MPWR vs SIMO vs SNDK Stock Comparison

Monolithic Power Systems, Silicon Motion Technology and Sandisk Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (QCOM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNDK Sandisk Corp
$1,304.84 -26.6% 1M +639.3% 1Y
Market cap
$205.67B
P/E
18.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.25B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sandisk leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Sandisk 7, Silicon Motion Technology 1, Monolithic Power Systems 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMPWRSIMOSNDKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $59.41B $7.36B $205.67B SNDK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 74.1x — 18.0x SNDK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 46.0x 17.8x 6.3x SNDK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.7% — +175.3% SNDK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.5% — 56.5% SNDK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 73.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.7% +98.3% +639.3% SNDK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.1%/yr +24.0%/yr — SIMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.0% 84.4% 111.5% MPWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 36/100 79/100 SNDK

Percentile Scorecard

MPWRSIMOSNDK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMPWRSIMOSNDK
Valuation 26 #70 of 94 14 #81 of 94 66 #39 of 112
Growth 68 #30 of 92 26 #68 of 92 100 #1 of 109
Profitability 81 #18 of 90 – 100 #1 of 104
Financial Health 79 #22 of 99 36 #64 of 99 82 #22 of 116
Shareholder Returns 46 #40 of 73 67 #25 of 73 49 #42 of 81
Overall 60 36 79
  • MPWR ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SIMO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SNDK ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMPWRSIMOSNDKSPY
1 month -11.4%-26.1%-26.6% -0.2%
3 months -5.5%-7.8%+19.0% +3.9%
6 months -19.4%+36.9%+30.2% +8.2%
Year to date +33.7%+120.2%+449.7% +12.9%
1 year +9.7%+98.3%+639.3% +12.3%
3 years +198.5%+287.9%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +44.0%+57.2%— +23.3%
5 years +120.5%+192.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +17.1%+24.0%— +10.9%
10 years +1,433.8%+339.9%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +31.4%+16.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMPWRSIMOSNDKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.0%84.4%111.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.1%78.0%105.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.582.423.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.181.165.73 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-59.1%-56.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.3%-39.4%-44.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1,689.89$336.90$2,335.00 $779.14
52-week low $856.96$80.16$175.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMPWRSIMOSNDK
P/E now vs peer median 74.3xmedian 45.6x —median 45.6x 16.8xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 7.7x —median 7.7x 9.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 58.1xmedian 29.0x —median 29.0x 14.8xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 102.2xmedian 40.6x -533.1xmedian 40.6x 16.6xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 4.6x 6.5xmedian 4.6x 12.1xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.61median 2.28 —median 2.28 —median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMPWRSIMOSNDK
Revenue $3.27B – $20.25B
Gross profit $1.81B – $14.47B
Operating income $940.17M – $12.39B
Net income $801.95M $289.77M $11.43B
Free cash flow $582.61M -$12.85M $11.49B
R&D $412.95M – $1.33B
EPS (diluted) $16.28 – $73.76
Cash & equivalents $1.01B $74.37M $4.76B
Total debt – $167.29M –
Shares (diluted) 49.26M 33.68M 155.00M
Enterprise value $54.10B $6.75B $194.19B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMPWRSIMOSNDK
P/E 74.3x – 16.8x
P/FCF 102.2x -533.1x 16.6x
P/Operating cash flow 72.4x -102.8x 16.3x
P/S 18.2x – 9.4x
P/B 15.3x 6.5x 12.1x
P/Tangible book 15.3x 7.2x 12.1x
EV/EBITDA 58.1x – 14.8x
EV/EBIT 61.8x – 15.0x
EV/Revenue 17.8x – 9.2x
EV/FCF 99.8x -531.9x 16.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 70.7x -102.6x 15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.61 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMPWRSIMOSNDK
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.7% – 175.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.4% – 554.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.3% – 999.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -52.0% 270.6% 796.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.0% 49.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -53.2% – 751.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 20.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.0% -182.4% 13,794%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.8% -36.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.5% -109.8% 9,678%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.9% -27.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMPWRSIMOSNDK
Gross margin 55.2% – 71.5%
EBITDA margin 30.6% – 62.0%
Operating margin 28.7% – 61.2%
Pretax margin 30.1% – 64.3%
Net margin 24.5% – 56.5%
FCF margin 17.8% – 56.8%
Operating cash flow margin 25.1% – 57.6%
Return on equity 21.2% – 77.5%
Return on assets 17.6% – 57.8%
Return on invested capital – – 73.7%
Return on capital employed 23.1% – 87.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x -0.2x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMPWRSIMOSNDK
Debt / assets – 3.7% –
Debt / equity – 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – -4.6x –
Liabilities / assets 16.9% 34.8% 30.1%
Equity / assets 83.1% 65.2% 69.9%
Interest coverage – – 169.7x
Current ratio 5.0x 2.5x 2.3x
Quick ratio 3.5x 0.8x 12.2x
Cash ratio 2.8x 0.2x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 47.91 – 20.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMPWRSIMOSNDK
Dividend yield 0.6% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 1.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMPWRSIMOSNDK
Forward P/E 46.0xFY2026 17.8xFY2026 6.3xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $26.37FY2026 $11.50FY2026 $206.11FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +48.4%FY2026 +223.9%FY2026 +190.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +41.9% +37.5% +36.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.27BFY2026 $1.82BFY2026 $50.93BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +53.1%FY2026 +105.0%FY2026 +151.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +34.8% +27.4% +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMPWRSIMOSNDK
Held by institutions 96.9% 72.4% –
Institutions holding 1,246 380 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% -9.8% –
Institutions buying 641 223 –
Institutions selling 459 131 –
Buyers to sellers 1.40 1.70 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MPWRSIMOSNDK
MPWR 1.00 0.51 0.54
SIMO 0.51 1.00 0.52
SNDK 0.54 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MPWR, SIMO and SNDK?

Sandisk (SNDK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) $59.41B, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) $7.36B, Sandisk (SNDK) $205.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, MPWR, SIMO and SNDK?

Sandisk (SNDK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 74.1x, Sandisk (SNDK) 18.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sandisk (SNDK) is cheapest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 46.0x, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 17.8x, Sandisk (SNDK) 6.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sandisk (SNDK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +28.7%, Sandisk (SNDK) +175.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sandisk (SNDK) has the highest net margin (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 24.5%, Sandisk (SNDK) 56.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sandisk (SNDK) returned the most: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +9.7%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +98.3%, Sandisk (SNDK) +639.3%. Over five years, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) compounded fastest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +17.1%/yr, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +24.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) has been the steadiest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 55.0%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 84.4%, Sandisk (SNDK) 111.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MPWR, SIMO and SNDK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sandisk (SNDK) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.