MNRO vs INEO vs ABG Stock Comparison

Monro, INNEOVA Holdings and Asbury Automotive Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AZO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MNRO Monro, Inc.
$11.63 -18.0% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$380.08M
P/E
476.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
1 win
INEO INNEOVA Holdings Ltd
$0.56 -5.1% 1M -33.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.21M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Distribution Industrials
ABG Asbury Automotive Group Inc
$197.76 +12.5% 1M -15.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.83B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.59B
Div. yield
–
Auto Dealerships Consumer Discretionary
10 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Asbury Automotive leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Asbury Automotive 10, Monro 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMNROINEOABGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $380.08M $8.21M $3.83B ABG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 476.3x — 8.2x ABG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 96.9x — 7.3x ABG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.4% — -1.3% ABG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.1% — 2.7% ABG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% — 7.6% ABG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.5x — 3.9x MNRO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.7% -33.9% -15.8% ABG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -28.3%/yr — +1.4%/yr ABG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.7% 100.6% 37.5% ABG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 — 59/100 ABG

Percentile Scorecard

MNROINEOABG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMNROINEOABG
Valuation 75 #28 of 107 – 89 #13 of 107
Growth 12 #91 of 103 – 28 #74 of 103
Profitability 33 #69 of 102 – 58 #43 of 102
Financial Health 31 #78 of 113 0 #49 of 49 24 #86 of 113
Shareholder Returns 96 #4 of 76 – 95 #5 of 76
Overall 49 – 59
  • MNRO ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • INEO ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • ABG ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMNROINEOABGSPY
1 month -18.0%-5.1%+12.5% -2.0%
3 months -11.2%-9.7%-10.9% -2.2%
6 months -32.1%-5.2%-0.4% +4.2%
Year to date -42.0%+10.0%-15.0% +10.6%
1 year -22.7%-33.9%-15.8% +10.4%
3 years -56.7%—-5.8% +73.6%
3 years, per year -24.3%—-2.0% +20.2%
5 years -81.0%—+7.2% +61.6%
5 years, per year -28.3%—+1.4% +10.1%
10 years -78.2%—+304.8% +261.3%
10 years, per year -14.1%—+15.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMNROINEOABGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.7%100.6%37.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.3%99.2%37.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.950.490.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.37-0.34-0.42 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.5%-92.8%-47.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.2%-33.9%-22.8% -3.2%
52-week high $23.81$0.85$256.03 $779.14
52-week low $11.27$0.46$161.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMNROINEOABG
P/E now vs peer median 456.1xmedian 17.7x —median 26.0x 7.7xmedian 17.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.5x —median 1.0x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 9.1x —median 13.3x 8.1xmedian 9.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 15.7x —median 22.2x 8.4xmedian 15.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.7x 1.8xmedian 2.5x 0.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -6.39median 0.83 —median 2.22 -0.48median 0.83

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMNROINEOABG
Revenue $1.14B – $17.59B
Gross profit $395.59M – $3.00B
Operating income $19.64M – $746.30M
Net income $798.00K – $467.50M
Free cash flow $12.39M – $420.70M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 – $25.55
Cash & equivalents $14.96M $644.00K $84.50M
Total debt $136.34M $18.73M $3.37B
Shares (diluted) 31.30M 14.40M 18.30M
Enterprise value $336.05M $3.14M $3.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMNROINEOABG
P/E 456.1x – 7.7x
P/FCF 29.4x – 8.4x
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x – 4.6x
P/S 0.3x – 0.2x
P/B 0.6x 1.8x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 1.8x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 6.0x – 8.1x
EV/EBIT 24.7x – 9.2x
EV/Revenue 0.4x – 0.4x
EV/FCF 39.2x – 16.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.0x – 8.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.39 – -0.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMNROINEOABG
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.4% – -1.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.2% – 6.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.0% – -0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -4.0% – 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 372.4% – -23.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -34.4% – -13.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 104.2% – -16.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -71.7% – -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 104.2% – -10.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -71.4% – -16.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -40.3% – -11.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -38.8% – 41.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -74.4% – -33.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -57.2% – 38.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMNROINEOABG
Gross margin 34.8% – 17.1%
EBITDA margin 7.2% – 4.8%
Operating margin 1.7% – 4.2%
Pretax margin 0.1% – 3.5%
Net margin 0.1% – 2.7%
FCF margin 1.1% – 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin 3.9% – 4.4%
Return on equity 0.1% – 11.8%
Return on assets 0.1% – 4.1%
Return on invested capital 1.5% – 7.6%
Return on capital employed 1.9% – 9.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x – 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 55.5x – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMNROINEOABG
Debt / assets 8.8% 39.4% 29.7%
Debt / equity 0.2x 3.6x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.5x – 3.9x
Debt / FCF 11.0x – 8.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.9% 89.1% 64.5%
Equity / assets 37.1% 10.9% 35.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.31 – 2.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMNROINEOABG
Dividend yield 9.6% – –
Net buyback yield – – 9.6%
Shareholder yield 9.6% – 9.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMNROINEOABG
Forward P/E 96.9xFY2026 – 7.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 – $26.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -71.4%FY2026 – -4.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +275.0% – +12.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.18BFY2026 – $16.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.9%FY2026 – -8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.6% – +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMNROINEOABG
Held by institutions 100.0% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 183 – 315
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.2% – -2.4%
Institutions buying 96 – 173
Institutions selling 66 – 106
Buyers to sellers 1.45 – 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MNROINEOABG
MNRO 1.00 0.00 0.30
INEO 0.00 1.00 -0.02
ABG 0.30 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MNRO, INEO and ABG?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Monro (MNRO) $380.08M, INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) $8.21M, Asbury Automotive (ABG) $3.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, MNRO, INEO and ABG?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Monro (MNRO) 476.3x, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 8.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Asbury Automotive (ABG) is cheapest (Monro (MNRO) 96.9x, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 7.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Monro (MNRO) -4.4%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) -1.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) has the highest net margin (Monro (MNRO) 0.1%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 2.7%). On return on invested capital, Asbury Automotive (ABG) leads (Monro (MNRO) 1.5%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asbury Automotive (ABG) returned the most: Monro (MNRO) -22.7%, INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) -33.9%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) -15.8%. Over five years, Asbury Automotive (ABG) compounded fastest (Monro (MNRO) -28.3%/yr, Asbury Automotive (ABG) +1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asbury Automotive (ABG) has been the steadiest (Monro (MNRO) 61.7%, INNEOVA Holdings (INEO) 100.6%, Asbury Automotive (ABG) 37.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MNRO, INEO and ABG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asbury Automotive (ABG) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.