MUFG vs SNEX vs UBS Stock Comparison

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial, StoneX and UBS Group AG Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNEX StoneX Group Inc.
$53.91 -18.1% 1M -12.0% 1Y
Market cap
$6.47B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$157.71B
Div. yield
–
Institutional Trading Financial Services
5 wins
UBS UBS Group AG
$48.49 +1.6% 1M +26.4% 1Y
Market cap
$162.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.13%
Money Center Banks Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 6, StoneX 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMUFGSNEXUBSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $254.56B $6.47B $162.03B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.2x 11.9x — SNEX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.5x 11.8x 12.7x SNEX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.0% +20.6% — SNEX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% 0.3% — MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% 6.6% — SNEX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.45% — 1.13% MUFG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +41.8% -12.0% +26.4% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.5%/yr +20.4%/yr +21.2%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.5% 60.3% 27.1% MUFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 53/100 — SNEX

Percentile Scorecard

MUFGSNEXUBS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMUFGSNEXUBS
Valuation 27 #263 of 359 97 #4 of 96 –
Growth 74 #88 of 340 93 #6 of 68 –
Profitability 63 #128 of 343 42 #41 of 70 –
Financial Health 4 #324 of 338 11 #88 of 99 21 #266 of 338
Shareholder Returns 11 #314 of 351 20 #33 of 41 8 #324 of 351
Overall 36 53 –
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • SNEX ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • UBS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMUFGSNEXUBSSPY
1 month -6.0%-18.1%+1.6% -2.3%
3 months -4.6%-29.2%-8.1% -0.7%
6 months +22.1%-49.1%+11.8% +4.8%
Year to date +35.2%-15.0%+4.7% +10.3%
1 year +41.8%-12.0%+26.4% +10.3%
3 years +144.0%+86.7%+98.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +34.7%+23.2%+25.6% +20.1%
5 years +278.3%+152.6%+160.8% +61.9%
5 years, per year +30.5%+20.4%+21.2% +10.1%
10 years +324.8%+424.4%+252.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year +15.6%+18.0%+13.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMUFGSNEXUBSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.5%60.3%27.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.6%74.3%28.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.931.281.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.58-0.200.98 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.6%-62.0%-34.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-61.2%-13.0% -3.5%
52-week high $24.14$139.01$55.73 $779.14
52-week low $14.88$52.83$36.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMUFGSNEXUBS
P/E now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 12.7x 11.9xmedian 29.1x —median 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 3.5x 0.0xmedian 2.5x —median 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x 12.1xmedian 13.6x —median 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x 1.7xmedian 16.8x —median 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.46 0.52median 0.52 —median 1.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMUFGSNEXUBS
Revenue $31.62B $157.71B –
Gross profit $29.85B $5.68B –
Operating income $18.02B $3.50B –
Net income $13.97B $526.90M –
Free cash flow – $3.78B –
EPS (diluted) $1.32 $4.23 –
Cash & equivalents – $2.19B $215.72B
Total debt $112.96B $39.34B $29.83B
Shares (diluted) 11.40B 124.48M 3.29B
Enterprise value -$77.67B -$1.05B -$767.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMUFGSNEXUBS
P/E 16.2x 11.9x –
P/FCF – 1.7x –
P/Operating cash flow – 1.7x –
P/S 8.0x 0.0x –
P/B 2.4x 2.3x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 2.3x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – 12.1x –
EV/EBIT 4.8x 12.5x –
EV/Revenue 2.7x 0.3x –
EV/FCF – 11.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 11.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 0.52 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMUFGSNEXUBS
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.0% 20.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 37.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.8% 47.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 27.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% 51.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% 35.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 62.6% 77.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.4% 30.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 104.8% 60.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.4% 22.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 266.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 217.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 282.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 188.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMUFGSNEXUBS
Gross margin 94.4% 3.6% –
EBITDA margin – 2.3% –
Operating margin 57.0% 2.2% –
Pretax margin 59.6% 0.4% –
Net margin 47.7% 0.3% –
FCF margin – 2.4% –
Operating cash flow margin – 2.4% –
Return on equity 11.7% 19.0% –
Return on assets 0.5% 1.0% –
Return on invested capital 3.7% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 2.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 7.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMUFGSNEXUBS
Debt / assets 4.2% 72.8% 1.7%
Debt / equity 1.0x 13.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.3x –
Debt / FCF – 10.4x –
Liabilities / assets 96.0% 94.7% 94.8%
Equity / assets 4.0% 5.3% 5.2%
Interest coverage 0.6x 1.9x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMUFGSNEXUBS
Dividend yield 1.4% – 1.1%
Net buyback yield – -0.3% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% -0.3% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMUFGSNEXUBS
Forward P/E 12.5xFY2026 11.8xFY2026 12.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $4.57FY2026 $3.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.6%FY2026 +74.4%FY2026 +38.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.6% +1.8% +14.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $44.38BFY2026 $5.64BFY2026 $52.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +36.5%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +10.8% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMUFGSNEXUBS
Held by institutions 3.0% 83.8% –
Institutions holding 576 470 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% +2.5% –
Institutions buying 325 277 –
Institutions selling 161 145 –
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.91 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MUFGSNEXUBS
MUFG 1.00 0.19 0.46
SNEX 0.19 1.00 0.29
UBS 0.46 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MUFG, SNEX and UBS?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $254.56B, StoneX (SNEX) $6.47B, UBS Group AG (UBS) $162.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, MUFG, SNEX and UBS?

StoneX (SNEX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.2x, StoneX (SNEX) 11.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, StoneX (SNEX) is cheapest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.5x, StoneX (SNEX) 11.8x, UBS Group AG (UBS) 12.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

StoneX (SNEX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, StoneX (SNEX) +20.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, StoneX (SNEX) 0.3%). On return on invested capital, StoneX (SNEX) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.7%, StoneX (SNEX) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +41.8%, StoneX (SNEX) -12.0%, UBS Group AG (UBS) +26.4%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +30.5%/yr, StoneX (SNEX) +20.4%/yr, UBS Group AG (UBS) +21.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest dividend yield: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 1.45%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 1.13%. StoneX (SNEX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has been the steadiest (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.5%, StoneX (SNEX) 60.3%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 27.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MUFG, SNEX and UBS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.