MTLS vs SSNC vs PATH Stock Comparison

Materialise, SS&C Technologies Holdings and UiPath Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTLS Materialise Nv
$8.65 +2.6% 1M +43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$511.52M
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$318.18M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
1 win
PATH UiPath, Inc.
$14.28 +14.5% 1M -13.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.29B
P/E
20.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

SS&C Technologies Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (SS&C Technologies Holdings 4, UiPath 4, Materialise 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTLSSSNCPATHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $511.52M $19.10B $7.29B SSNC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.2x 22.4x 20.2x PATH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.2x 11.9x 18.8x SSNC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% +8.7% +15.0% PATH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.8% — 21.0% PATH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.2% -3.1% -13.3% MTLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.1%/yr +1.9%/yr -22.5%/yr SSNC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 29.4% 64.5% SSNC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 52/100 77/100 PATH

Percentile Scorecard

MTLSSSNCPATH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTLSSSNCPATH
Valuation 86 #15 of 102 82 #19 of 102 78 #23 of 102
Growth 88 #13 of 98 31 #68 of 98 87 #14 of 98
Profitability 61 #38 of 95 63 #36 of 95 76 #24 of 95
Financial Health 81 #22 of 109 – 89 #13 of 109
Shareholder Returns 8 #59 of 64 32 #44 of 64 54 #30 of 64
Overall 65 52 77
  • MTLS ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • SSNC ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • PATH ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTLSSSNCPATHSPY
1 month +2.6%+4.3%+14.5% -0.8%
3 months +34.3%+9.3%+23.0% +3.5%
6 months +62.9%+19.5%+36.5% +7.0%
Year to date +55.9%-6.2%-12.9% +12.2%
1 year +43.2%-3.1%-13.3% +13.0%
3 years +62.3%+68.4%-4.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.5%+19.0%-1.5% +23.1%
5 years -60.9%+9.9%-72.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.1%+1.9%-22.5% +11.0%
10 years +13.8%+149.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +1.3%+9.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMTLSSSNCPATHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%29.4%64.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.3%30.7%66.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.100.471.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.03-0.11-0.21 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.7%-44.8%-83.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.1%-8.5%-26.0% -1.8%
52-week high $8.75$89.62$19.29 $779.14
52-week low $4.80$62.05$9.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTLSSSNCPATH
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 28.8x 22.9xmedian 28.8x 20.5xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.8x 2.9xmedian 2.8x 3.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 17.7x —median 17.7x 17.7xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.6xmedian 15.8x 10.4xmedian 15.8x 18.0xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x 3.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.85 1.77median 0.85 0.33median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTLSSSNCPATH
Revenue $318.18M $6.69B $1.72B
Gross profit $182.10M $3.22B $1.42B
Operating income $12.25M $1.59B $152.95M
Net income $15.39M $853.70M $361.92M
Free cash flow $16.15M – $362.96M
R&D $55.71M $530.10M $368.32M
EPS (diluted) $0.26 $3.52 $0.69
Cash & equivalents $152.75M $525.40M $607.41M
Total debt $53.39M – –
Shares (diluted) 59.07M 242.00M 523.01M
Enterprise value -$105.79M $19.10B $1.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTLSSSNCPATH
P/E 33.2x 22.9x 20.5x
P/FCF 31.6x 10.4x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 14.3x 10.3x 17.5x
P/S 1.6x 2.9x 3.8x
P/B 1.7x – 3.3x
P/Tangible book 1.9x – 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 10.5x – 17.7x
EV/EBIT 33.6x – 34.2x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 2.9x 3.0x
EV/FCF 25.5x – 14.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.5x 10.3x 14.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 1.77 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTLSSSNCPATH
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% 8.7% 15.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 7.2% 14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.4% 8.0% 14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.0% 7.7% 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 73.2% 11.7% 430.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.7% 10.7% 38.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 150.8% 0.1% 1,695%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 330.9% 11.2% 59.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 151.3% 4.4% 1,763%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 310.4% 13.0% 61.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 46.9% 17.1% 11.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 15.8% 27.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 340.6% – 17.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 53.8% – 29.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTLSSSNCPATH
Gross margin 57.2% – 82.6%
EBITDA margin 12.3% – 17.2%
Operating margin 3.9% – 8.9%
Pretax margin 4.9% – 12.3%
Net margin 4.8% – 21.0%
FCF margin 5.1% – 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin 11.3% 27.8% 21.7%
Return on equity 5.3% – 18.8%
Return on assets 3.2% 4.2% 12.5%
Return on invested capital 3.5% – –
Return on capital employed 3.3% – 7.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 2.2x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 4.0% 13.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTLSSSNCPATH
Debt / assets 11.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.5x – –
Debt / FCF 3.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 38.6% 66.8% 33.0%
Equity / assets 61.4% – 67.0%
Interest coverage 27.6x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 0.8x 2.4x
Quick ratio 2.1x – 2.1x
Cash ratio 1.5x – 1.6x
Altman Z-score 2.97 – 4.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTLSSSNCPATH
Dividend yield – 1.4% –
Net buyback yield -20.9% – 3.9%
Shareholder yield -20.9% 1.4% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTLSSSNCPATH
Forward P/E 43.2xFY2026 11.9xFY2026 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.20FY2026 $6.91FY2026 $0.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.3%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +45.0% +7.5% +14.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $302.24MFY2026 $7.18BFY2026 $1.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.8%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% -7.0% -3.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTLSSSNCPATH
Held by institutions 13.7% 84.8% 79.0%
Institutions holding 59 724 525
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.4% +1.7% +14.3%
Institutions buying 23 385 276
Institutions selling 22 259 169
Buyers to sellers 1.05 1.49 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTLSSSNCPATH
MTLS 1.00 0.15 0.19
SSNC 0.15 1.00 0.41
PATH 0.19 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTLS, SSNC and PATH?

SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Materialise (MTLS) $511.52M, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) $19.10B, UiPath (PATH) $7.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTLS, SSNC and PATH?

UiPath (PATH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Materialise (MTLS) 33.2x, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 22.4x, UiPath (PATH) 20.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) is cheapest (Materialise (MTLS) 43.2x, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 11.9x, UiPath (PATH) 18.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UiPath (PATH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Materialise (MTLS) +10.2%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) +8.7%, UiPath (PATH) +15.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

UiPath (PATH) has the highest net margin (Materialise (MTLS) 4.8%, UiPath (PATH) 21.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Materialise (MTLS) returned the most: Materialise (MTLS) +43.2%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) -3.1%, UiPath (PATH) -13.3%. Over five years, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) compounded fastest (Materialise (MTLS) -17.1%/yr, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) +1.9%/yr, UiPath (PATH) -22.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) has been the steadiest (Materialise (MTLS) 42.1%, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) 29.4%, UiPath (PATH) 64.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTLS, SSNC and PATH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.