NNDM vs LXFR vs DDD Stock Comparison

Nano Dimension, Luxfer Holdings and 3D Systems Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ATI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.25 -20.4% 1M -20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$247.79M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$125.92M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
1 win
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.31 +0.4% 1M +36.8% 1Y
Market cap
$463.21M
P/E
74.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
2.25%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
DDD 3D Systems Corp
$1.66 -53.9% 1M -36.2% 1Y
Market cap
$276.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$395.70M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Luxfer Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Luxfer Holdings 7, Nano Dimension 1, 3D Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNNDMLXFRDDDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $247.79M $463.21M $276.14M LXFR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.8x 74.7x -3.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +54.1% -11.8% +1.0% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -118.4% 1.7% -17.8% LXFR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -30.1% 5.2% -18.3% LXFR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.2x 0.6x DDD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.25% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.9% +36.8% -36.2% LXFR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.4%/yr -4.7%/yr -44.8%/yr LXFR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.6% 32.4% 95.9% LXFR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 51/100 28/100 LXFR

Percentile Scorecard

NNDMLXFRDDD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNNDMLXFRDDD
Valuation 39 #125 of 204 53 #96 of 204 25 #153 of 204
Growth 53 #91 of 191 18 #156 of 191 43 #110 of 191
Profitability 7 #175 of 189 37 #120 of 189 11 #168 of 189
Financial Health 89 #26 of 221 67 #73 of 221 61 #87 of 221
Shareholder Returns – 79 #35 of 159 3 #155 of 159
Overall 47 51 28
  • NNDM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • DDD ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNNDMLXFRDDDSPY
1 month -20.4%+0.4%-53.9% -5.9%
3 months -20.4%+1.3%-53.0% -4.6%
6 months -32.4%+11.5%-30.8% +0.2%
Year to date -18.8%+27.9%-6.2% +7.5%
1 year -20.9%+36.8%-36.2% +8.2%
3 years -50.6%+101.3%-60.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year -21.0%+26.3%-26.9% +19.0%
5 years -78.4%-21.4%-94.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year -26.4%-4.7%-44.8% +9.4%
10 years -98.1%—-86.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year -32.8%—-18.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureNNDMLXFRDDDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.6%32.4%95.9% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.2%37.9%98.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.130.803.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.401.14-0.38 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.9%-67.3%-96.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.6%-9.3%-57.2% -5.9%
52-week high $2.14$19.08$3.88 $779.14
52-week low $1.23$11.51$1.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNNDMLXFRDDD
P/E now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 23.4x 74.7xmedian 23.4x -3.8xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.7x 1.3xmedian 1.7x 0.7xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 13.4x 15.6xmedian 13.4x -5.9xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.7xmedian 21.9x 24.5xmedian 21.9x -6.5xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x 1.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.02 56.62median 1.02 -0.24median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNNDMLXFRDDD
Revenue $125.92M $355.20M $395.70M
Gross profit $53.18M $89.00M $136.36M
Operating income -$147.72M $22.40M -$64.44M
Net income -$149.06M $6.20M -$70.33M
Free cash flow -$67.80M $18.90M -$42.46M
R&D $26.37M $5.60M $41.64M
EPS (diluted) $-0.71 $0.23 $-0.43
Cash & equivalents $314.85M $19.90M $91.34M
Total debt $18.27M $57.70M $91.80M
Shares (diluted) 209.41M 27.30M 162.91M
Enterprise value -$978.39M $408.71M -$150.93M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNNDMLXFRDDD
P/E -1.8x 74.7x -3.8x
P/FCF -3.7x 24.5x -6.5x
P/Operating cash flow -3.7x 15.4x -8.6x
P/S 2.0x 1.3x 0.7x
P/B 0.6x 2.1x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 2.2x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 0.4x 15.6x -5.9x
EV/EBIT 0.3x 22.4x -3.9x
EV/Revenue -0.4x 1.4x 0.6x
EV/FCF 0.7x 26.5x -5.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 0.7x 16.7x -7.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 56.62 -0.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNNDMLXFRDDD
Revenue growth (1Y) 54.1% -11.8% 1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.6% -5.9% -7.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 105.5% -3.1% 2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 26.8% 2.9% -13.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.7% 0.0% 37.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -32.1% -4.2% 15.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -96.8% -56.6% -541.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.6% 1.7% 9.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.0% -56.9% -444.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -265.5% 1.3% 16.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -7.6% -31.4% 60.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.1% 0.7% 28.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.8% -47.6% 54.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 0.2% 28.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNNDMLXFRDDD
Gross margin 42.2% 25.1% 34.5%
EBITDA margin -104.5% 9.1% -10.6%
Operating margin -117.3% 6.3% -16.3%
Pretax margin -124.1% 5.2% -14.7%
Net margin -118.4% 1.7% -17.8%
FCF margin -53.8% 5.3% -10.7%
Operating cash flow margin -53.1% 8.4% -8.1%
Return on equity -32.6% 2.8% -27.1%
Return on assets -28.0% 1.6% -13.3%
Return on invested capital -30.1% 5.2% -18.3%
Return on capital employed -31.4% 7.3% -15.8%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 4.8x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 5.8% 1.1% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNNDMLXFRDDD
Debt / assets 3.6% 15.1% 17.5%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.3x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.2x 0.6x
Debt / FCF -0.3x 3.1x -2.2x
Liabilities / assets 14.8% 42.1% 53.1%
Equity / assets 85.2% 57.9% 46.9%
Interest coverage -1,078x 6.6x –
Current ratio 7.5x 2.5x 2.9x
Quick ratio 5.5x 1.1x 1.7x
Cash ratio 5.1x 0.3x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 3.57 -2.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNNDMLXFRDDD
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 0.6% -19.3%
Shareholder yield – 2.8% -19.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNNDMLXFRDDD
Forward P/E – 17.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.99FY2026 $-0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -10.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +41.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $386.72MFY2026 $368.77MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.2%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.6% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNNDMLXFRDDD
Held by institutions 31.9% 91.6% 71.1%
Institutions holding 108 138 210
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.9% -1.6% +34.8%
Institutions buying 51 76 126
Institutions selling 25 42 37
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.81 3.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NNDMLXFRDDD
NNDM 1.00 0.23 0.31
LXFR 0.23 1.00 0.20
DDD 0.31 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NNDM, LXFR and DDD?

Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nano Dimension (NNDM) $247.79M, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $463.21M, 3D Systems (DDD) $276.14M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nano Dimension (NNDM) +54.1%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%, 3D Systems (DDD) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has the highest net margin (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -118.4%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%, 3D Systems (DDD) -17.8%). On return on invested capital, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) leads (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -30.1%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%, 3D Systems (DDD) -18.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) returned the most: Nano Dimension (NNDM) -20.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +36.8%, 3D Systems (DDD) -36.2%. Over five years, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) compounded fastest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) -26.4%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -4.7%/yr, 3D Systems (DDD) -44.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 2.25%. Nano Dimension (NNDM) and 3D Systems (DDD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has been the steadiest (Nano Dimension (NNDM) 52.6%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 32.4%, 3D Systems (DDD) 95.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NNDM, LXFR and DDD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.