MRP vs FPH vs FOR Stock Comparison

Millrose Properties, Five Point Holdings and Forestar Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HHH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MRP Millrose Properties, Inc.
$26.80 +8.9% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.13B
P/E
9.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$760.54M
Div. yield
11.46%
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.26 -6.4% 1M -27.2% 1Y
Market cap
$630.55M
P/E
11.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
FOR Forestar Group Inc.
$24.52 -4.8% 1M -5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.25B
P/E
7.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Millrose Properties leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Millrose Properties 4, Forestar 4, Five Point Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMRPFPHFORLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.13B $630.55M $1.25B MRP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.3x 11.0x 7.4x FOR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.2x 3.9x 9.1x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -39.1% +11.8% FOR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 62.6% 24.9% 9.9% MRP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.5% -4.0% 6.1% MRP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.7x 1.8x FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 11.46% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.8% -27.2% -5.7% FOR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.2%/yr +3.4%/yr FOR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 29.5% 33.1% FPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 91/100 52/100 57/100 MRP

Percentile Scorecard

MRPFPHFOR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMRPFPHFOR
Valuation 89 #5 of 38 57 #17 of 38 95 #3 of 38
Growth 100 #1 of 33 31 #23 of 33 53 #16 of 33
Profitability 97 #2 of 31 43 #18 of 31 70 #10 of 31
Financial Health 67 #13 of 37 75 #10 of 37 44 #21 of 37
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 14 – 23 #11 of 14
Overall 91 52 57
  • MRP ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • FPH ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • FOR ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMRPFPHFORSPY
1 month +8.9%-6.4%-4.8% -2.3%
3 months -6.5%-16.8%-15.2% -0.7%
6 months -9.3%-12.3%-6.5% +4.8%
Year to date -10.3%-23.8%-0.4% +10.3%
1 year -16.8%-27.2%-5.7% +10.3%
3 years —+62.0%-7.3% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+17.5%-2.5% +20.1%
5 years —-44.7%+18.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year —-11.2%+3.4% +10.1%
10 years ——+128.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year ——+8.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMRPFPHFORSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%29.5%33.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.9%30.3%32.3% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.730.520.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.92-0.17 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.3%-74.3%-54.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.7%-32.4%-23.3% -3.5%
52-week high $32.18$6.30$31.98 $779.14
52-week low $21.21$4.08$23.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMRPFPHFOR
P/E now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 7.4x 11.0xmedian 7.4x 7.4xmedian 7.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 4.8x 5.3xmedian 4.8x 0.7xmedian 4.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.2x -5.8xmedian 11.2x 7.6xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 6.2x 104.9xmedian 6.2x 4.4xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.7xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 0.34median 0.34 1.57median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMRPFPHFOR
Revenue $760.54M $118.00M $1.72B
Gross profit – -$10.11M $368.90M
Operating income $647.29M -$131.54M $213.60M
Net income $476.06M $79.23M $170.50M
Free cash flow $3.75B $6.01M $282.90M
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $0.39 $3.32
Cash & equivalents $34.17M $358.72M $394.90M
Total debt $2.48B $444.40M $793.80M
Shares (diluted) 166.06M 76.10M 51.30M
Enterprise value $3.77B $648.27M -$96.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMRPFPHFOR
P/E 9.3x 11.0x 7.4x
P/FCF 1.1x 104.9x 4.4x
P/Operating cash flow 1.1x 99.4x 4.4x
P/S 5.4x 5.3x 0.7x
P/B 0.7x 0.3x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 0.3x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA – -5.8x 7.6x
EV/EBIT 10.2x -5.4x 7.7x
EV/Revenue 8.6x 6.1x 1.0x
EV/FCF 1.8x 119.2x 5.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.8x 112.9x 5.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.34 1.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMRPFPHFOR
Revenue growth (1Y) – -39.1% 11.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 10.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 90.0% 6.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 53.6% 9.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,405% 51.4% 5.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.7% 5.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,962% -67.8% 4.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 890.5% -6.4% 4.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 32.9% 4.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3,932% -97.0% 184.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -50.3% 3.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 589.0% -97.1% 183.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -51.2% 3.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMRPFPHFOR
Gross margin – -8.6% 21.4%
EBITDA margin – -103.9% 12.6%
Operating margin 85.1% -111.5% 12.4%
Pretax margin 65.1% 79.1% 13.1%
Net margin 62.6% 24.9% 9.9%
FCF margin 492.6% 5.1% 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin 492.6% 5.4% 16.5%
Return on equity 8.1% 3.4% 9.3%
Return on assets 4.9% 2.5% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 7.5% -4.0% 6.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 7.9x 0.1x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 7.0% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMRPFPHFOR
Debt / assets 25.5% 13.8% 24.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.7x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 0.7x 73.9x 2.8x
Liabilities / assets 39.7% 27.7% 42.3%
Equity / assets 60.3% 72.3% 57.7%
Interest coverage 4.1x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMRPFPHFOR
Dividend yield 11.5% – –
Net buyback yield – – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 11.5% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 102.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 13.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMRPFPHFOR
Forward P/E 8.2xFY2026 3.9xFY2023 9.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.26FY2026 $1.09FY2023 $2.68FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +33.6%FY2026 – -4.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after -7.1% -136.7% +7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $840.33MFY2026 $559.28MFY2023 $1.79BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +39.9%FY2026 – +9.6%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +11.7% -90.5% -11.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMRPFPHFOR
Held by institutions 83.2% 25.2% 36.6%
Institutions holding 524 88 185
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +0.3% +0.1%
Institutions buying 281 37 97
Institutions selling 136 28 49
Buyers to sellers 2.07 1.32 1.98

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MRPFPHFOR
MRP 1.00 0.45 0.53
FPH 0.45 1.00 0.43
FOR 0.53 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MRP, FPH and FOR?

Millrose Properties (MRP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Millrose Properties (MRP) $4.13B, Five Point Holdings (FPH) $630.55M, Forestar (FOR) $1.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, MRP, FPH and FOR?

Forestar (FOR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Millrose Properties (MRP) 9.3x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 11.0x, Forestar (FOR) 7.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Millrose Properties (MRP) 8.2x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.9x, Forestar (FOR) 9.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Forestar (FOR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, Forestar (FOR) +11.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Millrose Properties (MRP) has the highest net margin (Millrose Properties (MRP) 62.6%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, Forestar (FOR) 9.9%). On return on invested capital, Millrose Properties (MRP) leads (Millrose Properties (MRP) 7.5%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%, Forestar (FOR) 6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Forestar (FOR) returned the most: Millrose Properties (MRP) -16.8%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -27.2%, Forestar (FOR) -5.7%. Over five years, Forestar (FOR) compounded fastest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.2%/yr, Forestar (FOR) +3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Millrose Properties (MRP) 11.46%. Five Point Holdings (FPH) and Forestar (FOR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Five Point Holdings (FPH) has been the steadiest (Millrose Properties (MRP) 32.5%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.5%, Forestar (FOR) 33.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MRP, FPH and FOR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Millrose Properties (MRP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.