MS vs USB vs GS Stock Comparison

Morgan Stanley, Us Bancorp and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JPM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MS Morgan Stanley
$190.30 -1.7% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$299.14B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$80.16B
Div. yield
2.18%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins
USB Us Bancorp De
$59.62 +1.4% 1M +26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$92.89B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
3.52%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$926.20 +1.1% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$269.93B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.94%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Us Bancorp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Us Bancorp 5, Morgan Stanley 2, Goldman Sachs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMSUSBGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $299.14B $92.89B $269.93B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.9x 11.9x 13.0x USB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x 11.5x 12.3x USB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.2% +6.7% +18.7% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 26.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.18% 3.52% 1.94% USB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.2% +26.1% +16.9% USB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.1%/yr -0.2%/yr +17.5%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.5% 22.1% 31.9% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 47/100 47/100 MS

Percentile Scorecard

MSUSBGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMSUSBGS
Valuation 28 #260 of 361 40 #218 of 361 16 #302 of 361
Growth 93 #13 of 172 47 #91 of 172 97 #6 of 172
Profitability – 78 #34 of 149 –
Financial Health – 13 #137 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 33 #226 of 338 54 #155 of 338 28 #243 of 338
Overall 51 47 47
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • USB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMSUSBGSSPY
1 month -1.7%+1.4%+1.1% +0.9%
3 months -6.3%-5.1%-5.6% +5.9%
6 months +1.7%+6.1%+2.3% +8.5%
Year to date +7.2%+11.7%+5.4% +13.3%
1 year +15.2%+26.1%+16.9% +12.4%
3 years +170.3%+94.6%+219.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +39.3%+24.9%+47.3% +23.5%
5 years +85.2%-1.2%+124.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +13.1%-0.2%+17.5% +11.0%
10 years +467.7%+33.6%+422.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year +19.0%+2.9%+18.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureMSUSBGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.5%22.1%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.9%23.2%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.430.611.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.531.180.53 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.3%-54.7%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.7%-8.9%-19.6% -0.9%
52-week high $228.55$65.41$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $154.37$45.47$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMSUSBGS
P/E now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 12.1x 11.9xmedian 12.1x 13.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x 3.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.1x 7.5xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.3xmedian 10.8x 7.4xmedian 10.8x -6.4xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.48median 1.32 0.98median 1.32 0.26median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMSUSBGS
Revenue $80.16B $29.58B $69.70B
Net income – $8.17B –
Free cash flow – $12.53B –
EPS (diluted) $12.65 $5.01 $69.89
Cash & equivalents – – $177.00B
Total debt – $96.01B –
Shares (diluted) 1.57B 1.56B 304.90M
Enterprise value $299.14B $93.35B $269.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMSUSBGS
P/E 14.9x 11.9x 13.0x
P/FCF -16.3x 7.4x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.4x –
P/S 3.7x 3.1x 3.9x
P/B – 1.4x 2.2x
P/Tangible book – 1.5x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 7.5x –
EV/EBIT – 7.8x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 6.4x 3.9x
EV/FCF – 15.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.48 0.98 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMSUSBGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.2% 6.7% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 3.2% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 18.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 12.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 29.2% 19.9% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.9% 12.2% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMSUSBGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 85.2% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 34.5% –
Net margin – 26.4% –
FCF margin – 42.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 42.3% –
Return on equity – 12.2% –
Return on assets 1.2% 1.1% –
Return on invested capital – 12.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMSUSBGS
Debt / assets – 13.2% –
Debt / equity – 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x –
Debt / FCF – 7.7x –
Liabilities / assets – 90.6% 94.3%
Equity / assets – 9.4% 5.7%
Interest coverage – 1.7x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMSUSBGS
Dividend yield 2.2% 3.5% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 2.2% 4.2% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 39.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMSUSBGS
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.66FY2026 $5.17FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +33.8%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.2% +18.8% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $80.05BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% +16.7% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMSUSBGS
Held by institutions 85.7% 81.6% 72.1%
Institutions holding 2,743 2,068 3,150
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% +2.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 1,469 965 1,553
Institutions selling 939 760 1,124
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.27 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MSUSBGS
MS 1.00 0.52 0.86
USB 0.52 1.00 0.48
GS 0.86 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MS, USB and GS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Morgan Stanley (MS) $299.14B, Us Bancorp (USB) $92.89B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $269.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, MS, USB and GS?

Us Bancorp (USB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.9x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.9x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Us Bancorp (USB) is cheapest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.9x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.5x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Morgan Stanley (MS) +16.2%, Us Bancorp (USB) +6.7%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Us Bancorp (USB) returned the most: Morgan Stanley (MS) +15.2%, Us Bancorp (USB) +26.1%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.9%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Morgan Stanley (MS) +13.1%/yr, Us Bancorp (USB) -0.2%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Us Bancorp (USB) has the highest dividend yield: Morgan Stanley (MS) 2.18%, Us Bancorp (USB) 3.52%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.94%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp (USB) has been the steadiest (Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.5%, Us Bancorp (USB) 22.1%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MS, USB and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Us Bancorp (USB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.