MTA vs OR vs LU Stock Comparison

Metalla Royalty & Streaming, OR Royalties and Lufax Holding Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
OR OR Royalties Inc.
$34.08 -4.8% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.34B
P/E
22.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$362.74M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
6 wins
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.49 +584.7% 1M +156.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

OR Royalties leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (OR Royalties 6, Lufax Holding 2, Metalla Royalty & Streaming 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMTAORLULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $707.70M $6.34B $6.80B LU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -409.8x 22.4x -15.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 154.2x 28.2x — OR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +69.5% +7.7% OR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 78.0% -34.1% OR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.0% — -1.1% MTA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.4x — MTA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.2% +7.5% +156.5% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.1%/yr +21.6%/yr -19.8%/yr OR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.0% 46.5% 235.4% OR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 67/100 33/100 OR

Percentile Scorecard

MTAORLU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMTAORLU
Valuation 15 #144 of 169 35 #111 of 169 41 #100 of 169
Growth 99 #2 of 160 96 #8 of 160 26 #118 of 160
Profitability 28 #108 of 149 100 #1 of 149 24 #114 of 149
Financial Health 96 #7 of 158 98 #4 of 158 40 #95 of 158
Shareholder Returns 17 #113 of 136 6 #128 of 136 –
Overall 51 67 33
  • MTA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • OR ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • LU ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMTAORLUSPY
1 month -23.4%-4.8%+584.7% -0.2%
3 months +4.3%+15.8%+447.7% +3.9%
6 months +16.5%-9.3%+346.8% +8.2%
Year to date -0.9%-3.7%+231.6% +12.9%
1 year +13.2%+7.5%+156.5% +12.3%
3 years +166.8%+176.0%+123.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +38.7%+40.3%+30.8% +23.3%
5 years -0.3%+165.4%-66.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -0.1%+21.6%-19.8% +10.9%
10 years +888.5%+225.8%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +25.8%+12.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMTAORLUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.0%46.5%235.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.5%50.3%59.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.231.640.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.240.160.66 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.6%-41.2%-97.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.1%-28.6%-0.1% -1.2%
52-week high $11.35$47.73$8.50 $779.14
52-week low $6.06$28.05$0.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMTAORLU
P/E now vs peer median -413.0xmedian 11.1x 22.6xmedian 11.1x -16.8xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 17.6xmedian 2.6x 5.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 154.6xmedian 13.5x 20.1xmedian 13.5x —median 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 132.2xmedian 7.0x 21.0xmedian 7.0x 9.8xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median -6.93median 0.32 0.36median 0.32 0.38median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMTAORLU
Revenue – $362.74M $1.29B
Gross profit $13.59M $307.80M –
Operating income $2.62M $279.97M –
Net income -$440.00K $283.06M -$381.02M
Free cash flow $5.42M $303.17M $747.06M
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 $1.50 $-0.51
Cash & equivalents $10.67M $75.61M –
Total debt $49.93M $384.77M $9.62B
Shares (diluted) 92.51M 189.15M 866.69M
Enterprise value $664.84M $5.97B $1.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMTAORLU
P/E -413.0x 22.6x -16.8x
P/FCF 132.2x 21.0x 9.8x
P/Operating cash flow 132.2x 21.0x 9.8x
P/S – 17.6x 5.7x
P/B 2.8x – 0.6x
P/Tangible book 2.8x – 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 154.6x 20.1x –
EV/EBIT 273.6x 23.3x -60.5x
EV/Revenue – 18.0x 12.3x
EV/FCF 132.4x 21.5x 21.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 132.4x 21.5x 21.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.93 0.36 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMTAORLU
Revenue growth (1Y) – 69.5% 7.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 27.3% -41.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 130.8% 76.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 114.8% 36.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 237.2% 91.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 44.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 90.7% 260.5% 18.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 70.8% 61.8% -47.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.4% 260.4% 31.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.6% 62.7% -43.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 280.4% 82.0% 19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 70.1% 31.3% -25.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 280.4% 82.0% 19.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 70.1% 31.3% -25.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMTAORLU
Gross margin – 84.9% –
EBITDA margin – 89.6% –
Operating margin – 77.2% –
Pretax margin – 91.1% -20.4%
Net margin – 78.0% -34.1%
FCF margin – 83.6% 58.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 83.6% 58.1%
Return on equity -0.7% – -3.3%
Return on assets -0.6% – -1.3%
Return on invested capital 1.0% – -1.1%
Return on capital employed 1.0% – –
Asset turnover – – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -12.3x 1.1x -2.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMTAORLU
Debt / assets 4.5% – 32.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 0.7x 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 6.3% – 59.8%
Equity / assets 93.7% – 40.2%
Interest coverage 1.9x 50.0x -707.1x
Current ratio 4.5x – –
Quick ratio 4.4x – –
Cash ratio 3.0x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMTAORLU
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% – –
Shareholder yield -0.1% 0.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMTAORLU
Forward P/E 154.2xFY2026 28.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.05FY2026 $1.21FY2026 $-3.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +37.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +240.0% +13.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.29MFY2026 $404.61MFY2026 $4.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +54.5%FY2026 +45.9%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +85.2% +6.8% -9.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMTAORLU
Held by institutions 31.2% 68.0% 8.1%
Institutions holding 94 244 75
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.5% -2.1% -12.0%
Institutions buying 41 116 31
Institutions selling 36 84 29
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.38 1.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MTAORLU
MTA 1.00 0.74 0.00
OR 0.74 1.00 -0.02
LU 0.00 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MTA, OR and LU?

Lufax Holding (LU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) $707.70M, OR Royalties (OR) $6.34B, Lufax Holding (LU) $6.80B.

Which company is growing faster?

OR Royalties (OR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: OR Royalties (OR) +69.5%, Lufax Holding (LU) +7.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

OR Royalties (OR) has the highest net margin (OR Royalties (OR) 78.0%, Lufax Holding (LU) -34.1%). On return on invested capital, Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) leads (Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) 1.0%, Lufax Holding (LU) -1.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) +13.2%, OR Royalties (OR) +7.5%, Lufax Holding (LU) +156.5%. Over five years, OR Royalties (OR) compounded fastest (Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) -0.1%/yr, OR Royalties (OR) +21.6%/yr, Lufax Holding (LU) -19.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, OR Royalties (OR) has been the steadiest (Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA) 55.0%, OR Royalties (OR) 46.5%, Lufax Holding (LU) 235.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MTA, OR and LU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, OR Royalties (OR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.