MGRT vs EXLS vs CTSH Stock Comparison

Mega Fortune, ExlService Holdings and Cognizant Technology Solutions Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (INFY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MGRT Mega Fortune Co Ltd
$120.50 +17.4% 1M +2,354.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cognizant Technology Solutions leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cognizant Technology Solutions 6, ExlService Holdings 4, Mega Fortune 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMGRTEXLSCTSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.66B $6.42B $29.42B CTSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 24.8x 11.8x CTSH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 19.7x 11.6x CTSH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +15.6% +5.0% EXLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.1% 11.8% CTSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 19.9% 15.7% EXLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x 0.0x CTSH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 2.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2,354.2% +8.8% -10.7% MGRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +10.3%/yr -4.0%/yr EXLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 206.4% 42.6% 43.5% EXLS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 66/100 75/100 CTSH

Percentile Scorecard

MGRTEXLSCTSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMGRTEXLSCTSH
Valuation – 20 #41 of 51 66 #18 of 51
Growth – 84 #8 of 46 67 #16 of 46
Profitability – 90 #5 of 42 88 #6 of 42
Financial Health 80 #13 of 61 62 #24 of 61 77 #15 of 61
Shareholder Returns – 72 #9 of 30 76 #8 of 30
Overall – 66 75
  • MGRT ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • EXLS ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • CTSH ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMGRTEXLSCTSHSPY
1 month +17.4%+19.0%+11.2% -2.3%
3 months +31.1%+24.2%+18.0% -0.7%
6 months -13.8%+34.1%+25.5% +4.8%
Year to date +1,504.5%+0.2%-21.6% +10.3%
1 year +2,354.2%+8.8%-10.7% +10.3%
3 years —+59.5%-1.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+16.9%-0.6% +20.1%
5 years —+63.0%-18.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+10.3%-4.0% +10.1%
10 years —+377.3%+26.6% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+16.9%+2.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMGRTEXLSCTSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 206.4%42.6%43.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 143.4%44.3%44.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.84-0.050.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 11.400.21-0.25 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.1%-51.3%-58.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.3%-2.0%-24.9% -3.5%
52-week high $142.20$43.38$86.70 $779.14
52-week low $4.52$25.22$38.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMGRTEXLSCTSH
P/E now vs peer median —median 18.5x 24.8xmedian 18.5x 11.8xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.7x 2.7xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.5x 16.1xmedian 9.5x 7.3xmedian 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.5x 23.7xmedian 12.5x 12.5xmedian 12.5x
P/B now vs peer median 137.4xmedian 1.5x 6.9xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.24 1.41median 1.24 1.17median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMGRTEXLSCTSH
Revenue – $2.34B $21.89B
Gross profit – $898.82M $7.32B
Operating income – $346.00M $3.44B
Net income – $260.61M $2.57B
Free cash flow – $271.19M $2.36B
EPS (diluted) – $1.71 $5.52
Cash & equivalents $9.81K $154.07M $1.52B
Total debt $608.56K $511.05M $1.55B
Shares (diluted) 10.79M 152.57M 466.00M
Enterprise value $1.66B $5.22B $23.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMGRTEXLSCTSH
P/E – 24.8x 11.8x
P/FCF – 23.7x 12.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.7x 10.9x
P/S – 2.7x 1.3x
P/B 137.4x 6.9x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 144.5x 7.8x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA – 16.1x 7.3x
EV/EBIT – 19.1x 8.5x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 1.3x
EV/FCF – 24.3x 12.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 20.2x 10.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.41 1.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMGRTEXLSCTSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 15.6% 5.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 13.7% 4.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 16.0% 3.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 12.7% 4.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.7% 9.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.9% 20.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% 7.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 14.4% 26.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 17.6% 10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -3.7% -8.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.3% 5.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -5.5% -10.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.7% 6.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMGRTEXLSCTSH
Gross margin – 38.4% 33.4%
EBITDA margin – 17.5% 18.3%
Operating margin – 14.8% 15.7%
Pretax margin – 14.4% 15.9%
Net margin – 11.1% 11.8%
FCF margin – 11.6% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 13.9% 12.3%
Return on equity – 29.0% 17.6%
Return on assets – 13.6% 12.2%
Return on invested capital – 19.9% 15.7%
Return on capital employed – 23.6% 19.7%
Asset turnover – 1.2x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 4.0% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMGRTEXLSCTSH
Debt / assets 4.5% 24.6% 7.3%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x 0.0x
Debt / FCF – 1.9x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 10.8% 55.2% 30.9%
Equity / assets 89.2% 44.8% 69.1%
Interest coverage – 17.6x 73.2x
Current ratio 7.4x 2.2x 2.2x
Quick ratio 3.0x 2.2x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 6.51 5.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMGRTEXLSCTSH
Dividend yield – – 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 4.9% 7.3%
Shareholder yield – 4.9% 9.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 23.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 26.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMGRTEXLSCTSH
Forward P/E – 19.7xFY2026 11.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.16FY2026 $5.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.8%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +26.4% +10.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.53BFY2026 $20.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +21.3%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.5% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMGRTEXLSCTSH
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 442 917
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.7% +6.6%
Institutions buying – 211 464
Institutions selling – 188 354
Buyers to sellers – 1.12 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MGRTEXLSCTSH
MGRT 1.00 -0.02 -0.13
EXLS -0.02 1.00 0.78
CTSH -0.13 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MGRT, EXLS and CTSH?

Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mega Fortune (MGRT) $1.66B, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) $6.42B, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) $29.42B.

Which stock is cheaper, MGRT, EXLS and CTSH?

Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ExlService Holdings (EXLS) 24.8x, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 11.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) is cheapest (ExlService Holdings (EXLS) 19.7x, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 11.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ExlService Holdings (EXLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ExlService Holdings (EXLS) +15.6%, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) +5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) has the highest net margin (ExlService Holdings (EXLS) 11.1%, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) leads (ExlService Holdings (EXLS) 19.9%, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 15.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mega Fortune (MGRT) returned the most: Mega Fortune (MGRT) +2,354.2%, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) +8.8%, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) -10.7%. Over five years, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) compounded fastest (ExlService Holdings (EXLS) +10.3%/yr, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) -4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 2.00%. Mega Fortune (MGRT) and ExlService Holdings (EXLS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) has been the steadiest (Mega Fortune (MGRT) 206.4%, ExlService Holdings (EXLS) 42.6%, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) 43.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MGRT, EXLS and CTSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cognizant Technology Solutions (CTSH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.