NP vs RYAN vs YMM Stock Comparison

Neptune Insurance Holdings, Ryan Specialty Holdings and Full Truck Alliance Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Full Truck Alliance leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Full Truck Alliance 5, Neptune Insurance Holdings 4, Ryan Specialty Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNPRYANYMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.05B $10.83B $8.76B RYAN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 90.5x 53.6x 14.4x YMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 50.8x 18.3x 11.2x YMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.8% +14.4% — NP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.7% 3.1% — NP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 512.4% 8.7% — NP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.20% 2.85% YMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.6% -20.8% -36.8% NP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +2.6%/yr -10.6%/yr RYAN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.7% 45.1% 36.3% YMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 35/100 74/100 YMM

Percentile Scorecard

NPRYANYMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNPRYANYMM
Valuation 3 #116 of 119 7 #111 of 119 84 #28 of 167
Growth 79 #25 of 114 55 #52 of 114 76 #38 of 153
Profitability 100 #1 of 110 49 #57 of 110 69 #48 of 153
Financial Health 10 #99 of 110 3 #107 of 110 94 #11 of 179
Shareholder Returns 4 #102 of 106 64 #39 of 106 50 #48 of 94
Overall 39 35 74
  • NP ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • RYAN ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNPRYANYMMSPY
1 month +7.0%+11.9%+3.6% -0.2%
3 months -7.4%-7.9%-9.6% +3.9%
6 months +10.7%+22.0%-2.8% +8.2%
Year to date +1.1%-17.9%-21.6% +12.9%
1 year +15.6%-20.8%-36.8% +12.3%
3 years —-6.3%+16.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-2.1%+5.1% +23.3%
5 years —+13.6%-42.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+2.6%-10.6% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureNPRYANYMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.7%45.1%36.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.0%47.2%40.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.12-0.331.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.26-0.46-1.01 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-61.3%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.9%-27.4%-36.8% -1.2%
52-week high $35.05$58.38$13.30 $779.14
52-week low $17.14$29.39$7.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNPRYANYMM
P/E now vs peer median 90.5xmedian 10.5x 53.6xmedian 10.5x 14.4xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 1.4x 3.4xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x 18.8xmedian 7.6x —median 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 49.3xmedian 8.5x 22.0xmedian 8.5x 8.7xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median -19.1xmedian 1.5x 10.7xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.53 -12.20median 0.53 0.36median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNPRYANYMM
Revenue $197.00M $3.22B –
Operating income $81.30M $477.27M $620.89M
Net income $44.74M $242.82M $671.27M
Free cash flow $82.04M $492.78M $1.00B
R&D – – $145.15M
EPS (diluted) $0.31 $0.75 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $17.43M $140.12M $1.00B
Total debt $922.00M $3.63B –
Shares (diluted) 146.39M 131.33M 1.05B
Enterprise value $3.99B $10.71B -$1.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNPRYANYMM
P/E 90.5x 53.6x 14.4x
P/FCF 49.3x 22.0x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 49.3x 19.4x 9.1x
P/S 20.5x 3.4x –
P/B -19.1x 10.7x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -19.1x 12.2x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 18.8x –
EV/EBIT 52.2x 30.0x 8.5x
EV/Revenue 21.5x 4.5x –
EV/FCF 51.7x 29.1x 5.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 51.7x 25.6x 5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -12.20 0.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNPRYANYMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.8% 14.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.0% -1.0% 13.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% 90.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.1% 26.8% 21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 59.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 197.9% 271.3% 4.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -4.4% 40.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 53.1% -2.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.1% -3.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNPRYANYMM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 23.7% –
Operating margin 41.3% 14.8% –
Pretax margin 34.1% 8.8% –
Net margin 22.7% 3.1% –
FCF margin 41.6% 15.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 41.6% 17.4% –
Return on equity – 21.7% 10.3%
Return on assets 43.4% 2.1% 9.3%
Return on invested capital 512.4% 8.7% –
Return on capital employed 3,191% 9.9% 10.2%
Asset turnover 1.9x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 2.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 2.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNPRYANYMM
Debt / assets 206.9% 30.4% –
Debt / equity -1.0x 3.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.6x –
Debt / FCF 2.6x 7.4x –
Liabilities / assets 303.6% 91.5% 10.4%
Equity / assets -203.6% 8.5% 89.6%
Interest coverage 5.4x – –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.0x 8.0x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.1x 6.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x 6.6x
Altman Z-score 5.68 1.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNPRYANYMM
Dividend yield – 1.2% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 2.8% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.0% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 27.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 13.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 65.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNPRYANYMM
Forward P/E 50.8xFY2026 18.3xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.58FY2026 $2.31FY2026 $0.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.5%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +25.9% +10.8% +6.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $195.39MFY2026 $3.10BFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.5%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.6% +10.4% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNPRYANYMM
Held by institutions 71.7% 45.6% 71.1%
Institutions holding 136 369 247
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +5.0% +3.0%
Institutions buying 105 198 168
Institutions selling 24 134 58
Buyers to sellers 4.38 1.48 2.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NPRYANYMM
NP 1.00 0.21 0.09
RYAN 0.21 1.00 0.06
YMM 0.09 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NP, RYAN and YMM?

Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) $4.05B, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) $10.83B, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $8.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, NP, RYAN and YMM?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 90.5x, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 53.6x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 14.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is cheapest (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 50.8x, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 18.3x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +33.8%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +14.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) has the highest net margin (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 22.7%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) leads (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 512.4%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) returned the most: Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +15.6%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) -20.8%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -36.8%. Over five years, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) compounded fastest (Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +2.6%/yr, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has the highest dividend yield: Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 0.00%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 1.20%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 2.85%. Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has been the steadiest (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 60.7%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 45.1%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NP, RYAN and YMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.