MPWR vs AVGO vs MRVL Stock Comparison

Monolithic Power Systems, Broadcom and Marvell Technology Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LSCC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AVGO Broadcom Inc.
$345.00 -2.8% 1M -10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.54T
P/E
40.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.10B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
9 wins
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$218.34 -17.1% 1M +142.2% 1Y
Market cap
$175.11B
P/E
66.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Broadcom leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Broadcom 9, Marvell Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMPWRAVGOMRVLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.88B $1.54T $175.11B AVGO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 65.9x 40.3x 66.3x AVGO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.5x 31.3x 53.0x AVGO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +40.5% +48.7% +30.6% AVGO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 42.9% 27.9% AVGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.0% 5.8% AVGO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x 0.4x MRVL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.6% -10.6% +142.2% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.9%/yr +45.4%/yr +26.1%/yr AVGO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.9% 46.3% 80.5% AVGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 64/100 50/100 AVGO

Percentile Scorecard

MPWRAVGOMRVL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMPWRAVGOMRVL
Valuation 17 #78 of 94 43 #54 of 94 32 #64 of 94
Growth 84 #16 of 92 90 #10 of 92 89 #11 of 92
Profitability 98 #3 of 88 93 #7 of 88 60 #36 of 88
Financial Health 73 #27 of 96 35 #63 of 96 43 #55 of 96
Shareholder Returns 41 #43 of 72 59 #30 of 72 25 #54 of 72
Overall 62 64 50
  • MPWR ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • AVGO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMPWRAVGOMRVLSPY
1 month -11.6%-2.8%-17.1% +0.7%
3 months -8.9%-11.0%+19.1% +3.7%
6 months -25.7%-17.4%+32.2% +7.1%
Year to date +32.3%-0.3%+156.9% +12.8%
1 year +9.6%-10.6%+142.2% +11.9%
3 years +196.7%+310.1%+366.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +43.7%+60.1%+67.1% +22.8%
5 years +128.1%+548.9%+218.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.9%+45.4%+26.1% +10.9%
10 years +1,437.5%+1,937.8%+1,566.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +31.4%+35.2%+32.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMPWRAVGOMRVLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.9%46.3%80.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.8%48.5%77.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.582.183.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.17-0.231.77 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-41.5%-62.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.1%-28.4%-31.0% -1.2%
52-week high $1,689.89$481.57$316.43 $779.14
52-week low $856.96$293.41$73.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMPWRAVGOMRVL
P/E now vs peer median 65.9xmedian 46.4x 43.0xmedian 46.4x 74.2xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 7.8x 18.5xmedian 7.8x 20.3xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 27.5x 32.4xmedian 27.5x 68.2xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 114.4xmedian 40.1x 41.8xmedian 40.1x 110.7xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 4.7x 16.5xmedian 4.7x 10.3xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.60median 2.10 1.26median 2.10 0.71median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMPWRAVGOMRVL
Revenue $3.74B $89.10B $9.45B
Gross profit $2.07B $61.28B $4.93B
Operating income $1.10B $42.81B $1.56B
Net income – $38.27B $2.64B
Free cash flow – $39.40B $1.73B
R&D $455.36M $11.84B $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $18.13 $7.83 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $560.54M $23.98B $3.93B
Total debt – $59.42B $4.96B
Shares (diluted) 49.26M 4.89B 921.20M
Enterprise value $58.88B $1.47T $161.98B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMPWRAVGOMRVL
P/E 65.9x 43.0x 74.2x
P/FCF 114.4x 41.8x 110.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 40.5x 87.0x
P/S 15.8x 18.5x 20.3x
P/B 15.8x 16.5x 10.3x
P/Tangible book 15.8x 22.4x 11.8x
EV/EBITDA – 32.4x 68.2x
EV/EBIT – 39.3x 123.3x
EV/Revenue 15.8x 18.9x 20.4x
EV/FCF – 42.7x 111.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 41.4x 87.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.60 1.26 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMPWRAVGOMRVL
Revenue growth (1Y) 40.5% 48.7% 30.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.0% 36.0% 18.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 40.6% 53.0% 52.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.8% 36.3% 25.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.3% 89.4% 1,577%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.4% 39.0% 100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 102.1% 2,653%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.1% 107.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.9% 101.0% 2,512%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.3% 34.1% 104.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 59.8% 19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.6% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 58.1% 12.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.4% 30.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMPWRAVGOMRVL
Gross margin – 68.8% 52.2%
EBITDA margin – 58.2% 29.9%
Operating margin – 48.0% 16.5%
Pretax margin – 45.4% 32.4%
Net margin – 42.9% 27.9%
FCF margin – 44.2% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 45.6% 23.3%
Return on equity 23.4% 40.8% 14.4%
Return on assets 19.1% 20.8% 9.7%
Return on invested capital – 26.0% 5.8%
Return on capital employed – 26.3% 6.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.5% 8.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMPWRAVGOMRVL
Debt / assets – 31.6% 18.0%
Debt / equity – 0.6x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x 0.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 20.1% 47.0% 32.7%
Equity / assets 79.9% 53.0% 67.3%
Interest coverage – 13.7x 7.2x
Current ratio 3.7x 2.5x 3.2x
Quick ratio – 2.2x 2.5x
Cash ratio – 1.2x 1.6x
Altman Z-score – 12.76 13.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMPWRAVGOMRVL
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.8% 0.1%
Net buyback yield – 0.5% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 1.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMPWRAVGOMRVL
Forward P/E 45.5xFY2026 31.3xFY2026 53.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $26.37FY2026 $11.01FY2026 $4.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +48.4%FY2026 +61.4%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +41.9% +68.8% +83.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.27BFY2026 $102.00BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +53.1%FY2026 +59.7%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.8% +61.2% +80.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMPWRAVGOMRVL
Held by institutions 96.9% 78.1% 78.7%
Institutions holding 1,247 4,800 2,217
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% +3.7% +0.1%
Institutions buying 642 2,638 1,432
Institutions selling 459 1,843 647
Buyers to sellers 1.40 1.43 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MPWRAVGOMRVL
MPWR 1.00 0.53 0.62
AVGO 0.53 1.00 0.52
MRVL 0.62 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MPWR, AVGO and MRVL?

Broadcom (AVGO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) $58.88B, Broadcom (AVGO) $1.54T, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $175.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, MPWR, AVGO and MRVL?

Broadcom (AVGO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 65.9x, Broadcom (AVGO) 40.3x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 66.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Broadcom (AVGO) is cheapest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 45.5x, Broadcom (AVGO) 31.3x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 53.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Broadcom (AVGO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +40.5%, Broadcom (AVGO) +48.7%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Broadcom (AVGO) has the highest net margin (Broadcom (AVGO) 42.9%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%). On return on invested capital, Broadcom (AVGO) leads (Broadcom (AVGO) 26.0%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +9.6%, Broadcom (AVGO) -10.6%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +142.2%. Over five years, Broadcom (AVGO) compounded fastest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +17.9%/yr, Broadcom (AVGO) +45.4%/yr, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +26.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Broadcom (AVGO) has been the steadiest (Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 54.9%, Broadcom (AVGO) 46.3%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 80.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MPWR, AVGO and MRVL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Broadcom (AVGO) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.