MITK vs OSPN vs YOU Stock Comparison

Mitek Systems, OneSpan and Clear Secure Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MITK Mitek Systems Inc
$18.38 +4.1% 1M +91.9% 1Y
Market cap
$841.16M
P/E
37.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$197.90M
Div. yield
–
Identity and Access Management Technology
2 wins
OSPN OneSpan Inc.
$20.36 +14.3% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$741.66M
P/E
10.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$246.38M
Div. yield
0.03%
Identity and Access Management Technology
6 wins
YOU Clear Secure, Inc.
$45.56 +15.0% 1M +43.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.56B
P/E
30.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.00B
Div. yield
0.01%
Identity and Access Management Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

OneSpan leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (OneSpan 6, Clear Secure 3, Mitek Systems 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMITKOSPNYOULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $841.16M $741.66M $4.56B YOU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.3x 10.8x 30.8x OSPN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x 16.8x 24.2x OSPN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.1% +2.4% +19.8% YOU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 27.8% 14.8% OSPN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.0x -0.7x — MITK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.01% OSPN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +91.9% +27.3% +43.1% MITK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.7%/yr 0.0%/yr +1.8%/yr YOU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.0% 48.4% 57.6% OSPN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 80/100 71/100 OSPN

Percentile Scorecard

MITKOSPNYOU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMITKOSPNYOU
Valuation 86 #18 of 124 94 #9 of 124 81 #25 of 124
Growth 40 #68 of 113 55 #51 of 113 88 #14 of 113
Profitability 93 #9 of 109 91 #11 of 109 99 #2 of 109
Financial Health 72 #36 of 127 70 #39 of 127 24 #97 of 127
Shareholder Returns 78 #15 of 65 89 #8 of 65 64 #24 of 65
Overall 74 80 71
  • MITK ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • OSPN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • YOU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMITKOSPNYOUSPY
1 month +4.1%+14.3%+15.0% -0.2%
3 months +9.5%+31.9%-15.4% +3.9%
6 months +30.7%+76.9%-15.3% +8.2%
Year to date +74.2%+58.6%+29.9% +12.9%
1 year +91.9%+27.3%+43.1% +12.3%
3 years +76.9%+164.1%+175.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.0%+38.3%+40.3% +23.3%
5 years -3.6%-0.2%+9.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -0.7%0.0%+1.8% +10.9%
10 years +175.1%+42.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.7%+3.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMITKOSPNYOUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.0%48.4%57.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.5%60.2%45.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.631.040.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.670.560.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.1%-63.8%-68.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.7%-1.2%-26.9% -1.2%
52-week high $20.14$20.60$62.36 $779.14
52-week low $8.65$10.15$30.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMITKOSPNYOU
P/E now vs peer median 36.8xmedian 38.6x 11.1xmedian 38.6x 31.1xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 4.4x 3.0xmedian 4.4x 6.1xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 34.5x 12.6xmedian 34.5x 18.1xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 29.4x 18.6xmedian 29.4x 12.1xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 3.3x 2.7xmedian 3.3x 25.2xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.23median 1.28 0.19median 1.28 0.47median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMITKOSPNYOU
Revenue $197.90M $246.38M $1.00B
Gross profit $165.47M $181.29M –
Operating income $35.22M $44.32M $251.47M
Net income $22.54M $68.40M $220.38M
Free cash flow $48.61M $40.17M $508.39M
R&D $31.23M $35.77M $72.38M
EPS (diluted) $0.46 $1.79 $1.44
Cash & equivalents $90.05M $43.34M $128.23M
Total debt $49.38M $5.00M –
Shares (diluted) 48.71M 38.14M 102.77M
Enterprise value $280.77M $492.51M $1.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMITKOSPNYOU
P/E 36.8x 11.1x 31.1x
P/FCF 17.1x 18.6x 12.1x
P/Operating cash flow 15.4x 14.4x 11.3x
P/S 4.2x 3.0x 6.1x
P/B 3.3x 2.7x 25.2x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 2.9x 25.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.8x 12.6x 18.1x
EV/EBIT 22.1x 16.0x 20.6x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.9x 5.2x
EV/FCF 16.0x 17.7x 10.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.5x 13.7x 9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.23 0.19 0.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMITKOSPNYOU
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.1% 2.4% 19.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.3% 2.8% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.5% 1.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 6.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 77.8% -12.7% 68.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% 48.1% 61.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.3% 14.2% -4.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.9% 57.1% 66.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.8% 16.8% -22.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.9% 58.6% 66.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -5.8% -16.2% 68.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 295.9% 33.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.9% -26.4% 66.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 77.1% 37.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMITKOSPNYOU
Gross margin 83.6% 73.6% –
EBITDA margin 26.6% 22.9% 28.6%
Operating margin 17.8% 18.0% 25.1%
Pretax margin 16.0% 17.8% 28.0%
Net margin 11.4% 27.8% 14.8%
FCF margin 24.6% 16.3% 50.8%
Operating cash flow margin 27.1% 21.1% 54.2%
Return on equity 9.2% 25.1% 96.5%
Return on assets 6.2% 17.8% 14.7%
Return on invested capital 8.5% – –
Return on capital employed 11.7% 15.3% 48.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 0.8x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 4.2% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMITKOSPNYOU
Debt / assets 13.4% 1.3% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.0x -0.7x –
Debt / FCF 1.0x 0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 31.9% 29.3% 84.6%
Equity / assets 68.1% 70.7% 15.4%
Interest coverage 4.9x – –
Current ratio 2.7x 1.3x 1.0x
Quick ratio 2.6x 1.0x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.5x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 5.35 5.86 4.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMITKOSPNYOU
Dividend yield – 2.5% 1.4%
Net buyback yield 2.2% 2.9% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 5.4% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 27.9% 24.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 47.5% 10.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 107.7% 20.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 49.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMITKOSPNYOU
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 16.8xFY2026 24.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.08FY2026 $1.21FY2026 $1.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.7%FY2026 -18.8%FY2026 +67.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.5% +11.6% +14.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $185.93MFY2026 $259.12MFY2026 $1.14BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.5%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 +26.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.1% +2.7% +5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMITKOSPNYOU
Held by institutions 84.7% 95.2% 95.5%
Institutions holding 188 194 448
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +7.3% +2.5%
Institutions buying 107 112 265
Institutions selling 53 50 125
Buyers to sellers 2.02 2.24 2.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MITKOSPNYOU
MITK 1.00 0.42 0.40
OSPN 0.42 1.00 0.25
YOU 0.40 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MITK, OSPN and YOU?

