MSFT vs OTEX vs QXL Stock Comparison

Microsoft, Open Text and Quantum X Labs Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IBM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$535.93 +1.3% 1M +5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.98T
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.68%
Cloud Platforms Technology
6 wins
OTEX Open Text Corp
$26.12 +15.0% 1M -31.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.32B
P/E
10.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.25B
Div. yield
4.27%
Productivity Software Technology
3 wins
QXL Quantum X Labs Inc.
$3.71 -9.3% 1M +86.4% 1Y
Market cap
$53.02M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$2.80M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 6, Open Text 3, Quantum X Labs 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSFTOTEXQXLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.98T $6.32B $53.02M MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.9x 10.1x -25.7x OTEX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.9x 6.3x — OTEX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.9% +1.5% +75.6% QXL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 41.2% 12.3% — MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.5% 8.1% 7.1% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 2.8x -0.6x QXL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.68% 4.27% — OTEX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.7% -31.3% +86.4% QXL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.8%/yr -12.7%/yr -6.0%/yr MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.5% 38.6% 94.2% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 60/100 33/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

MSFTOTEXQXL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSFTOTEXQXL
Valuation 60 #16 of 38 89 #4 of 29 29 #119 of 166
Growth 69 #12 of 36 44 #16 of 28 14 #132 of 154
Profitability 97 #2 of 34 69 #9 of 27 44 #86 of 154
Financial Health 84 #7 of 38 13 #27 of 31 69 #57 of 179
Shareholder Returns 79 #5 of 20 86 #4 of 22 7 #90 of 97
Overall 78 60 33
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • OTEX ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • QXL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSFTOTEXQXLSPY
1 month +1.3%+15.0%-9.3% -5.9%
3 months +7.2%+1.8%-21.2% -4.6%
6 months +27.4%+10.3%+12.8% +0.2%
Year to date +10.8%-19.8%+142.5% +7.5%
1 year +5.7%-31.3%+86.4% +8.2%
3 years +50.3%-26.6%+81.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +14.6%-9.8%+22.1% +19.0%
5 years +59.5%-49.4%-26.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year +9.8%-12.7%-6.0% +9.4%
10 years +812.8%-14.0%-99.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year +24.8%-1.5%-39.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureMSFTOTEXQXLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.5%38.6%94.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.2%39.6%82.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.020.770.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.17-0.810.92 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.6%-61.7%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.6%-31.3%-45.8% -5.9%
52-week high $555.80$38.02$6.85 $779.14
52-week low $352.83$20.01$1.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSFTOTEXQXL
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 27.4x 10.1xmedian 34.8x -25.7xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 3.3x 1.2xmedian 2.1x -18.9xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 21.2x 6.5xmedian 11.9x 25.1xmedian 15.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.4xmedian 15.9x 7.8xmedian 13.6x -14.0xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 2.6x 1.6xmedian 3.1x 2.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.22median 1.22 0.15median 0.73 0.10median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSFTOTEXQXL
Revenue $346.45B $5.25B -$2.80M
Gross profit $234.39B $3.87B –
Operating income $163.19B $1.08B $1.76M
Net income $142.63B $643.26M -$2.74M
Free cash flow $59.96B $807.52M -$3.79M
R&D $36.46B $647.71M $2.00K
EPS (diluted) $19.16 $2.58 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $20.28B $956.02M $2.44M
Total debt $35.48B $5.77B $1.24M
Shares (diluted) 7.45B 249.37M 20.07M
Enterprise value $3.92T $1.76B $45.61M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXQXL
P/E 27.9x 10.1x -25.7x
P/FCF 66.4x 7.8x -14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 20.3x 6.3x -14.7x
P/S 11.5x 1.2x -18.9x
P/B 8.5x 1.6x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 2.5x -133.9x
EV/EBITDA 19.2x 6.5x 25.1x
EV/EBIT 24.2x 10.3x 29.4x
EV/Revenue 11.4x 2.1x -18.5x
EV/FCF 65.9x 13.8x -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.2x 11.1x -14.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.22 0.15 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXQXL
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.9% 1.5% 75.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 5.4% -26.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.0% 3.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% 6.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.0% 21.3% -61.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.2% 28.0% -2.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.0% 47.5% 86.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 62.3% -76.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.3% 56.0% 96.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 66.8% -249.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.2% 21.2% -943.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.3% 8.9% -44.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -23.1% 17.5% -997.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.8% 7.2% -44.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXQXL
Gross margin 67.7% 73.7% –
EBITDA margin 59.3% 32.6% –
Operating margin 47.1% 20.6% –
Pretax margin 51.3% 16.4% –
Net margin 41.2% 12.3% –
FCF margin 17.3% 15.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 56.5% 19.2% 128.6%
Return on equity 31.2% 16.1% -11.7%
Return on assets 18.6% 4.9% -9.3%
Return on invested capital 26.5% 8.1% 7.1%
Return on capital employed 26.5% 10.2% 6.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x -0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXQXL
Debt / assets 4.6% 44.0% 4.0%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 2.8x -0.6x
Debt / FCF 0.6x 7.1x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 39.6% 69.4% 17.3%
Equity / assets 60.4% 30.6% 82.7%
Interest coverage 50.6x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 9.56 1.26 4.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSFTOTEXQXL
Dividend yield 0.7% 4.3% –
Net buyback yield 0.5% 6.5% -8.7%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 10.8% -8.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 45.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSFTOTEXQXL
Forward P/E 25.9xFY2027 6.3xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $20.69FY2027 $4.15FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +19.7%FY2027 -4.8%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.2% 0.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $406.13BFY2027 $5.06BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +22.4%FY2027 -2.4%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +13.6% +1.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSFTOTEXQXL
Held by institutions 73.9% 81.5% –
Institutions holding 6,238 272 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +6.5% –
Institutions buying 3,439 160 –
Institutions selling 2,429 82 –
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.95 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSFTOTEXQXL
MSFT 1.00 0.44 0.00
OTEX 0.44 1.00 -0.10
QXL 0.00 -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSFT, OTEX and QXL?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microsoft (MSFT) $3.98T, Open Text (OTEX) $6.32B, Quantum X Labs (QXL) $53.02M.

Which stock is cheaper, MSFT, OTEX and QXL?

Open Text (OTEX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Microsoft (MSFT) 27.9x, Open Text (OTEX) 10.1x, Quantum X Labs (QXL) -25.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Open Text (OTEX) is cheapest (Microsoft (MSFT) 25.9x, Open Text (OTEX) 6.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quantum X Labs (QXL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%, Open Text (OTEX) +1.5%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) +75.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%, Open Text (OTEX) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%, Open Text (OTEX) 8.1%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) 7.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quantum X Labs (QXL) returned the most: Microsoft (MSFT) +5.7%, Open Text (OTEX) -31.3%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) +86.4%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Microsoft (MSFT) +9.8%/yr, Open Text (OTEX) -12.7%/yr, Quantum X Labs (QXL) -6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Open Text (OTEX) has the highest dividend yield: Microsoft (MSFT) 0.68%, Open Text (OTEX) 4.27%. Quantum X Labs (QXL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Microsoft (MSFT) 33.5%, Open Text (OTEX) 38.6%, Quantum X Labs (QXL) 94.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSFT, OTEX and QXL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.