MGNO vs TFSL vs CFFN Stock Comparison

Magnolia Bancorp, TFS Financial and Capitol Federal Financial Prices as of Oct 30, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WNEB) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MGNO Magnolia Bancorp, Inc.
$14.55 -4.0% 1M +29.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.11M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.38M
Div. yield
–
Thrifts and Savings Banks Financial Services
1 win
TFSL TFS Financial CORP
$16.52 -1.8% 1M +24.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.67B
P/E
45.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$343.73M
Div. yield
0.01%
Thrifts and Savings Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Capitol Federal Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Capitol Federal Financial 6, TFS Financial 2, Magnolia Bancorp 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMGNOTFSLCFFNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.11M $4.67B $1.09B TFSL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -50.9x 45.8x 13.1x CFFN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 41.1x 10.6x CFFN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.8% +10.5% +19.4% CFFN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -17.2% 29.7% 36.1% CFFN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 9.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.3% +24.2% +42.5% CFFN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.4%/yr -7.1%/yr TFSL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.6% 21.9% 22.6% MGNO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 30/100 48/100 CFFN

Percentile Scorecard

MGNOTFSLCFFN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMGNOTFSLCFFN
Valuation 5 #341 of 359 1 #354 of 359 18 #296 of 359
Growth 16 #285 of 340 73 #93 of 340 83 #60 of 340
Profitability 1 #339 of 343 19 #278 of 343 36 #219 of 343
Financial Health 78 #75 of 338 – 7 #316 of 338
Shareholder Returns 13 #307 of 351 29 #251 of 351 98 #8 of 351
Overall 23 30 48
  • MGNO ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFSL ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFFN ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMGNOTFSLCFFNSPY
1 month -4.0%-1.8%+0.3% -2.3%
3 months +6.1%-10.4%-5.4% -0.7%
6 months +4.3%+10.7%+12.1% +4.8%
Year to date +22.8%+23.5%+26.4% +10.3%
1 year +29.3%+24.2%+42.5% +10.3%
3 years —+29.8%+55.7% +73.0%
3 years, per year —+9.1%+15.9% +20.1%
5 years —-16.1%-30.8% +61.9%
5 years, per year —-3.4%-7.1% +10.1%
10 years —-4.9%-39.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year —-0.5%-5.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMGNOTFSLCFFNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.6%21.9%22.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.2%23.0%22.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.240.490.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.361.101.89 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -9.8%-45.4%-66.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.1%-11.2%-6.3% -3.5%
52-week high $15.34$18.61$9.19 $779.14
52-week low $11.19$13.29$6.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMGNOTFSLCFFN
P/E now vs peer median -50.9xmedian 12.7x 45.1xmedian 12.7x 12.9xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 3.5x 13.5xmedian 3.5x 4.7xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6,055xmedian 4.9x 7.3xmedian 4.9x 8.0xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -48.2xmedian 11.4x 53.7xmedian 11.4x 15.1xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.46 5.83median 1.46 0.85median 1.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMGNOTFSLCFFN
Revenue $1.38M $343.73M $229.25M
Net income -$238.00K $102.06M $82.84M
Free cash flow -$251.00K $86.27M $71.53M
EPS (diluted) – $0.36 $0.67
Cash & equivalents – – $136.10M
Total debt – – $1.64B
Shares (diluted) – 280.18M 124.01M
Enterprise value $12.11M $4.67B $136.70M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMGNOTFSLCFFN
P/E -50.9x 45.1x 12.9x
P/FCF -48.2x 53.7x 15.1x
P/Operating cash flow -48.2x 47.4x 13.9x
P/S 8.8x 13.5x 4.7x
P/B 0.6x – 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.6x – 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6,055x 7.3x 8.0x
EV/EBIT -257.7x 7.6x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 8.8x 13.5x 11.3x
EV/FCF -48.2x 53.7x 36.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -48.2x 47.4x 33.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 5.83 0.85

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMGNOTFSLCFFN
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.8% 10.5% 19.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.6% 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -67.6% 22.7% 35.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% 12.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 22.6% 41.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.7% 15.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.7% 180.7% 155.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.8% 4.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.7% 247.6% 185.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 4.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMGNOTFSLCFFN
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 0.1% 185.3% 140.4%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin -17.6% 37.7% 44.7%
Net margin -17.2% 29.7% 36.1%
FCF margin -18.1% 25.1% 31.2%
Operating cash flow margin -18.1% 28.5% 34.0%
Return on equity -1.2% – 8.1%
Return on assets -0.6% – 0.8%
Return on invested capital – – 9.5%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.0x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 3.4% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMGNOTFSLCFFN
Debt / assets – – 16.9%
Debt / equity – – 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.7x
Debt / FCF – – 22.9x
Liabilities / assets 44.7% – 89.4%
Equity / assets 55.3% – 10.6%
Interest coverage -0.2x 1.3x 1.5x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMGNOTFSLCFFN
Dividend yield – 7.0% 4.5%
Net buyback yield 0.1% 0.2% 4.6%
Shareholder yield 0.1% 7.2% 9.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 58.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 69.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMGNOTFSLCFFN
Forward P/E – 41.1xFY2027 10.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.40FY2027 $0.81FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +10.7%FY2027 +16.3%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +10.0% -2.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $326.56MFY2026 $249.46MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.6%FY2026 +24.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +11.4% -3.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMGNOTFSLCFFN
Held by institutions – 13.7% 81.1%
Institutions holding – 235 244
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.4% +0.4%
Institutions buying – 124 110
Institutions selling – 71 79
Buyers to sellers – 1.75 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MGNOTFSLCFFN
MGNO 1.00 -0.07 0.06
TFSL -0.07 1.00 0.69
CFFN 0.06 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MGNO, TFSL and CFFN?

TFS Financial (TFSL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) $12.11M, TFS Financial (TFSL) $4.67B, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) $1.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, MGNO, TFSL and CFFN?

Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) -50.9x, TFS Financial (TFSL) 45.8x, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 13.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) is cheapest (TFS Financial (TFSL) 41.1x, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) +12.8%, TFS Financial (TFSL) +10.5%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) +19.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) has the highest net margin (Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) -17.2%, TFS Financial (TFSL) 29.7%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 36.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) returned the most: Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) +29.3%, TFS Financial (TFSL) +24.2%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) +42.5%. Over five years, TFS Financial (TFSL) compounded fastest (TFS Financial (TFSL) -3.4%/yr, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) -7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: TFS Financial (TFSL) 0.01%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 0.00%. Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) and Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) has been the steadiest (Magnolia Bancorp (MGNO) 21.6%, TFS Financial (TFSL) 21.9%, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) 22.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MGNO, TFSL and CFFN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Capitol Federal Financial (CFFN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.