Clear Secure (YOU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mitek Systems (MITK) $841.16M, OneSpan (OSPN) $741.66M, Clear Secure (YOU) $4.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, MITK, OSPN and YOU?

OneSpan (OSPN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitek Systems (MITK) 37.3x, OneSpan (OSPN) 10.8x, Clear Secure (YOU) 30.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, OneSpan (OSPN) is cheapest (Mitek Systems (MITK) 17.0x, OneSpan (OSPN) 16.8x, Clear Secure (YOU) 24.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Clear Secure (YOU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitek Systems (MITK) +11.1%, OneSpan (OSPN) +2.4%, Clear Secure (YOU) +19.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

OneSpan (OSPN) has the highest net margin (Mitek Systems (MITK) 11.4%, OneSpan (OSPN) 27.8%, Clear Secure (YOU) 14.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitek Systems (MITK) returned the most: Mitek Systems (MITK) +91.9%, OneSpan (OSPN) +27.3%, Clear Secure (YOU) +43.1%. Over five years, Clear Secure (YOU) compounded fastest (Mitek Systems (MITK) -0.7%/yr, OneSpan (OSPN) 0.0%/yr, Clear Secure (YOU) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

OneSpan (OSPN) has the highest dividend yield: Mitek Systems (MITK) 0.00%, OneSpan (OSPN) 0.03%, Clear Secure (YOU) 0.01%. Mitek Systems (MITK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, OneSpan (OSPN) has been the steadiest (Mitek Systems (MITK) 55.0%, OneSpan (OSPN) 48.4%, Clear Secure (YOU) 57.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MITK, OSPN and YOU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, OneSpan (OSPN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.