NNNN vs NEOG vs PHG Stock Comparison

Anbio Biotechnology, Neogen and Koninklijke Philips Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NNNN Anbio Biotechnology
$3.51 -36.8% 1M -79.2% 1Y
Market cap
$505.06M
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
NEOG Neogen Corp
$11.82 -2.7% 1M +91.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.58B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$883.99M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$27.58 +15.3% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$26.56B
P/E
14.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
3.59%
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
10 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 10, Neogen 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNNNNNEOGPHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $505.06M $2.58B $26.56B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.9x -46.0x 14.2x PHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 36.9x 13.9x PHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -0.3% +6.1% PHG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -6.3% 8.9% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.2% 11.5% PHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.4x 1.8x PHG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 3.59% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.2% +91.6% +1.0% NEOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -23.1%/yr -10.3%/yr PHG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 130.8% 55.7% 28.4% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 58/100 80/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

NNNNNEOGPHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNNNNNEOGPHG
Valuation 20 #182 of 227 72 #65 of 227 98 #6 of 227
Growth – 49 #112 of 220 96 #9 of 220
Profitability – 62 #80 of 209 96 #9 of 209
Financial Health 100 #1 of 240 48 #126 of 240 31 #167 of 240
Shareholder Returns – 58 #59 of 138 80 #29 of 138
Overall – 58 80
  • NNNN ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • NEOG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PHG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNNNNNEOGPHGSPY
1 month -36.8%-2.7%+15.3% -2.3%
3 months -67.0%-0.7%+5.1% -0.7%
6 months -88.3%+30.0%+5.1% +4.8%
Year to date -88.3%+69.1%+1.8% +10.3%
1 year -79.2%+91.6%+1.0% +10.3%
3 years —-25.3%+34.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year —-9.3%+10.3% +20.1%
5 years —-73.0%-42.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year —-23.1%-10.3% +10.1%
10 years —-39.4%-7.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year —-4.9%-0.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNNNNNEOGPHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 130.8%55.7%28.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 126.5%46.7%27.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.361.430.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.611.640.03 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.0%-90.6%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.5%-15.5%-16.2% -3.5%
52-week high $41.11$13.98$32.91 $779.14
52-week low $3.13$5.41$23.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNNNNNEOGPHG
P/E now vs peer median 23.9xmedian 28.4x -46.0xmedian 28.4x 14.2xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 58.4xmedian 3.0x 2.9xmedian 3.0x 1.3xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.0x 28.7xmedian 18.0x 8.3xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -74.9xmedian 25.0x 51.8xmedian 25.0x 6.1xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 2.3x 1.2xmedian 2.3x 2.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.93 1.64median 0.93 0.34median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNNNNNEOGPHG
Revenue – $883.99M $20.60B
Gross profit – $418.98M $16.03B
Operating income – -$7.38M $2.65B
Net income – -$56.10M $1.39B
Free cash flow – $49.80M $4.34B
R&D – $19.76M $2.00B
EPS (diluted) – $-0.26 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $7.77M $172.00M $2.04B
Total debt – $774.20M $9.51B
Shares (diluted) 43.67M 218.10M 962.50M
Enterprise value $458.28M $1.92B $15.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNNNNNEOGPHG
P/E 23.9x -46.0x 14.2x
P/FCF -74.9x 51.8x 6.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 30.3x 10.0x
P/S 58.4x 2.9x 1.3x
P/B 16.7x 1.2x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 16.7x 3.3x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA – 28.7x 8.3x
EV/EBIT – -431.4x 12.8x
EV/Revenue – 3.6x 1.6x
EV/FCF – 63.9x 7.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 37.3x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.64 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNNNNNEOGPHG
Revenue growth (1Y) – -0.3% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% 2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.8% 82.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.1% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 99.3% 121.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -29.0% 52.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 94.6% 293.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% 35.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 94.6% 539.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -28.0% 42.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.9% 116.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% 53.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,631% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 126.1% 45.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNNNNNEOGPHG
Gross margin – 47.4% 77.8%
EBITDA margin – 12.5% 19.8%
Operating margin – -0.8% 12.9%
Pretax margin – -7.7% 11.9%
Net margin – -6.3% 8.9%
FCF margin – 5.6% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% 12.9%
Return on equity – -2.7% 12.7%
Return on assets – -1.7% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – -0.2% 11.5%
Return on capital employed – -0.2% 11.8%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.5x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.3% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNNNNNEOGPHG
Debt / assets – 23.4% 31.2%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.4x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 15.5x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 0.3% 36.8% 57.1%
Equity / assets 99.7% 63.2% 42.9%
Interest coverage – – 6.2x
Current ratio 344.3x 3.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 177.1x 2.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio 135.5x 1.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.45 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNNNNNEOGPHG
Dividend yield – – 3.6%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% -0.5%
Shareholder yield – -0.1% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNNNNNEOGPHG
Forward P/E – 36.9xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.32FY2026 $1.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – 0.0%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +31.3% -10.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $847.28MFY2026 $21.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -2.7%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -1.5% -8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNNNNNEOGPHG
Held by institutions 0.0% 100.0% 5.4%
Institutions holding 12 315 365
Change in shares held, QoQ +39.8% +1.6% +0.8%
Institutions buying 8 151 268
Institutions selling 3 106 76
Buyers to sellers 2.67 1.42 3.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NNNNNEOGPHG
NNNN 1.00 -0.08 0.06
NEOG -0.08 1.00 0.31
PHG 0.06 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NNNN, NEOG and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) $505.06M, Neogen (NEOG) $2.58B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $26.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, NNNN, NEOG and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) 23.9x, Neogen (NEOG) -46.0x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 14.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is cheapest (Neogen (NEOG) 36.9x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Neogen (NEOG) -0.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Neogen (NEOG) -6.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%). On return on invested capital, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads (Neogen (NEOG) -0.2%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Neogen (NEOG) returned the most: Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) -79.2%, Neogen (NEOG) +91.6%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +1.0%. Over five years, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) compounded fastest (Neogen (NEOG) -23.1%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 3.59%. Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) and Neogen (NEOG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Anbio Biotechnology (NNNN) 130.8%, Neogen (NEOG) 55.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NNNN, NEOG and PHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.