MSFT vs ORCL vs NBIS Stock Comparison

Microsoft, Oracle and Nebius Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CRWV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$524.51 +4.8% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.96T
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$331.84B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
6 wins
ORCL Oracle Corp
$126.08 -12.8% 1M -55.0% 1Y
Market cap
$373.36B
P/E
19.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.78B
Div. yield
0.02%
ERP Software Technology
3 wins
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.
$158.74 -30.0% 1M +49.5% 1Y
Market cap
$37.16B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.36B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 6, Oracle 3, Nebius 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSFTORCLNBISLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.96T $373.36B $37.16B MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.6x 19.8x 41.5x ORCL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.7x 14.7x — ORCL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% +21.6% +506.9% NBIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% 26.2% 66.1% NBIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.7% 11.0% -3.3% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 2.6x 3.0x MSFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% ORCL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.8% -55.0% +49.5% NBIS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.2%/yr +5.1%/yr — MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.7% 56.9% 107.4% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 54/100 65/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

MSFTORCLNBIS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSFTORCLNBIS
Valuation 54 #18 of 38 56 #45 of 101 78 #9 of 38
Growth 77 #9 of 36 65 #35 of 97 31 #25 of 36
Profitability 97 #2 of 34 87 #13 of 94 76 #9 of 34
Financial Health 84 #7 of 38 40 #66 of 109 76 #10 of 38
Shareholder Returns 81 #5 of 22 21 #51 of 64 –
Overall 79 54 65
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • ORCL ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • NBIS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSFTORCLNBISSPY
1 month +4.8%-12.8%-30.0% -1.0%
3 months +37.4%+9.6%-15.5% +2.9%
6 months +23.5%-27.2%+7.9% +6.4%
Year to date +8.5%-35.3%+89.6% +11.4%
1 year +0.8%-55.0%+49.5% +13.1%
3 years +58.7%+22.2%— +79.4%
3 years, per year +16.7%+6.9%— +21.5%
5 years +69.7%+28.3%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +11.2%+5.1%— +10.9%
10 years +779.2%+232.4%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +24.3%+12.8%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMSFTORCLNBISSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.7%56.9%107.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%56.7%98.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.002.223.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.970.46 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.6%-65.0%-58.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-55.5%-44.6% -2.5%
52-week high $543.45$283.33$286.69 $779.14
52-week low $352.83$115.01$73.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSFTORCLNBIS
P/E now vs peer median 29.1xmedian 29.1x 19.9xmedian 29.9x 43.0xmedian 29.1x
P/S now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 4.5x 5.3xmedian 2.8x 29.6xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 21.5x 13.8xmedian 17.4x 239.8xmedian 21.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 58.2xmedian 17.3x -13.3xmedian 16.9x 2.4xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 3.9x 5.7xmedian 3.1x 3.9xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.28median 0.33 0.84median 0.86 -0.61median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSFTORCLNBIS
Revenue $331.84B $71.78B $1.36B
Gross profit $225.47B – $1.01B
Operating income $155.24B $23.06B -$668.60M
Net income $133.75B $18.92B $61.60M
Free cash flow $66.99B -$28.72B $16.40B
R&D $35.56B $10.18B $356.40M
EPS (diluted) $17.95 $6.27 $3.17
Cash & equivalents $20.94B $36.37B $8.04B
Total debt $164.03B $497.56B $25.23B
Shares (diluted) 7.45B 3.00B 282.72M
Enterprise value $3.88T $245.49B $10.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSFTORCLNBIS
P/E 29.1x 19.9x 43.0x
P/FCF 58.2x -13.3x 2.4x
P/Operating cash flow 21.3x 8.1x 7.6x
P/S 11.7x 5.3x 29.6x
P/B 8.8x 5.7x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 9.2x 5.7x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x 13.8x 239.8x
EV/EBIT 24.9x 20.4x -60.8x
EV/Revenue 11.6x 6.5x 30.0x
EV/FCF 57.6x -16.3x 2.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.1x 10.0x 7.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.28 0.84 -0.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSFTORCLNBIS
