MTB vs RF vs UBSI Stock Comparison

M&T Bank, Regions Financial and United Bankshares Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.35 +0.1% 1M +21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$31.97B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.71%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.29B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.88%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
UBSI United Bankshares Inc/Wv
$48.52 +3.5% 1M +32.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.61B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.28B
Div. yield
3.13%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Bankshares leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (United Bankshares 6, M&T Bank 3, Regions Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTBRFUBSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $31.97B $24.29B $6.61B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.2x 11.3x 13.0x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.8x 10.2x 12.2x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.4% +14.5% UBSI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 28.2% 40.2% UBSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.6% 16.0% UBSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.71% 3.88% 3.13% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.0% +17.6% +32.7% UBSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr +3.7%/yr +5.9%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 23.3% 20.5% UBSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 72/100 UBSI

Percentile Scorecard

MTBRFUBSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTBRFUBSI
Valuation 66 #123 of 360 24 #275 of 360 30 #252 of 360
Growth – 10 #173 of 191 62 #74 of 191
Profitability – 49 #87 of 168 85 #26 of 168
Financial Health – 49 #90 of 175 95 #9 of 175
Shareholder Returns 56 #151 of 341 64 #123 of 341 88 #43 of 341
Overall – 39 72
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UBSI ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTBRFUBSISPY
1 month +0.1%+3.2%+3.5% -0.2%
3 months -12.4%-8.8%-1.0% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%+0.6%+10.0% +8.2%
Year to date +9.9%+5.2%+26.4% +12.9%
1 year +21.0%+17.6%+32.7% +12.3%
3 years +103.2%+103.5%+75.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.7%+26.7%+20.7% +23.3%
5 years +49.5%+20.1%+33.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%+3.7%+5.9% +10.9%
10 years +81.5%+163.0%+30.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +6.1%+10.2%+2.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTBRFUBSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%23.3%20.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.5%25.6%20.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.660.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.751.59 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-44.9%-40.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.9%-12.0%-1.7% -1.2%
52-week high $254.11$32.40$49.37 $779.14
52-week low $180.90$24.07$34.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTBRFUBSI
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 13.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 5.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x 12.4xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.30median 1.34 5.19median 1.34 1.53median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTBRFUBSI
Revenue – $7.62B $1.28B
Net income – $2.23B $515.15M
Free cash flow – $1.67B $533.93M
EPS (diluted) $19.72 $2.51 $3.72
Total debt – $7.63B $532.62M
Shares (diluted) 146.76M 857.00M 138.42M
Enterprise value $31.97B $24.36B $6.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTBRFUBSI
P/E 11.2x 11.3x 13.0x
P/FCF 8.7x 14.6x 12.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.7x 11.9x
P/S 3.2x 3.2x 5.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA – 6.5x –
EV/EBIT – 6.7x 5.9x
EV/Revenue – 4.2x 5.5x
EV/FCF – 19.1x 13.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.0x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.30 5.19 1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTBRFUBSI
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.4% 14.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.5% 30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% 9.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.7% 15.6% 34.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 2.2% 8.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% 18.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% 7.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% 16.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% 7.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTBRFUBSI
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 37.4% 50.3%
Net margin – 28.2% 40.2%
FCF margin – 21.9% 41.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% 43.3%
Return on equity – 11.8% 9.4%
Return on assets – 1.4% 1.5%
Return on invested capital – 14.6% 16.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTBRFUBSI
Debt / assets – 4.7% 1.6%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x –
Debt / FCF – 4.6x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 87.2% 88.3% 83.7%
Equity / assets 12.8% 11.7% 16.3%
Interest coverage – 2.5x 2.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTBRFUBSI
Dividend yield 2.7% 3.9% 3.1%
Net buyback yield – 4.7% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 8.6% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTBRFUBSI
Forward P/E 10.8xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 12.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.48FY2026 $2.80FY2026 $3.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.5%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 +21.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.4% -4.3% +6.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.60BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $1.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.4%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +16.2% +6.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTBRFUBSI
Held by institutions 90.2% 84.8% 74.7%
Institutions holding 1,148 1,104 448
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +2.9% +2.9%
Institutions buying 524 558 224
Institutions selling 392 347 123
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.61 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTBRFUBSI
MTB 1.00 0.90 0.77
RF 0.90 1.00 0.78
UBSI 0.77 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTB, RF and UBSI?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: M&T Bank (MTB) $31.97B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.29B, United Bankshares (UBSI) $6.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTB, RF and UBSI?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (M&T Bank (MTB) 11.2x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, United Bankshares (UBSI) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x, United Bankshares (UBSI) 12.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Bankshares (UBSI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, United Bankshares (UBSI) +14.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Bankshares (UBSI) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 40.2%). On return on invested capital, United Bankshares (UBSI) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 16.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Bankshares (UBSI) returned the most: M&T Bank (MTB) +21.0%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%, United Bankshares (UBSI) +32.7%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (M&T Bank (MTB) +8.4%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, United Bankshares (UBSI) +5.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: M&T Bank (MTB) 2.71%, Regions Financial (RF) 3.88%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 3.13%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United Bankshares (UBSI) has been the steadiest (M&T Bank (MTB) 21.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, United Bankshares (UBSI) 20.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTB, RF and UBSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Bankshares (UBSI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.