NNDM vs VELO vs STKH Stock Comparison

Nano Dimension, Velo3D and Steakholder Foods Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DDD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.32 -18.0% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$278.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
6 wins
VELO Velo3D, Inc.
$5.64 -41.1% 1M +31.8% 1Y
Market cap
$181.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$57.56M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Nano Dimension leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Nano Dimension 6, Velo3D 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNNDMVELOSTKHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $278.31M $181.32M $52.09K NNDM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.7x -3.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +73.5% +31.5% — NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -349.5% -89.6% — VELO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -28.1% -46.2% — NNDM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.8x — VELO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.0% +31.8% -81.1% VELO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.6%/yr -75.5%/yr -83.5%/yr NNDM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.3% 165.4% 224.4% NNDM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 35/100 — NNDM

Percentile Scorecard

NNDMVELOSTKH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNNDMVELOSTKH
Valuation 39 #124 of 204 10 #184 of 204 –
Growth 57 #83 of 191 46 #104 of 191 –
Profitability 6 #177 of 189 5 #180 of 189 –
Financial Health 92 #19 of 221 78 #50 of 221 75 #56 of 221
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 49 35 –
  • NNDM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • VELO ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • STKH ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNNDMVELOSTKHSPY
1 month -18.0%-41.1%-36.4% -1.0%
3 months -15.4%-55.7%-83.7% -0.4%
6 months -30.5%-58.5%-75.9% +4.5%
Year to date -14.3%-59.0%-81.8% +12.4%
1 year -17.0%+31.8%-81.1% +13.6%
3 years -48.6%-99.2%-99.8% +76.4%
3 years, per year -19.9%-80.1%-88.1% +20.8%
5 years -77.2%-99.9%-100.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year -25.6%-75.5%-83.5% +10.4%
10 years -98.0%—— +267.7%
10 years, per year -32.4%—— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureNNDMVELOSTKHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.3%165.4%224.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.6%144.7%169.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.124.011.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.320.19-0.36 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.9%-100.0%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.3%-81.6%-90.2% -1.6%
52-week high $2.14$30.61$4.30 $779.14
52-week low $1.23$4.15$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNNDMVELOSTKH
P/E now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 25.5x -3.2xmedian 25.5x —median 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.9x 3.2xmedian 1.9x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 14.4x -2.1xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.4xmedian 23.3x -3.1xmedian 23.3x —median 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.2x 1.2xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.16 -0.04median 1.16 —median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNNDMVELOSTKH
Revenue $120.89M $57.56M –
Gross profit $46.88M $310.00K –
Operating income -$143.53M -$49.81M –
Net income -$139.91M -$51.59M –
Free cash flow -$51.44M -$58.67M –
R&D $29.99M $13.03M –
EPS (diluted) $-2.02 $-1.75 –
Cash & equivalents $349.11M $91.14M $1.06M
Total debt $3.43M $8.17M –
Shares (diluted) 209.34M 29.45M 124.02K
Enterprise value -$932.86M $60.92M -$6.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNNDMVELOSTKH
P/E -0.7x -3.2x –
P/FCF -5.4x -3.1x –
P/Operating cash flow -5.5x -3.4x –
P/S 2.3x 3.2x –
P/B 0.6x 1.2x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 1.2x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 0.5x -2.1x –
EV/EBIT 0.5x -2.0x –
EV/Revenue -0.6x 1.7x –
EV/FCF 1.3x -1.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 1.3x -1.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -0.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNNDMVELOSTKH
Revenue growth (1Y) 73.5% 31.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.6% -16.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 88.5% -88.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.7% -59.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.4% 19.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.0% 21.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -154.9% 36.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 23.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) -112.0% 69.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -428.7% 82.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.6% -200.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 22.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.4% -200.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 21.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNNDMVELOSTKH
Gross margin 38.8% 0.5% –
EBITDA margin -117.1% -81.1% –
Operating margin -118.7% -86.5% –
Pretax margin -121.7% -89.6% –
Net margin -349.5% -89.6% –
FCF margin -42.6% -101.9% –
Operating cash flow margin -41.9% -92.6% –
Return on equity -33.8% -52.1% –
Return on assets -28.9% -35.3% –
Return on invested capital -28.1% -46.2% –
Return on capital employed -27.7% -41.0% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.6% 16.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNNDMVELOSTKH
Debt / assets 0.6% 4.1% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF -0.1x -0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 13.5% 26.8% 27.9%
Equity / assets 86.5% 73.2% 72.1%
Interest coverage -341.7x -18.9x –
Current ratio 10.7x 6.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 8.0x 4.5x 1.2x
Cash ratio 7.5x 3.7x 1.2x
Altman Z-score – -1.33 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNNDMVELOSTKH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNNDMVELOSTKH
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.10FY2026 $-550.39FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $68.16MFY2026 $57.45MFY2025
Revenue growth, next FY – +48.3%FY2026 +574,390.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after – +26.5% -42.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNNDMVELOSTKH
Held by institutions 31.9% 41.1% –
Institutions holding 108 135 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.9% +84.8% –
Institutions buying 51 115 –
Institutions selling 25 15 –
Buyers to sellers 2.04 7.67 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NNDMVELOSTKH
NNDM 1.00 0.20 -0.02
VELO 0.20 1.00 0.02
STKH -0.02 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NNDM, VELO and STKH?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nano Dimension (NNDM) $278.31M, Velo3D (VELO) $181.32M, Steakholder Foods (STKH) $52.09K.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%, Velo3D (VELO) +31.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Velo3D (VELO) has the highest net margin (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%, Velo3D (VELO) -89.6%). On return on invested capital, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -28.1%, Velo3D (VELO) -46.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Velo3D (VELO) returned the most: Nano Dimension (NNDM) -17.0%, Velo3D (VELO) +31.8%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -81.1%. Over five years, Nano Dimension (NNDM) compounded fastest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -25.6%/yr, Velo3D (VELO) -75.5%/yr, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -83.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nano Dimension (NNDM) has been the steadiest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) 52.3%, Velo3D (VELO) 165.4%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) 224.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NNDM, VELO and STKH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.