability 56 #83 of 187 86 #28 of 187 94 #13 of 187
Financial Health 62 #85 of 221 56 #97 of 221 44 #124 of 221
Shareholder Returns 29 #109 of 152 60 #62 of 152 49 #78 of 152
Overall 43 67 56
  • NPO ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • IR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • PH ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNPOIRPHSPY
1 month -19.2%+8.8%-4.6% -2.3%
3 months -19.5%-5.7%-6.9% -0.7%
6 months -7.1%+9.6%+7.0% +4.8%
Year to date +25.6%+4.5%+5.6% +10.3%
1 year +15.9%+8.5%+20.1% +10.3%
3 years +126.7%+26.7%+131.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year +31.4%+8.2%+32.3% +20.1%
5 years +190.8%+47.7%+205.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year +23.8%+8.1%+25.0% +10.1%
10 years +409.1%—+674.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year +17.7%—+22.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNPOIRPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.8%33.5%27.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.7%31.4%27.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.871.180.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.390.250.73 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.2%-36.6%-29.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.6%-16.2%-13.5% -3.5%
52-week high $387.65$98.76$1,073.86 $779.14
52-week low $202.55$68.54$768.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNPOIRPH
P/E now vs peer median 128.7xmedian 25.6x 23.3xmedian 25.6x 32.1xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 1.9x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 5.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 14.4x 14.9xmedian 14.4x 22.4xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.1xmedian 22.5x 21.2xmedian 22.5x 30.0xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x 7.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -3.47median 1.36 0.99median 1.36 1.53median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNPOIRPH
Revenue $1.22B $8.05B $21.50B
Gross profit $523.50M $3.47B $8.10B
Operating income $175.30M $1.84B $4.63B
Net income $44.10M $1.39B $3.65B
Free cash flow $167.00M $1.52B $3.91B
EPS (diluted) $2.06 $3.53 $28.48
Cash & equivalents $77.00M $1.34B $501.00M
Total debt $575.50M $4.74B $8.52B
Shares (diluted) 21.40M 391.90M 128.10M
Enterprise value $5.29B $27.14B $115.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNPOIRPH
P/E 128.7x 23.3x 32.1x
P/FCF 34.1x 21.2x 30.0x
P/Operating cash flow 26.0x 19.6x 26.8x
P/S 4.7x 4.0x 5.4x
P/B 3.6x 3.0x 7.6x
P/Tangible book 7.1x 4.9x 14.4x
EV/EBITDA 21.9x 14.9x 22.4x
EV/EBIT 35.3x 19.3x 27.0x
EV/Revenue 5.1x 4.4x 5.8x
EV/FCF 37.1x 23.4x 32.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.3x 21.6x 28.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.47 0.99 1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNPOIRPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.3% 8.0% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 6.4% 4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.2% 6.4% 10.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.4% 8.0% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.0% 62.6% 14.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 78.0% 18.6% 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -47.9% 152.7% 3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -36.2% 21.7% 20.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.4% 158.7% 5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -37.1% 23.5% 21.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.3% 18.8% 15.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.6% 12.6% 13.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 9.4% 21.4% 16.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 13.4% 14.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNPOIRPH
Gross margin 42.8% 43.1% 37.7%
EBITDA margin 23.1% 29.7% 25.9%
Operating margin 14.3% 22.9% 21.6%
Pretax margin 4.6% 20.1% 21.2%
Net margin 3.6% 17.2% 17.0%
FCF margin 13.6% 18.8% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin 17.9% 20.4% 20.3%
Return on equity 2.8% 13.4% 24.3%
Return on assets 1.7% 7.6% 11.9%
Return on invested capital 6.3% 10.5% 15.4%
Return on capital employed 7.2% 11.8% 18.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.0x 1.2x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.7% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNPOIRPH
Debt / assets 21.6% 25.4% 27.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.4x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.4x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 3.4x 3.1x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 40.3% 43.2% 50.1%
Equity / assets 59.7% 56.8% 49.9%
Interest coverage 5.2x 7.2x 11.6x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.7x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.62 3.59 6.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNPOIRPH
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.1% 0.8%
Net buyback yield 0.2% 3.1% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 3.2% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 60.8% 2.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.0% 2.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.9% -3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.9% -1.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNPOIRPH
Forward P/E 27.4xFY2026 24.7xFY2026 24.5xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $9.81FY2026 $3.35FY2026 $37.94FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +24.0%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026 +17.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +17.6% +21.5% +8.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.40BFY2026 $8.35BFY2026 $23.49BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +23.0%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026 +9.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +8.1% +6.4% +22.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNPOIRPH
Held by institutions 99.9% 100.0% 91.8%
Institutions holding 411 896 1,977
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% -1.5% +1.2%
Institutions buying 212 369 929
Institutions selling 136 360 693
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.03 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NPOIRPH
NPO 1.00 0.54 0.55
IR 0.54 1.00 0.61
PH 0.55 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NPO, IR and PH?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enpro (NPO) $5.69B, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $32.12B, Parker-Hannifin (PH) $117.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, NPO, IR and PH?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Enpro (NPO) 128.7x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 23.3x, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 32.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Parker-Hannifin (PH) is cheapest (Enpro (NPO) 27.4x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 24.7x, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 24.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Enpro (NPO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Enpro (NPO) +13.3%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.0%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) has the highest net margin (Enpro (NPO) 3.6%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 17.2%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 17.0%). On return on invested capital, Parker-Hannifin (PH) leads (Enpro (NPO) 6.3%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 10.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 15.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Parker-Hannifin (PH) returned the most: Enpro (NPO) +15.9%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +20.1%. Over five years, Parker-Hannifin (PH) compounded fastest (Enpro (NPO) +23.8%/yr, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.1%/yr, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +25.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has the highest dividend yield: Enpro (NPO) 0.47%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.10%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 0.82%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Parker-Hannifin (PH) has been the steadiest (Enpro (NPO) 40.8%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 27.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NPO, IR and PH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Parker-Hannifin (PH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.