MTB vs FITB vs RF Stock Comparison

M&T Bank, Fifth Third Bancorp and Regions Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EWBC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.35 +0.1% 1M +21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$32.19B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$53.58 +2.9% 1M +26.2% 1Y
Market cap
$48.84B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.16B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.27B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fifth Third Bancorp leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Fifth Third Bancorp 4, M&T Bank 3, Regions Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTBFITBRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.19B $48.84B $24.27B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.1x 18.4x 11.3x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.8x 17.0x 10.2x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +17.1% +4.4% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 26.2% 28.2% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.9% 14.6% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.0% +26.2% +17.6% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.4%/yr +4.0%/yr +3.7%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 24.9% 23.3% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 40/100 39/100 FITB

Percentile Scorecard

MTBFITBRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTBFITBRF
Valuation 66 #123 of 360 12 #318 of 360 24 #275 of 360
Growth – 23 #148 of 191 10 #173 of 191
Profitability – 46 #92 of 168 49 #87 of 168
Financial Health – 50 #88 of 175 49 #90 of 175
Shareholder Returns 56 #151 of 341 72 #98 of 341 64 #123 of 341
Overall – 40 39
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTBFITBRFSPY
1 month +0.1%+2.9%+3.2% -0.2%
3 months -12.4%-7.3%-8.8% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%+6.5%+0.6% +8.2%
Year to date +9.9%+14.5%+5.2% +12.9%
1 year +21.0%+26.2%+17.6% +12.3%
3 years +103.2%+134.1%+103.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.7%+32.8%+26.7% +23.3%
5 years +49.5%+21.8%+20.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +8.4%+4.0%+3.7% +10.9%
10 years +81.5%+145.6%+163.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +6.1%+9.4%+10.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTBFITBRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%24.9%23.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.5%24.7%25.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.700.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.991.050.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-54.6%-44.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.9%-9.7%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $254.11$59.36$32.40 $779.14
52-week low $180.90$41.12$24.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTBFITBRF
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.1x 18.4xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 4.8xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.30median 1.34 -2.90median 1.34 5.19median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTBFITBRF
Revenue – $10.16B $7.62B
Net income – $2.81B $2.23B
Free cash flow – – $1.67B
EPS (diluted) $19.72 $2.91 $2.51
Cash & equivalents – $4.37B –
Total debt – $22.27B $7.63B
Shares (diluted) 146.76M 916.00M 857.00M
Enterprise value $32.19B -$33.39B $24.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTBFITBRF
P/E 11.2x 18.4x 11.3x
P/FCF 8.7x – 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow – – 13.7x
P/S 3.2x 4.8x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.4x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.5x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.5x
EV/EBIT – 6.1x 6.7x
EV/Revenue – 4.6x 4.2x
EV/FCF – – 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.30 -2.90 5.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTBFITBRF
Revenue growth (1Y) – 17.1% 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.6% -0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 20.2% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 3.3% -1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.7% -10.3% 15.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.4% -6.3% 2.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -33.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -6.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTBFITBRF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 64.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 35.4% 37.4%
Net margin – 26.2% 28.2%
FCF margin – – 21.9%
Operating cash flow margin – – 23.3%
Return on equity – 10.0% 11.8%
Return on assets – 1.1% 1.4%
Return on invested capital – 12.9% 14.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTBFITBRF
Debt / assets – 7.4% 4.7%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.6x
Debt / FCF – – 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 87.2% 88.5% 88.3%
Equity / assets 12.8% 11.5% 11.7%
Interest coverage – 1.9x 2.5x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTBFITBRF
Dividend yield 2.7% 3.0% 3.9%
Net buyback yield – – 4.7%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 3.0% 8.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 55.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTBFITBRF
Forward P/E 10.8xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $20.48FY2026 $3.15FY2026 $2.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.5%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -0.4% +61.3% -4.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.60BFY2026 $12.18BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.4%FY2026 +34.7%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +23.3% +16.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTBFITBRF
Held by institutions 90.2% 90.8% 84.8%
Institutions holding 1,148 1,303 1,104
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +3.9% +2.9%
Institutions buying 524 691 558
Institutions selling 392 406 347
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.70 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTBFITBRF
MTB 1.00 0.86 0.90
FITB 0.86 1.00 0.88
RF 0.90 0.88 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTB, FITB and RF?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: M&T Bank (MTB) $32.19B, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $48.84B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, MTB, FITB and RF?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (M&T Bank (MTB) 11.1x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 18.4x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.0x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +17.1%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 26.2%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 12.9%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: M&T Bank (MTB) +21.0%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +26.2%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (M&T Bank (MTB) +8.4%/yr, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.0%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: M&T Bank (MTB) 0.00%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 0.00%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%. M&T Bank (MTB) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (M&T Bank (MTB) 21.3%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 24.9%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTB, FITB and RF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.