MRVL vs NVDA vs SIMO Stock Comparison

Marvell Technology, Nvidia and Silicon Motion Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$243.57 -7.0% 1M +174.6% 1Y
Market cap
$213.59B
P/E
82.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
0.10%
Semiconductor Design Technology
1 win
NVDA Nvidia Corp
$217.94 -3.2% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.25T
P/E
27.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$302.97B
Div. yield
0.24%
Semiconductor Design Technology
9 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Nvidia leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Nvidia 9, Silicon Motion Technology 2, Marvell Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRVLNVDASIMOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $213.59B $5.25T $6.85B NVDA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 82.8x 27.3x — NVDA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 59.1x 24.9x 17.8x SIMO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.6% +83.4% — NVDA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.9% 63.7% — NVDA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.8% 71.1% — NVDA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -0.2x — NVDA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.10% 0.24% 0.98% SIMO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +174.6% +13.8% +98.3% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.9%/yr +54.3%/yr +24.0%/yr NVDA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 37.7% 84.4% NVDA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 74/100 36/100 NVDA

Percentile Scorecard

MRVLNVDASIMO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRVLNVDASIMO
Valuation 29 #67 of 94 58 #40 of 94 14 #81 of 94
Growth 90 #10 of 92 97 #4 of 92 26 #68 of 92
Profitability 61 #36 of 90 99 #2 of 90 –
Financial Health 47 #53 of 99 65 #35 of 99 36 #64 of 99
Shareholder Returns 26 #54 of 73 49 #38 of 73 67 #25 of 73
Overall 51 74 36
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • NVDA ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SIMO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRVLNVDASIMOSPY
1 month -7.0%-3.2%-26.1% -0.2%
3 months +39.6%+10.6%-7.8% +3.9%
6 months +59.0%+2.2%+36.9% +8.2%
Year to date +186.6%+16.9%+120.2% +12.9%
1 year +174.6%+13.8%+98.3% +12.3%
3 years +415.4%+438.1%+287.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +72.8%+75.3%+57.2% +23.3%
5 years +255.7%+773.8%+192.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +28.9%+54.3%+24.0% +10.9%
10 years +1,756.5%+12,233.9%+339.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +33.9%+61.9%+16.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMRVLNVDASIMOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%37.7%84.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.9%36.6%78.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.231.942.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.210.371.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.1%-66.4%-59.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.0%-8.9%-39.4% -1.2%
52-week high $316.43$239.24$336.90 $779.14
52-week low $73.73$165.17$80.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRVLNVDASIMO
P/E now vs peer median 82.8xmedian 45.6x 27.3xmedian 45.6x —median 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 22.6xmedian 7.7x 17.3xmedian 7.7x —median 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 76.0xmedian 29.0x 25.9xmedian 29.0x —median 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 123.5xmedian 40.6x 41.4xmedian 40.6x -533.1xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 4.6x 22.9xmedian 4.6x 6.5xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.79median 2.28 0.16median 2.28 —median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRVLNVDASIMO
Revenue $9.45B $302.97B –
Gross profit $4.93B $226.24B –
Operating income $1.56B $197.58B –
Net income $2.64B $192.88B $289.77M
Free cash flow $1.73B $127.01B -$12.85M
R&D $2.44B $23.59B –
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $7.94 –
Cash & equivalents $3.93B $22.44B $74.37M
Total debt $4.96B $33.37B $167.29M
Shares (diluted) 921.20M 24.29B 33.68M
Enterprise value $200.46B $5.03T $6.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRVLNVDASIMO
P/E 82.8x 27.3x –
P/FCF 123.5x 41.4x -533.1x
P/Operating cash flow 97.1x 39.1x -102.8x
P/S 22.6x 17.3x –
P/B 11.5x 22.9x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 13.2x 23.2x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 76.0x 25.9x –
EV/EBIT 137.5x 26.4x –
EV/Revenue 22.7x 17.2x –
EV/FCF 124.0x 41.1x -531.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 97.5x 38.9x -102.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.79 0.16 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRVLNVDASIMO
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.6% 83.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.9% 110.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 52.8% 96.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 120.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,577% 105.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 100.2% 163.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 2,653% 122.7% 270.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 107.8% 165.3% 49.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 2,512% 125.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 104.2% 167.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% 74.4% -182.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 124.3% -36.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.8% 76.3% -109.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 130.9% -27.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRVLNVDASIMO
Gross margin 52.2% 74.7% –
EBITDA margin 29.9% 66.4% –
Operating margin 16.5% 65.2% –
Pretax margin 32.4% 75.8% –
Net margin 27.9% 63.7% –
FCF margin 18.3% 41.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% 44.3% –
Return on equity 14.4% 90.9% –
Return on assets 9.7% 66.5% –
Return on invested capital 5.8% 71.1% –
Return on capital employed 6.3% 80.0% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 0.7x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 8.8% 2.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRVLNVDASIMO
Debt / assets 18.0% 10.4% 3.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -0.2x –
Debt / FCF 2.9x 0.3x -4.6x
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 28.5% 34.8%
Equity / assets 67.3% 71.5% 65.2%
Interest coverage 7.2x – –
Current ratio 3.2x 4.6x 2.5x
Quick ratio 2.5x 3.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.6x 1.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 15.05 39.04 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRVLNVDASIMO
Dividend yield 0.1% 0.2% 1.0%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.3% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRVLNVDASIMO
Forward P/E 59.1xFY2026 24.9xFY2026 17.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.12FY2026 $8.76FY2026 $11.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +45.1%FY2026 +83.6%FY2026 +223.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +83.5% +91.8% +37.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.42BFY2026 $383.27BFY2026 $1.82BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +39.5%FY2026 +77.5%FY2026 +105.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +80.2% +85.7% +27.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRVLNVDASIMO
Held by institutions 78.7% 69.0% 72.4%
Institutions holding 2,215 5,924 380
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +4.0% -9.8%
Institutions buying 1,431 3,280 223
Institutions selling 646 2,313 131
Buyers to sellers 2.22 1.42 1.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRVLNVDASIMO
MRVL 1.00 0.42 0.50
NVDA 0.42 1.00 0.32
SIMO 0.50 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRVL, NVDA and SIMO?

Nvidia (NVDA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Marvell Technology (MRVL) $213.59B, Nvidia (NVDA) $5.25T, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) $6.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRVL, NVDA and SIMO?

Nvidia (NVDA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 82.8x, Nvidia (NVDA) 27.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) is cheapest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 59.1x, Nvidia (NVDA) 24.9x, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 17.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nvidia (NVDA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%, Nvidia (NVDA) +83.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nvidia (NVDA) has the highest net margin (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%, Nvidia (NVDA) 63.7%). On return on invested capital, Nvidia (NVDA) leads (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 5.8%, Nvidia (NVDA) 71.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Marvell Technology (MRVL) +174.6%, Nvidia (NVDA) +13.8%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +98.3%. Over five years, Nvidia (NVDA) compounded fastest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.9%/yr, Nvidia (NVDA) +54.3%/yr, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +24.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) has the highest dividend yield: Marvell Technology (MRVL) 0.10%, Nvidia (NVDA) 0.24%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 0.98%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nvidia (NVDA) has been the steadiest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%, Nvidia (NVDA) 37.7%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 84.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRVL, NVDA and SIMO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nvidia (NVDA) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.