MTX vs ODC vs USLM Stock Comparison

Minerals Technologies, Oil-Dri Corp of America and United States Lime & Minerals Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CMP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTX Minerals Technologies Inc
$62.56 -6.6% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.15B
Div. yield
0.77%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
2 wins
ODC Oil-Dri Corp of America
$74.53 -15.9% 1M +32.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.04B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$493.84M
Div. yield
1.09%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

United States Lime & Minerals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (United States Lime & Minerals 5, Oil-Dri Corp of America 5, Minerals Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTXODCUSLMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.95B $1.04B $3.16B USLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -29.0x 18.2x 23.5x ODC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.4x 19.4x 22.8x MTX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% +1.7% +7.0% USLM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.1% 11.5% 35.7% USLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.9% 16.8% — ODC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 9.4x -0.4x — ODC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.77% 1.09% 0.22% ODC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.0% +32.3% -16.1% ODC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.6%/yr +33.9%/yr +35.1%/yr USLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.3% 38.5% 38.9% MTX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 64/100 73/100 USLM

Percentile Scorecard

MTXODCUSLM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTXODCUSLM
Valuation 80 #34 of 162 67 #54 of 162 49 #83 of 162
Growth 24 #112 of 147 46 #80 of 147 57 #64 of 147
Profitability 40 #74 of 122 70 #37 of 122 83 #22 of 122
Financial Health 16 #138 of 164 63 #61 of 164 96 #7 of 164
Shareholder Returns 82 #20 of 107 72 #31 of 107 80 #22 of 107
Overall 48 64 73
  • MTX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ODC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • USLM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTXODCUSLMSPY
1 month -6.6%-15.9%-1.1% -0.2%
3 months -16.9%-27.1%-3.2% +3.9%
6 months -14.1%-0.8%-15.1% +8.2%
Year to date +2.6%+52.3%-8.0% +12.9%
1 year +10.0%+32.3%-16.1% +12.3%
3 years +17.9%+165.9%+186.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +5.7%+38.6%+42.1% +23.3%
5 years -12.2%+329.7%+349.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.6%+33.9%+35.1% +10.9%
10 years -5.6%+347.5%+722.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year -0.6%+16.2%+23.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTXODCUSLMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.3%38.5%38.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.4%39.0%44.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.630.411.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.400.84-0.41 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.7%-39.5%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.5%-29.9%-21.0% -1.2%
52-week high $82.84$106.39$139.46 $779.14
52-week low $55.09$46.21$97.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTXODCUSLM
P/E now vs peer median -29.0xmedian 13.3x 18.2xmedian 13.3x 23.5xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 3.2x 2.1xmedian 3.2x 8.4xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 39.1xmedian 7.3x 11.0xmedian 7.3x 14.9xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 14.7x 22.6xmedian 14.7x 34.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.2x 3.5xmedian 2.2x 4.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.73median 0.31 0.78median 0.31 0.84median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTXODCUSLM
Revenue $2.15B $493.84M $376.92M
Gross profit $526.40M $137.51M $182.84M
Operating income -$28.70M $67.98M $158.71M
Net income -$62.60M $56.97M $134.42M
Free cash flow $120.30M $45.90M $91.81M
R&D $23.40M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.16 $3.17 $4.67
Cash & equivalents $342.20M $73.70M $402.64M
Total debt $958.90M $38.86M –
Shares (diluted) 31.10M 17.95M 28.78M
Enterprise value $650.92M $811.05M $1.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTXODCUSLM
P/E -29.0x 18.2x 23.5x
P/FCF 16.2x 22.6x 34.4x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 12.9x 19.4x
P/S 0.9x 2.1x 8.4x
P/B 1.2x 3.5x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 3.7x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 39.1x 11.0x 14.9x
EV/EBIT -89.2x 14.7x 17.4x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 2.0x 7.3x
EV/FCF 21.3x 21.8x 30.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x 12.5x 16.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.73 0.78 0.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTXODCUSLM
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% 1.7% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 6.1% 12.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.4% -3.9% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 10.0% 26.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -138.2% -0.3% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.1% 18.3% 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,198% 5.5% 7.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -37.8% 24.5% 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -3,351% -18.4% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -39.7% 23.4% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.9% -0.1% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 17.2% 25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 35.6% -3.6% -14.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 21.8% 21.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTXODCUSLM
Gross margin 24.5% 27.8% 48.5%
EBITDA margin 3.0% 18.5% 49.0%
Operating margin -1.3% 13.8% 42.1%
Pretax margin -3.8% 14.1% 45.7%
Net margin -3.1% 11.5% 35.7%
FCF margin 5.6% 9.3% 24.4%
Operating cash flow margin 10.7% 16.2% 43.1%
Return on equity -3.8% 19.5% 19.8%
Return on assets -1.8% 13.6% 18.4%
Return on invested capital -0.9% 16.8% –
Return on capital employed -1.1% 19.4% 22.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.7x 1.4x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTXODCUSLM
Debt / assets 27.4% 9.1% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 9.4x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 8.0x 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 54.9% 30.6% 6.9%
Equity / assets 45.1% 69.4% 93.1%
Interest coverage – 30.9x –
Current ratio 1.4x 3.1x 27.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 2.2x 25.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.1x 22.2x
Altman Z-score 2.25 7.87 40.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTXODCUSLM
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.1% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 1.2% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 2.3% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) -23.5% 18.2% 5.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 12.2% 22.6% 7.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.3% 23.6% 9.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 31.3% 11.8% 14.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTXODCUSLM
Forward P/E 10.4xFY2026 19.4xFY2027 22.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.03FY2026 $3.84FY2027 $4.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.2%FY2026 -2.0%FY2027 +3.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.5% – +25.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.33BFY2026 $534.84MFY2027 $426.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.3%FY2026 +8.3%FY2027 +14.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.8% – +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTXODCUSLM
Held by institutions 100.0% 38.7% 32.5%
Institutions holding 292 161 234
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% +1.5% +7.5%
Institutions buying 176 92 139
Institutions selling 69 44 66
Buyers to sellers 2.55 2.09 2.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTXODCUSLM
MTX 1.00 0.33 0.25
ODC 0.33 1.00 0.16
USLM 0.25 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTX, ODC and USLM?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Minerals Technologies (MTX) $1.95B, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) $1.04B, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) $3.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTX, ODC and USLM?

Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -29.0x, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 18.2x, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 23.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Minerals Technologies (MTX) is cheapest (Minerals Technologies (MTX) 10.4x, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 19.4x, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 22.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Minerals Technologies (MTX) +4.1%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) +1.7%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has the highest net margin (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -3.1%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 11.5%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 35.7%). On return on invested capital, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) leads (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -0.9%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 16.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) returned the most: Minerals Technologies (MTX) +10.0%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) +32.3%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) -16.1%. Over five years, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) compounded fastest (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -2.6%/yr, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) +33.9%/yr, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +35.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) has the highest dividend yield: Minerals Technologies (MTX) 0.77%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 1.09%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 0.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Minerals Technologies (MTX) has been the steadiest (Minerals Technologies (MTX) 25.3%, Oil-Dri Corp of America (ODC) 38.5%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 38.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTX, ODC and USLM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.