MMM vs PBI vs NDSN Stock Comparison

3M, Pitney Bowes and Nordson Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DOV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MMM 3M Co
$177.04 +9.4% 1M +9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$100.34B
P/E
28.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc /De/
$15.51 -7.4% 1M +57.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.20B
P/E
11.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.86B
Div. yield
0.02%
Office Equipment Industrials
6 wins
NDSN Nordson Corp
$331.06 -0.7% 1M +44.2% 1Y
Market cap
$18.36B
P/E
33.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Pitney Bowes leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Pitney Bowes 6, 3M 3, Nordson 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMMMPBINDSNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $100.34B $2.20B $18.36B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.4x 11.7x 33.1x PBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.9x 8.7x 29.7x PBI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% -3.5% +7.0% NDSN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.0% 10.1% 18.6% NDSN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.0% 20.3% 13.1% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 3.9x 1.7x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.01% PBI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.2% +57.8% +44.2% PBI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.2%/yr +16.2%/yr +4.7%/yr PBI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.7% 32.7% 22.3% NDSN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 79/100 58/100 PBI

Percentile Scorecard

MMMPBINDSN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMMMPBINDSN
Valuation 36 #132 of 204 97 #5 of 114 30 #144 of 204
Growth 63 #71 of 191 92 #9 of 98 58 #81 of 191
Profitability 87 #25 of 189 96 #5 of 95 96 #8 of 189
Financial Health 19 #180 of 221 18 #104 of 126 54 #102 of 221
Shareholder Returns 41 #93 of 158 91 #7 of 70 53 #75 of 158
Overall 49 79 58
  • MMM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • PBI ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • NDSN ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMMMPBINDSNSPY
1 month +9.4%-7.4%-0.7% -2.0%
3 months -2.4%-15.6%+6.9% -2.2%
6 months +24.0%-0.2%+17.1% +4.2%
Year to date +10.6%+46.7%+37.7% +10.6%
1 year +9.2%+57.8%+44.2% +10.4%
3 years +125.6%+277.4%+49.4% +73.6%
3 years, per year +31.2%+55.7%+14.3% +20.2%
5 years +17.2%+111.6%+26.0% +61.6%
5 years, per year +3.2%+16.2%+4.7% +10.1%
10 years +26.9%+5.4%+241.4% +261.3%
10 years, per year +2.4%+0.5%+13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMMMPBINDSNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.7%32.7%22.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.4%30.9%21.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.700.650.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.361.771.98 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.4%-70.9%-39.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.7%-16.3%-1.1% -3.2%
52-week high $183.81$18.52$334.70 $779.14
52-week low $141.20$9.02$226.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMMMPBINDSN
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 25.4x 11.3xmedian 20.8x 33.2xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x 6.2xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 14.5x 9.0xmedian 11.9x 21.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.2xmedian 23.6x 4.2xmedian 15.0x 25.5xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 2.2x -2.5xmedian 2.4x 5.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.72median 1.21 0.22median 1.08 7.55median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMMMPBINDSN
Revenue $25.25B $1.86B $2.98B
Gross profit $9.98B $1.06B $1.65B
Operating income $4.74B $305.03M $800.96M
Net income $3.58B $188.05M $555.18M
Free cash flow $2.68B $504.62M $724.01M
R&D $1.21B $14.07M –
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $1.34 $9.91
Cash & equivalents $4.84B $268.51M $113.43M
Total debt $15.00B $1.89B $1.73B
Shares (diluted) 522.60M 140.73M 56.03M
Enterprise value $81.78B $1.03B $17.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMMMPBINDSN
P/E 26.0x 11.3x 33.2x
P/FCF 34.2x 4.2x 25.5x
P/Operating cash flow 25.2x 3.7x 23.8x
P/S 3.6x 1.1x 6.2x
P/B 21.9x -2.5x 5.6x
P/Tangible book 43.2x -2.5x 7.0x
EV/EBITDA 16.4x 9.0x 21.6x
EV/EBIT 21.4x 12.2x 25.0x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 2.0x 6.7x
EV/FCF 37.9x 7.3x 27.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x 6.5x 25.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.72 0.22 7.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBINDSN
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% -3.5% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.7% 9.8% 4.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% -2.2% 8.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.0% -0.3% 5.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.7% 87.0% 18.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 35.9% 6.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.8% 135.1% 22.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 47.5% 3.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.1% 184.6% 23.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.8% 52.0% 4.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.8% 94.2% 26.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.1% 12.2% 5.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 124.1% 33.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.0% 11.1% 5.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMMMPBINDSN
Gross margin 39.5% 57.1% 55.3%
EBITDA margin 24.4% 22.1% 31.2%
Operating margin 18.8% 16.4% 26.9%
Pretax margin 17.5% 13.7% 22.6%
Net margin 14.0% 10.1% 18.6%
FCF margin 10.6% 27.1% 24.3%
Operating cash flow margin 14.4% 30.6% 26.0%
Return on equity 101.3% – 17.2%
Return on assets 9.8% 6.3% 9.3%
Return on invested capital 22.0% 20.3% 13.1%
Return on capital employed 18.7% 20.2% 15.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 3.0x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.9% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMMMPBINDSN
Debt / assets 37.9% 63.1% 29.1%
Debt / equity 3.6x -2.3x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 3.9x 1.7x
Debt / FCF 5.6x 3.7x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 128.0% 45.0%
Equity / assets 10.5% -28.0% 55.0%
Interest coverage – 6.0x 8.8x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.7x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.14 2.39 6.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMMMPBINDSN
Dividend yield 1.7% 2.5% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 3.0% 15.8% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 4.7% 18.2% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 44.8% 29.1% 33.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.9% 10.9% 25.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.2% 19.0% 3.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 16.0% 7.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMMMPBINDSN
Forward P/E 19.9xFY2026 8.7xFY2026 29.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.88FY2026 $1.79FY2026 $11.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +32.6%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +5.0% +21.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.87BFY2026 $1.77BFY2026 $3.19BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.8%FY2026 -6.3%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +10.9% +5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMMMPBINDSN
Held by institutions 74.5% 88.8% 76.0%
Institutions holding 2,212 351 757
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +2.6% +3.1%
Institutions buying 916 168 390
Institutions selling 839 119 241
Buyers to sellers 1.09 1.41 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MMMPBINDSN
MMM 1.00 0.14 0.47
PBI 0.14 1.00 0.16
NDSN 0.47 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MMM, PBI and NDSN?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: 3M (MMM) $100.34B, Pitney Bowes (PBI) $2.20B, Nordson (NDSN) $18.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, MMM, PBI and NDSN?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (3M (MMM) 28.4x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 11.7x, Nordson (NDSN) 33.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 19.9x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 8.7x, Nordson (NDSN) 29.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nordson (NDSN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -3.5%, Nordson (NDSN) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nordson (NDSN) has the highest net margin (3M (MMM) 14.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 10.1%, Nordson (NDSN) 18.6%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 20.3%, Nordson (NDSN) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pitney Bowes (PBI) returned the most: 3M (MMM) +9.2%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +57.8%, Nordson (NDSN) +44.2%. Over five years, Pitney Bowes (PBI) compounded fastest (3M (MMM) +3.2%/yr, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +16.2%/yr, Nordson (NDSN) +4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) has the highest dividend yield: 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 0.02%, Nordson (NDSN) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nordson (NDSN) has been the steadiest (3M (MMM) 25.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 32.7%, Nordson (NDSN) 22.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MMM, PBI and NDSN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pitney Bowes (PBI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.