MTB vs RF vs CFG Stock Comparison

M&T Bank, Regions Financial and Citizens Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.35 +0.1% 1M +21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$32.19B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.27B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 6, M&T Bank 4, Citizens Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTBRFCFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.19B $24.27B $27.63B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.1x 11.3x 13.9x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.8x 10.2x 12.0x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.4% +11.0% CFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 28.2% 22.7% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.6% 12.3% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x 2.4x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.03% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.0% +17.6% +25.8% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr +3.7%/yr +6.4%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 23.3% 25.2% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 37/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

MTBRFCFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTBRFCFG
Valuation 66 #123 of 360 24 #275 of 360 28 #260 of 360
Growth – 10 #173 of 191 36 #123 of 191
Profitability – 49 #87 of 168 38 #105 of 168
Financial Health – 49 #90 of 175 32 #119 of 175
Shareholder Returns 56 #151 of 341 64 #123 of 341 53 #161 of 341
Overall – 39 37
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTBRFCFGSPY
1 month +0.1%+3.2%-0.4% -0.2%
3 months -12.4%-8.8%-10.5% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%+0.6%+0.5% +8.2%
Year to date +9.9%+5.2%+11.8% +12.9%
1 year +21.0%+17.6%+25.8% +12.3%
3 years +103.2%+103.5%+185.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.7%+26.7%+41.9% +23.3%
5 years +49.5%+20.1%+36.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%+3.7%+6.4% +10.9%
10 years +81.5%+163.0%+143.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +6.1%+10.2%+9.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTBRFCFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%23.3%25.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.5%25.6%25.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.660.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.751.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-44.9%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.9%-12.0%-12.6% -1.2%
52-week high $254.11$32.40$74.73 $779.14
52-week low $180.90$24.07$49.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTBRFCFG
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 13.9xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x 11.7xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.30median 1.34 5.19median 1.34 12.61median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTBRFCFG
Revenue – $7.62B $8.73B
Net income – $2.23B $2.13B
Free cash flow – $1.67B $2.35B
EPS (diluted) $19.72 $2.51 $4.65
Total debt – $7.63B $16.35B
Shares (diluted) 146.76M 857.00M 426.68M
Enterprise value $32.19B $24.27B $27.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTBRFCFG
P/E 11.2x 11.3x 13.9x
P/FCF 8.7x 14.6x 11.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.7x 11.0x
P/S 3.2x 3.2x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 6.5x 6.5x
EV/EBIT – 6.7x 6.9x
EV/Revenue – 4.2x 5.0x
EV/FCF – 19.1x 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.0x 17.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.30 5.19 12.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTBRFCFG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.4% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% 0.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.5% 33.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% -2.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.7% 15.6% 39.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 2.2% 1.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% 94.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% -24.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% 103.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% -24.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTBRFCFG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% 78.0%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 37.4% 31.1%
Net margin – 28.2% 22.7%
FCF margin – 21.9% 27.0%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% 28.7%
Return on equity – 11.8% 8.1%
Return on assets – 1.4% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 14.6% 12.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTBRFCFG
Debt / assets – 4.7% 7.0%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x 6.9x
Liabilities / assets 87.2% 88.3% 88.8%
Equity / assets 12.8% 11.7% 11.2%
Interest coverage – 2.5x 1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTBRFCFG
Dividend yield 2.7% 3.9% 2.8%
Net buyback yield – 4.7% 2.7%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 8.6% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% 36.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% 33.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% 4.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% -2.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTBRFCFG
Forward P/E 10.8xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.48FY2026 $2.80FY2026 $5.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.5%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.4% -4.3% +27.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.60BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.4%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +16.2% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTBRFCFG
Held by institutions 90.2% 84.8% 96.7%
Institutions holding 1,148 1,104 1,097
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +2.9% +2.9%
Institutions buying 524 558 633
Institutions selling 392 347 314
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.61 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTBRFCFG
MTB 1.00 0.90 0.86
RF 0.90 1.00 0.88
CFG 0.86 0.88 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTB, RF and CFG?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: M&T Bank (MTB) $32.19B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.27B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTB, RF and CFG?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (M&T Bank (MTB) 11.1x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Citizens Financial (CFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 22.7%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: M&T Bank (MTB) +21.0%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +25.8%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (M&T Bank (MTB) +8.4%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: M&T Bank (MTB) 0.00%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%. M&T Bank (MTB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (M&T Bank (MTB) 21.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTB, RF and CFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.