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% 21.6% 506.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 12.1% -83.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.3% – 631.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% – -81.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.8% 28.3% -49.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 18.8% -26.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.3% 52.1% -73.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.7% 26.4% -90.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.6% 46.7% 318.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 23.6% -70.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.4% 118.0% 1,193%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 38.3% -55.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.5% -388.4% 1,310%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% -71.4% -47.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSFTORCLNBIS
Gross margin 67.9% – 74.3%
EBITDA margin 59.9% 47.3% 12.5%
Operating margin 46.8% 32.1% -49.3%
Pretax margin 50.0% 30.3% 5.3%
Net margin 40.3% 26.2% 66.1%
FCF margin 20.2% -40.0% 1,210%
Operating cash flow margin 55.1% 65.4% 388.0%
Return on equity 31.2% 34.3% 0.7%
Return on assets 18.4% 6.7% 0.2%
Return on invested capital 26.7% 11.0% -3.3%
Return on capital employed 27.8% 9.8% -2.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.5x 85.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.7% 6.7% 13.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSFTORCLNBIS
Debt / assets 5.3% 41.3% 30.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.9x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 2.6x 3.0x
Debt / FCF 0.6x -4.4x 0.5x
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 77.8% 63.0%
Equity / assets 58.3% 22.2% 37.0%
Interest coverage 50.9x 4.5x -2.8x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x 4.0x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.0x 3.5x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.8x 3.4x
Altman Z-score 9.18 1.48 1.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSFTORCLNBIS
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.6% –
Net buyback yield 0.5% -5.3% 7,080%
Shareholder yield 1.2% -3.7% 7,080%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.8% 31.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 39.5% -20.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.8% 17.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 15.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSFTORCLNBIS
Forward P/E 25.7xFY2027 14.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $20.38FY2027 $8.57FY2026 $-1.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.9%FY2027 +12.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +11.5% +23.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $402.02BFY2027 $95.06BFY2026 $3.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.1%FY2027 +41.1%FY2026 +512.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.7% +45.6% +248.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSFTORCLNBIS
Held by institutions 73.9% 44.7% 66.4%
Institutions holding 6,227 3,495 1,052
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +6.5% +29.6%
Institutions buying 3,432 1,807 694
Institutions selling 2,425 1,308 274
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.38 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSFTORCLNBIS
MSFT 1.00 0.47 0.19
ORCL 0.47 1.00 0.55
NBIS 0.19 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MSFT, ORCL and NBIS?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Microsoft (MSFT) $3.96T, Oracle (ORCL) $373.36B, Nebius (NBIS) $37.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, MSFT, ORCL and NBIS?

Oracle (ORCL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Microsoft (MSFT) 29.6x, Oracle (ORCL) 19.8x, Nebius (NBIS) 41.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Oracle (ORCL) is cheapest (Microsoft (MSFT) 25.7x, Oracle (ORCL) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nebius (NBIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Microsoft (MSFT) +17.8%, Oracle (ORCL) +21.6%, Nebius (NBIS) +506.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nebius (NBIS) has the highest net margin (Microsoft (MSFT) 40.3%, Oracle (ORCL) 26.2%, Nebius (NBIS) 66.1%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Microsoft (MSFT) 26.7%, Oracle (ORCL) 11.0%, Nebius (NBIS) -3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nebius (NBIS) returned the most: Microsoft (MSFT) +0.8%, Oracle (ORCL) -55.0%, Nebius (NBIS) +49.5%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Microsoft (MSFT) +11.2%/yr, Oracle (ORCL) +5.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Oracle (ORCL) has the highest dividend yield: Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%, Oracle (ORCL) 0.02%, Nebius (NBIS) 0.00%. Nebius (NBIS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Microsoft (MSFT) 32.7%, Oracle (ORCL) 56.9%, Nebius (NBIS) 107.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MSFT, ORCL and NBIS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.