MVST vs QS vs AMPX Stock Comparison

Microvast Holdings, QuantumScape and Amprius Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EOSE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
QS QuantumScape Corp
$4.20 -8.5% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Energy Storage Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

QuantumScape leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (QuantumScape 3, Amprius Technologies 2, Microvast Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMVSTQSAMPXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $194.19M $2.49B $1.22B QS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.8x -6.5x -31.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -13.0% — +143.6% AMPX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.9% — -35.2% MVST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -16.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -88.5% -73.5% -26.9% AMPX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -40.7%/yr -32.0%/yr — QS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.6% 70.1% 99.7% QS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 50/100 51/100 MVST

Percentile Scorecard

MVSTQSAMPX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMVSTQSAMPX
Valuation 90 #7 of 62 41 #37 of 62 44 #35 of 62
Growth 72 #17 of 59 45 #33 of 59 43 #34 of 59
Profitability 65 #20 of 55 33 #37 of 55 46 #30 of 55
Financial Health 37 #46 of 72 86 #11 of 72 92 #7 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 46 #16 of 29 32 #20 of 29
Overall 66 50 51
  • MVST ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • QS ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • AMPX ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMVSTQSAMPXSPY
1 month -4.6%-8.5%-4.1% +0.7%
3 months -22.5%-19.7%-3.5% +3.7%
6 months -67.9%-42.4%-56.6% +7.1%
Year to date -77.9%-59.7%+15.8% +12.8%
1 year -88.5%-73.5%-26.9% +11.9%
3 years -51.2%-20.6%+228.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year -21.3%-7.4%+48.7% +22.8%
5 years -92.7%-85.5%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -40.7%-32.0%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureMVSTQSAMPXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.6%70.1%99.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 105.7%72.5%106.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.873.063.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.93-1.05-0.27 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.4%-91.4%-94.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -88.6%-77.2%-60.1% -1.2%
52-week high $5.45$18.44$22.91 $779.14
52-week low $0.49$3.89$7.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMVSTQSAMPX
P/E now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 26.6x -6.8xmedian 26.6x -34.1xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 12.2xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -63.8xmedian 18.9x -4.9xmedian 18.9x -33.9xmedian 18.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -7.8xmedian 30.1x -10.1xmedian 30.1x -22.8xmedian 30.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.9x 2.6xmedian 1.9x 10.6xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 0.97 -0.53median 0.97 -4.54median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMVSTQSAMPX
Revenue $367.56M – $109.23M
Gross profit $92.31M – $24.31M
Operating income -$37.82M -$418.18M -$41.15M
Net income $51.27M -$383.62M -$36.54M
Free cash flow -$30.52M -$258.79M -$58.44M
R&D $35.81M $327.75M $13.16M
EPS (diluted) $0.15 $-0.62 $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $127.83M $75.60M $74.52M
Total debt $208.38M – –
Shares (diluted) 348.95M 620.56M 143.47M
Enterprise value -$255.48M -$1.07B $918.88M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMVSTQSAMPX
P/E 4.2x -6.8x -34.1x
P/FCF -7.8x -10.1x -22.8x
P/Operating cash flow -138.3x -11.5x -25.3x
P/S 0.6x – 12.2x
P/B 0.4x 2.6x 10.6x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 2.6x 10.6x
EV/EBITDA -63.8x -4.9x -33.9x
EV/EBIT -8.4x -4.3x -30.6x
EV/Revenue 0.9x – 11.5x
EV/FCF -10.5x -6.9x -21.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -185.0x -7.9x -23.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 -0.53 -4.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMVSTQSAMPX
Revenue growth (1Y) -13.0% – 143.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.7% – 203.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -38.4% – 390.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 65.0% – 65.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -225.8% 14.8% -4.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.7% 3.7% -10.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 145.2% 14.7% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 34.0% 4.5% -8.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 142.0% 19.1% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 12.9% 7.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.8% 7.1% -55.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 62.0% 2.5% -37.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -220.9% 7.6% -75.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.3% 9.9% -33.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMVSTQSAMPX
Gross margin 25.1% – 22.3%
EBITDA margin -1.4% – -34.1%
Operating margin -10.3% – -37.7%
Pretax margin -3.1% – -37.7%
Net margin 13.9% – -35.2%
FCF margin -8.3% – -53.5%
Operating cash flow margin -0.5% – -48.4%
Return on equity 10.2% -37.5% -35.0%
Return on assets 5.3% -33.5% -29.4%
Return on invested capital -2.6% – –
Return on capital employed -6.0% -38.3% -33.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.6x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 7.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMVSTQSAMPX
Debt / assets 21.9% – –
Debt / equity 0.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -16.1x – –
Debt / FCF -6.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 43.0% 11.1% 15.8%
Equity / assets 57.0% 88.9% 84.2%
Interest coverage -14.8x -221.6x –
Current ratio 1.1x 16.1x 7.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x 15.8x 6.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 15.8x 4.1x
Altman Z-score -0.95 – 32.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMVSTQSAMPX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.5% -2.0%
Shareholder yield – -0.5% -2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMVSTQSAMPX
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.04FY2026 $-0.61FY2026 $-0.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -200.0%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $387.00MFY2026 $0.00FY2026 $150.37MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -9.5%FY2026 – +106.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.4% – +50.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMVSTQSAMPX
Held by institutions 21.5% 33.9% 67.4%
Institutions holding 158 452 260
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.2% -10.0% +14.9%
Institutions buying 83 259 174
Institutions selling 46 90 63
Buyers to sellers 1.80 2.88 2.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MVSTQSAMPX
MVST 1.00 0.43 0.36
QS 0.43 1.00 0.62
AMPX 0.36 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MVST, QS and AMPX?

QuantumScape (QS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microvast Holdings (MVST) $194.19M, QuantumScape (QS) $2.49B, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) $1.22B.

Which company is growing faster?

Amprius Technologies (AMPX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microvast Holdings (MVST) -13.0%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) +143.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microvast Holdings (MVST) has the highest net margin (Microvast Holdings (MVST) 13.9%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) -35.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amprius Technologies (AMPX) returned the most: Microvast Holdings (MVST) -88.5%, QuantumScape (QS) -73.5%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) -26.9%. Over five years, QuantumScape (QS) compounded fastest (Microvast Holdings (MVST) -40.7%/yr, QuantumScape (QS) -32.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, QuantumScape (QS) has been the steadiest (Microvast Holdings (MVST) 95.6%, QuantumScape (QS) 70.1%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) 99.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MVST, QS and AMPX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, QuantumScape (QS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.