NGTF vs ROK vs TER Stock Comparison

NightFood Holdings, Rockwell Automation and Teradyne Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MOB) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$439.20 +1.1% 1M +21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$49.38B
P/E
41.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
TER Teradyne, Inc
$323.68 -18.8% 1M +119.4% 1Y
Market cap
$48.98B
P/E
42.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.46B
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Teradyne leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Teradyne 4, NightFood Holdings 4, Rockwell Automation 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionNGTFROKTERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $896.03M $49.38B $48.98B ROK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.6x 41.1x 42.6x ROK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 35.1x 33.5x TER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,462.5% +11.3% +57.9% NGTF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,039.0% 13.4% 25.8% TER
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.0% 35.3% TER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 1.3x — NGTF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3,200.0% +21.5% +119.4% NGTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +75.3%/yr +6.6%/yr +18.8%/yr NGTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 527.7% 31.3% 78.6% ROK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 53/100 66/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

NGTFROKTER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisNGTFROKTER
Valuation 58 #6 of 13 16 #170 of 203 23 #87 of 112
Growth 0 #12 of 12 50 #94 of 188 90 #12 of 109
Profitability 46 #7 of 12 96 #9 of 183 94 #7 of 104
Financial Health 17 #11 of 13 32 #147 of 217 71 #34 of 116
Shareholder Returns – 72 #44 of 153 50 #41 of 81
Overall 30 53 66
  • NGTF ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • ROK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TER ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodNGTFROKTERSPY
1 month +10,900.0%+1.1%-18.8% -0.2%
3 months +10,900.0%-6.8%+0.9% +3.9%
6 months +10,900.0%+9.4%-14.9% +8.2%
Year to date +6,500.0%+12.9%+67.2% +12.9%
1 year +3,200.0%+21.5%+119.4% +12.3%
3 years +16,400.0%+67.6%+286.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +449.1%+18.8%+56.9% +23.3%
5 years +1,550.0%+37.8%+136.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +75.3%+6.6%+18.8% +10.9%
10 years +1,550.0%+271.5%+1,318.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +32.4%+14.0%+30.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureNGTFROKTERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 527.7%31.3%78.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 443.4%31.8%85.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.811.403.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 6.060.691.52 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.5%-45.6%-59.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-11.3%-33.1% -1.2%
52-week high $3.30$495.08$483.84 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$348.51$144.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleNGTFROKTER
P/E now vs peer median -10.6x 40.6xmedian 25.2x 44.0xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 110.0xmedian 18.7x 5.4xmedian 1.9x 11.3xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.6x 24.6xmedian 14.0x 33.6xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -104.6xmedian 14.5x 32.4xmedian 21.7x 65.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 76.0xmedian 1.1x 14.0xmedian 2.3x 14.6xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.16 -9.25median 1.32 1.52median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsNGTFROKTER
Revenue $8.15M $8.97B $4.46B
Gross profit $5.34M $4.41B $2.64B
Operating income -$77.62M $1.77B $1.35B
Net income -$84.65M $1.20B $1.15B
Free cash flow -$8.56M $1.50B $769.75M
R&D – $716.00M $559.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $10.76 $7.29
Cash & equivalents $865.89K $479.00M $349.54M
Total debt $136.49M $13.81B –
Shares (diluted) 271.53M 111.60M 157.69M
Enterprise value $892.75M $47.56B $47.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricNGTFROKTER
P/E -10.6x 40.6x 44.0x
P/FCF -104.6x 32.4x 65.8x
P/Operating cash flow -111.3x 28.2x 47.5x
P/S 110.0x 5.4x 11.3x
P/B 76.0x 14.0x 14.6x
P/Tangible book 153.7x 17.5x 15.0x
EV/EBITDA -12.6x 24.6x 33.6x
EV/EBIT -11.9x 29.1x 37.2x
EV/Revenue 113.5x 5.7x 11.3x
EV/FCF -107.9x 34.3x 65.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -114.8x 29.8x 47.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.16 -9.25 1.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricNGTFROKTER
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,463% 11.3% 57.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 293.8% 1.3% 16.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.9% 58.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 16.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,607% -7.1% 160.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -234.8% 2.9% 28.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,032% 23.8% 145.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -140.7% -5.5% 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -398.7% 25.2% 149.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -65.0% -4.4% 29.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -786.1% 13.8% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -88.4% 22.8% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -808.6% 13.9% 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -92.3% 23.6% 18.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricNGTFROKTER
Gross margin 65.5% 49.1% 59.2%
EBITDA margin -901.7% 23.3% 33.5%
Operating margin -952.6% 19.7% 30.2%
Pretax margin -1,039% 14.7% 30.2%
Net margin -1,039% 13.4% 25.8%
FCF margin -105.1% 16.8% 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin -98.8% 19.3% 23.9%
Return on equity -179.3% 30.9% 35.2%
Return on assets -87.5% 9.8% 24.9%
Return on invested capital – 21.0% 35.3%
Return on capital employed -119.7% 23.6% 37.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 24.6% 1.0% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricNGTFROKTER
Debt / assets 45.3% 29.4% –
Debt / equity 2.5x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 1.3x –
Debt / FCF -3.4x 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 81.7% 68.5% 29.5%
Equity / assets 18.3% 31.5% 70.5%
Interest coverage -12.3x 12.8x 118.8x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.1x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.94 5.96 23.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricNGTFROKTER
Dividend yield – 1.3% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 1.4% 0.9%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.7% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusNGTFROKTER
Forward P/E – 35.1xFY2026 33.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $12.50FY2026 $9.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +18.7%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.3% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.50BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.9%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.4% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersNGTFROKTER
Held by institutions – 89.2% 97.3%
Institutions holding – 1,540 1,419
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.5% +5.2%
Institutions buying – 805 828
Institutions selling – 437 456
Buyers to sellers – 1.84 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

NGTFROKTER
NGTF 1.00 0.00 -0.01
ROK 0.00 1.00 0.51
TER -0.01 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, NGTF, ROK and TER?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) is the largest by market capitalisation: NightFood Holdings (NGTF) $896.03M, Rockwell Automation (ROK) $49.38B, Teradyne (TER) $48.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, NGTF, ROK and TER?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -10.6x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 41.1x, Teradyne (TER) 42.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teradyne (TER) is cheapest (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 35.1x, Teradyne (TER) 33.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NightFood Holdings (NGTF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +1,462.5%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Teradyne (TER) +57.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teradyne (TER) has the highest net margin (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -1,039.0%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Teradyne (TER) 25.8%). On return on invested capital, Teradyne (TER) leads (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%, Teradyne (TER) 35.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NightFood Holdings (NGTF) returned the most: NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +3,200.0%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +21.5%, Teradyne (TER) +119.4%. Over five years, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) compounded fastest (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +75.3%/yr, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +6.6%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +18.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rockwell Automation (ROK) has been the steadiest (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) 527.7%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Teradyne (TER) 78.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, NGTF, ROK and TER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teradyne (TER) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.