MKSI vs LRCX vs ASML Stock Comparison

Mks, Lam Research and Asml Holding Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KLAC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MKSI Mks Inc
$194.95 -30.5% 1M +42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$13.18B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.35B
Div. yield
0.50%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$221.43 -36.0% 1M +42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$276.60B
P/E
32.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.50%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
6 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,496.30 -19.5% 1M +45.3% 1Y
Market cap
$576.70B
P/E
53.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.62%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 6, Asml Holding 4, Mks 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMKSILRCXASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.18B $276.60B $576.70B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.0x 32.8x 53.1x MKSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 21.9x 31.4x MKSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.3% +33.4% +22.9% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% 32.3% 29.1% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 49.6% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -0.4x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.50% 0.50% 0.62% ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.1% +42.1% +45.3% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr +29.4%/yr +12.1%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.2% 66.2% 47.4% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 69/100 47/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

MKSILRCXASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMKSILRCXASML
Valuation 73 #26 of 94 52 #46 of 94 16 #79 of 94
Growth 67 #31 of 92 84 #16 of 92 81 #18 of 92
Profitability 61 #36 of 90 96 #5 of 90 79 #20 of 90
Financial Health 1 #100 of 101 47 #54 of 101 14 #87 of 101
Shareholder Returns 63 #30 of 79 65 #28 of 79 44 #45 of 79
Overall 53 69 47
  • MKSI ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMKSILRCXASMLSPY
1 month -30.5%-36.0%-19.5% -1.0%
3 months -37.7%-28.0%-10.8% -0.4%
6 months -33.6%-25.5%-3.1% +4.5%
Year to date +22.0%+29.4%+39.9% +12.4%
1 year +42.1%+42.1%+45.3% +13.6%
3 years +184.7%+249.2%+132.9% +76.4%
3 years, per year +41.8%+51.8%+32.6% +20.8%
5 years +21.6%+262.5%+76.7% +63.7%
5 years, per year +4.0%+29.4%+12.1% +10.4%
10 years +301.1%+2,230.8%+1,359.9% +267.7%
10 years, per year +14.9%+37.0%+30.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureMKSILRCXASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.2%66.2%47.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.2%66.0%47.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.753.222.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.680.640.95 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.5%-56.8%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.2%-48.9%-24.8% -1.6%
52-week high $444.80$433.33$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $137.20$139.59$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMKSILRCXASML
P/E now vs peer median 30.0xmedian 40.5x 32.8xmedian 40.5x 53.1xmedian 40.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 6.5x 10.6xmedian 6.5x 15.3xmedian 6.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 24.9x 27.0xmedian 24.9x —median 24.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 36.9x 42.3xmedian 36.9x 46.0xmedian 36.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 3.9x 19.9xmedian 3.9x 25.0xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.98median 1.85 1.05median 1.85 2.20median 1.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMKSILRCXASML
Revenue $4.35B $26.13B $37.62B
Gross profit $2.04B $13.34B $19.58B
Operating income $681.00M $9.65B –
Net income $439.00M $8.45B –
Free cash flow $455.00M $6.54B –
R&D $310.00M $2.47B –
EPS (diluted) $6.05 $6.73 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $611.00M $7.44B $15.17B
Total debt $3.94B $3.74B $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 72.70M 1.26B 388.90M
Enterprise value $10.63B $252.65B $532.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXASML
P/E 30.0x 32.8x 53.1x
P/FCF 29.0x 42.3x 46.0x
P/Operating cash flow 20.8x 36.5x –
P/S 3.0x 10.6x 15.3x
P/B 4.4x 19.9x 25.0x
P/Tangible book 13.5x 19.9x 25.7x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 27.0x –
EV/EBIT 24.2x 28.3x –
EV/Revenue 3.8x 10.4x 15.0x
EV/FCF 36.3x 41.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.0x 36.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.98 1.05 2.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.3% 33.4% 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 18.2% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.4% 38.1% 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 23.4% 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.5% 49.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 35.4% 29.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 64.4% 45.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 28.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 52.8% 47.0% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 31.1% 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% 18.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.7% 15.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -13.3% 17.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.9% 13.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXASML
Gross margin 47.0% 51.1% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 24.0% 38.7% –
Operating margin 15.7% 37.0% –
Pretax margin 11.2% 37.2% –
Net margin 10.1% 32.3% 29.1%
FCF margin 10.5% 25.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.6% 29.0% –
Return on equity 15.2% 64.1% –
Return on assets 5.0% 33.9% –
Return on invested capital 8.9% 49.6% –
Return on capital employed 10.6% 54.8% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXASML
Debt / assets 44.1% 14.2% 8.7%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 8.7x 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 66.6% 47.2% 61.2%
Equity / assets 33.4% 52.8% 38.8%
Interest coverage 3.7x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 2.5x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.26 18.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMKSILRCXASML
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
Net buyback yield – 1.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.5% 1.8% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 14.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 13.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMKSILRCXASML
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 21.9xFY2027 31.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.48FY2026 $10.12FY2027 $47.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.1%FY2026 +73.9%FY2027 +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +34.9% +12.6% +42.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.43BFY2026 $32.96BFY2027 $47.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +38.1%FY2026 +41.9%FY2027 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.0% +25.0% +42.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMKSILRCXASML
Held by institutions 100.0% 85.6% 19.8%
Institutions holding 777 3,137 2,493
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +6.2% +8.0%
Institutions buying 455 1,701 1,359
Institutions selling 253 1,163 783
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.46 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MKSILRCXASML
MKSI 1.00 0.84 0.75
LRCX 0.84 1.00 0.85
ASML 0.75 0.85 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MKSI, LRCX and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mks (MKSI) $13.18B, Lam Research (LRCX) $276.60B, Asml Holding (ASML) $576.70B.

Which stock is cheaper, MKSI, LRCX and ASML?

Mks (MKSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mks (MKSI) 30.0x, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.8x, Asml Holding (ASML) 53.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Mks (MKSI) is cheapest (Mks (MKSI) 14.5x, Lam Research (LRCX) 21.9x, Asml Holding (ASML) 31.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mks (MKSI) +16.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Mks (MKSI) 10.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Mks (MKSI) 8.9%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Mks (MKSI) +42.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) +42.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) +45.3%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Mks (MKSI) +4.0%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +29.4%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +12.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Mks (MKSI) 0.50%, Lam Research (LRCX) 0.50%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.62%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Mks (MKSI) 62.2%, Lam Research (LRCX) 66.2%, Asml Holding (ASML) 47.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MKSI, LRCX and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.