NICE vs RNG vs BAND Stock Comparison

Nice, RingCentral and Bandwidth Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OOMA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NICE NICE Ltd.
$112.39 -1.3% 1M -17.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.79B
P/E
5.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.91B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$77.77 -0.6% 1M +158.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.57B
P/E
9.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
0.35%
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$42.97 -32.6% 1M +166.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.32B
P/E
347.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.37M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Nice leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Nice 5, RingCentral 4, Bandwidth 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNICERNGBANDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.79B $6.57B $1.32B NICE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.6x 9.8x 347.8x NICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.3x 14.7x 25.1x NICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +5.5% +15.1% NICE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.2% 25.3% 0.5% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.1% -1.6% RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.5x 2.4x RNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.35% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.8% +158.2% +166.1% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.8%/yr -20.2%/yr -13.2%/yr BAND
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.4% 68.0% 96.8% NICE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 62/100 45/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

NICERNGBAND

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNICERNGBAND
Valuation 100 #1 of 28 78 #7 of 28 52 #14 of 28
Growth 64 #10 of 26 76 #7 of 26 60 #11 of 26
Profitability 79 #6 of 25 75 #7 of 25 29 #18 of 25
Financial Health 33 #21 of 31 20 #25 of 31 47 #17 of 31
Shareholder Returns 0 #17 of 17 63 #7 of 17 38 #11 of 17
Overall 55 62 45
  • NICE ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • BAND ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNICERNGBANDSPY
1 month -1.3%-0.6%-32.6% -2.3%
3 months +11.7%+35.8%-1.2% -0.7%
6 months -9.5%+64.6%-4.6% +4.8%
Year to date -0.6%+169.3%+178.1% +10.3%
1 year -17.8%+158.2%+166.1% +10.3%
3 years -33.1%+174.6%+236.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year -12.6%+40.1%+49.8% +20.1%
5 years -60.1%-67.7%-50.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year -16.8%-20.2%-13.2% +10.1%
10 years +74.0%+289.8%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +5.7%+14.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureNICERNGBANDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.4%68.0%96.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.4%56.3%93.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.241.172.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.322.331.71 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.6%-92.4%-89.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.1%-9.9%-45.2% -3.5%
52-week high $135.54$86.35$78.44 $779.14
52-week low $83.15$24.82$12.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNICERNGBAND
P/E now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 33.0x 9.8xmedian 33.0x 347.8xmedian 33.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.4x 2.5xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 11.9x 12.8xmedian 11.9x 25.6xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 14.5x 9.8xmedian 14.5x 13.7xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.9x -530.3xmedian 2.9x 3.5xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.72 0.18median 0.72 -8.10median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNICERNGBAND
Revenue $5.91B $2.62B $870.37M
Gross profit $3.89B $1.89B $319.33M
Operating income $1.14B $196.64M -$11.31M
Net income $955.10M $662.40M $8.75M
Free cash flow $1.08B $667.24M $96.37M
R&D $745.97M $330.14M $149.43M
EPS (diluted) $19.75 $7.55 $0.12
Cash & equivalents $315.38M $110.12M $171.32M
Total debt – $1.01B $310.58M
Shares (diluted) 63.32M 87.69M 33.49M
Enterprise value $5.26B $6.10B $811.71M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNICERNGBAND
P/E 5.6x 9.8x 347.8x
P/FCF 6.3x 9.8x 13.7x
P/Operating cash flow 5.0x 9.4x 11.6x
P/S 1.2x 2.5x 1.5x
P/B – -530.3x 3.5x
P/Tangible book – -116.4x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA 4.2x 12.8x 25.6x
EV/EBIT 5.7x 38.0x -129.0x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.8x 1.7x
EV/FCF 6.0x 11.2x 15.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x 10.7x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 0.18 -8.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNICERNGBAND
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 5.5% 15.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 50.0% 6.7% 13.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.5% 7.0% 8.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.5% 8.0% 10.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.2% 109.8% 13.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.1% 35.4% 29.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 5.6% 4,905% 175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 56.6% 53.9% -32.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.0% 5,149% 130.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.2% 55.7% -42.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.4% 16.3% 30.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.1% 29.1% 55.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -16.3% 16.5% 44.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.2% 30.7% 262.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNICERNGBAND
Gross margin 65.8% 72.2% 36.7%
EBITDA margin 26.2% 22.2% 6.5%
Operating margin 19.2% 7.5% -1.3%
Pretax margin 21.3% 5.0% 0.1%
Net margin 21.2% 25.3% 0.5%
FCF margin 18.3% 25.5% 11.1%
Operating cash flow margin 23.1% 26.7% 13.1%
Return on equity – – 2.3%
Return on assets 18.9% 40.7% 0.8%
Return on invested capital – 26.1% -1.6%
Return on capital employed 28.8% 20.7% -1.2%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.1x 13.0x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 9.2% 6.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNICERNGBAND
Debt / assets – 53.9% 28.4%
Debt / equity – -81.6x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.5x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets – 100.7% 65.1%
Equity / assets – -0.7% 34.9%
Interest coverage – 3.1x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.1x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 1.1x
Altman Z-score – 3.04 1.95

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNICERNGBAND
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield -20.5% 4.9% 2.3%
Shareholder yield -20.5% 5.3% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNICERNGBAND
Forward P/E 10.3xFY2026 14.7xFY2026 25.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.91FY2026 $5.28FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -11.3%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +19.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.1% +0.6% +15.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.32BFY2026 $2.76BFY2026 $938.18MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +24.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.0% -3.9% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNICERNGBAND
Held by institutions 56.3% 100.0% 92.9%
Institutions holding 322 379 241
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.0% +2.0% +27.1%
Institutions buying 147 212 171
Institutions selling 131 121 52
Buyers to sellers 1.12 1.75 3.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NICERNGBAND
NICE 1.00 0.54 0.20
RNG 0.54 1.00 0.30
BAND 0.20 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NICE, RNG and BAND?

Nice (NICE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Nice (NICE) $6.79B, RingCentral (RNG) $6.57B, Bandwidth (BAND) $1.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, NICE, RNG and BAND?

Nice (NICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Nice (NICE) 5.6x, RingCentral (RNG) 9.8x, Bandwidth (BAND) 347.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nice (NICE) is cheapest (Nice (NICE) 10.3x, RingCentral (RNG) 14.7x, Bandwidth (BAND) 25.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nice (NICE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Nice (NICE) +22.9%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Bandwidth (BAND) +15.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Nice (NICE) 21.2%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Bandwidth (BAND) 0.5%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%, Bandwidth (BAND) -1.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Nice (NICE) -17.8%, RingCentral (RNG) +158.2%, Bandwidth (BAND) +166.1%. Over five years, Bandwidth (BAND) compounded fastest (Nice (NICE) -16.8%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -20.2%/yr, Bandwidth (BAND) -13.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Nice (NICE) 0.00%, RingCentral (RNG) 0.35%. Nice (NICE) and Bandwidth (BAND) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nice (NICE) has been the steadiest (Nice (NICE) 55.4%, RingCentral (RNG) 68.0%, Bandwidth (BAND) 96.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NICE, RNG and BAND?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nice (NICE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.